IRS officials knew of agents’ tea party targeting in 2011
May 11th, 2013
06:16 PM ET
1 year ago

IRS officials knew of agents’ tea party targeting in 2011

Washington (CNN) - Officials at the Internal Revenue Service knew in June 2011 that their agents were targeting conservative groups for additional scrutiny on tax documents, an inspector general report to be released this week is expected to say, according to a congressional source familiar with the inquiry.

Further, an early timeline of events compiled by the inspector general and obtained by CNN indicates the agency's practice of singling out conservative groups began as early as March 2010, and in July of that year, unidentified managers within the agency "requested its specialists to be on the lookout for tea party applications." In August, specialists were warned to be on the lookout for "various local organizations in the tea party movement" applying for tax-exempt status. The specific criteria would change several times over the next two years, according to a portion of the report.

Following tea party complaints, IRS admits 'mistakes'

More: Palin blasts IRS 'corruption'

An IRS official on Friday admitted the agency made "mistakes" in the last few years with tax-exempt status applications and specifically those submitted by groups with the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their names. Multiple conservative groups have said their applications were delayed and returned with lengthy requests for supporting materials, sometimes including website printouts and lists of guest speakers.

The Treasury Department inspector general for tax administration launched an audit of the agency's practices, and spokesman David Barnes said the report is being finalized and is expected to be released this week.

Barnes said the review was requested by Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and focused on programs and operations. An audit is separate from an investigation, which would assess wrongdoing such as violation of law or policies.

President Barack Obama's spokesman Jay Carney said Saturday that Obama believes the government should be staffed with "the very best public servants with the highest levels of integrity" and that "based on recent media reports, (the president) is concerned that the conduct of a small number of Internal Revenue Service employees may have fallen short of that standard."

"If the Inspector General finds that there were any rules broken or that conduct of government officials did not meet the standards required of them, the president expects that swift and appropriate steps will be taken to address any misconduct," he said in a statement.

Lois Lerner, director of tax-exempt organizations for the IRS, publicly admitted on Friday for the first time that agents used the keywords "tea party" and "patriot" to flag applications for further review, but she stressed that was done as a "shortcut" for picking the applications to review, not out of "political bias."

The IRS commissioner at the time said at a March 2012 congressional hearing that his agency did not target conservative groups for political reasons.

"I can give you assurances. We pride ourselves in being a nonpolitical, nonpartisan organization," Commissioner Douglas Shulman said. "There is absolutely no targeting. This is the kind of back and forth that happens when people apply for 501(c)(4) status."

The congressional source familiar with the inquiry understood that Lerner knew of the targeting in 2011 but sent letters to Congress earlier this year without disclosing the extent of her knowledge.

Lerner said on the Friday conference call that she "did not feel comfortable answering" as to when senior IRS officials became aware of the situation. She also said she could not give a time frame for when the IRS began looking into complaints.

She said the IRS has implemented changes to prevent similar mistakes in the future but could not say that any IRS employees had been disciplined.

The IRS said Sunday that the timeline in the inspector general's report was accurate, but that it "does not contradict" Shulman's March testimony.

"While Exempt Organizations officials knew of the situation earlier, the timeline reflects that IRS senior leadership did not have this level of detail," the statement from the IRS read. "The timeline supports what the IRS acknowledged on Friday that mistakes were made. There were not partisan reasons behind this."

The applications

The applications in question were processed by an office in Cincinnati that handles most applications for 501(c)(4) status and had seen the number of applications rise sharply between 2010 and 2012, Lerner said.

Some 75 conservative groups, flagged by agents because of their names, were among 300 groups singled out for this additional scrutiny, she said. The agency received more than 3,400 applications for 501(c)(4) status in 2012.

"They did pick the cases by names and that's absolutely inappropriate and not the way we should do things," she said, though stressing it was done as a "shortcut," not out of political bias.

Officials with some groups subjected to the scrutiny said they would have had to supply thousands of documents, stacked inches thick, to comply with the requests. Some chose not to, saying the agency was attempting to bury them in paperwork.

Tax-exempt groups are allowed to advocate for causes so long as their primary activities are dedicated to "social welfare," according to IRS rules. When an advocacy case is filed for further review, the IRS tries to determine if the group plans on sticking by that calculus.

The timeline

IRS scrutiny of conservative applications appears to have begun well before the groups had any idea they were in the spotlight.

The timeline prepared by the inspector general and obtained by CNN redacts events before March 2010 as well as several between then and July 15, 2012, when the timeline concludes. But between the omitted content is a series of events showing what was happening inside the agency.

Initially, unidentified managers from the Determinations Unit of the IRS searched for "applications involving political sounding names (such as ) 'We the People' or 'Take Back the Country.'" In mid-March 2010, the agency identified 10 tea party-related cases, and by April 5, there was a list of 18, though "three had already been approved as tax exempt," the report read.

In late April and May, specialists from the Technical Unit were involved, and on June 7, the "Determinations Unit began training its specialists on emerging issues to watch for, including an emerging issue referred to as Tea Party Cases."

That summer, an e-mail and a "be on the lookout" note were sent to employees that included a "coordinator contact for the cases."

Over the next year, some responsibilities shifted and new staff joined the effort.

The timeline suggests the first hesitation within the agency regarding the process came in June 2011, when "the acting director, Rulings and Agreements, commented that the criteria being used to identify tea party cases may have resulted in over-inclusion." But part of that entry, as well as the preceding one, are redacted from the timeline.

Later that month the director of exempt organizations was briefed on the efforts, and the criteria for evaluating applications were adjusted, one of several times the criteria would be tweaked. A guide sheet for handling applications was developed, and in September, "A Technical Unit specialist reviewed the list (of applications) to determine if any cases could be closed on merit or closed with an adverse determination letter," meaning the application would be accepted or denied.

The timeline continues to show incremental changes to the criteria, additional reviews and the involvement of counsel after the entry labeled "February-March 2012."

"Numerous news articles began to be published with complaints from tea party organizations about the IRS's unfair treatment," it read. "Congress also began to show interest in the IRS's treatment of Tea Party organizations."

Congress asks questions

By March of 2012, Congress was asking questions of the IRS. That month, Shulman denied the agency targeted groups for political reasons at the congressional hearing.

There was also an exchange of letters involving Capitol Hill, Shulman and Lerner.

"News reports ... indicate that the IRS effort lacks balance, with conservative organizations being the target of the IRS's scrutiny," Issa wrote to Lerner in a March 27, 2012, letter obtained by CNN. He noted a Capitol Hill news outlet had "contacted several liberal groups ... (and) none had received the recently-sent questionnaire."

Lerner responded that the IRS sets aside "applications that require further development by an agent in order to determine whether the application meets the requirements for tax-exempt status.

"... The revenue agent uses sound reasoning based on tax law training and his or her experience to review the application and identify the additional information needed to make a proper determination of the organization's exempt status," she wrote deeper in the eight-page response.

She did not disclose in that letter that the IRS targeted conservative groups, even if for nonpolitical reasons.

Separately, a dozen U.S. senators, led by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, sent Shulman a letter asking for more information about this situation.

Shulman's six-year term ended in November and the agency is currently led by interim commissioner Steven Miller.

CNN's Athena Jones and Ashley Killough contributed to this report.


Filed under: IRS
soundoff (487 Responses)
  1. SeeThruIt2

    The IRS admits that an inappropriate number of conservative groups were targeted. Some groups didn't receive their approval until after 3 years and after the 2012 election. The IRS was demanding info that would have cost those groups an undisclosed amount of money to gather (costing them their donated funds).

    If no rules were broken, we need Congress to change the rules. Using U.S. government agencies to target the opposition party should be illegal because it subverts the very reason we pay taxes to run a government FOR THE PEOPLE.

    May 11, 2013 10:09 pm at 10:09 pm |
  2. American

    No comments? Idk how searching for terms like tea party and patriots for standard procedure. I didn't realize only republicans were called patriots it is a fitting term

    May 11, 2013 10:10 pm at 10:10 pm |
  3. nnuut

    You liberals don't miss a chance to use Chicago politics every chance your get, cheating, lying and basically being dishonest, so sad!

    May 11, 2013 10:12 pm at 10:12 pm |
  4. The Contentious Otter

    Will Republicans be smart enough to handle this in a responsible and mature manner, or will they want to run an endless stream of kangaroo court hearings, trying to make variations in practice by a few employees into the next big imaginary White House conspiracy, and end up turning this into their next "Birther Moment"?

    I'm putting my money on stupid. They'll make this blow up in their own faces.

    May 11, 2013 10:12 pm at 10:12 pm |
  5. Dude in Colorado

    Way to cave to right-wing political bs there IRS! But then your head was appointed by Bush. (Sigh)
    Yeh, I think I'm going to form a political group called "I Never Want to Pay Taxes!" and then apply for tax exempt status! I mean, if I did that why would the IRS ever possibly want to investigate to make sure I'm on the up-and-up?

    May 11, 2013 10:15 pm at 10:15 pm |
  6. mentallect

    Tea Party organizations platform is founded upon not paying taxes so it stands to reason they are more scrutinized. If a bloody knife is found at the crime scene with OJ standing by it along with a nurse, I am sure OJ will get more scrutiny.

    May 11, 2013 10:20 pm at 10:20 pm |
  7. Harlon Katz

    Imagine if GWB were in office and the IRS was targeting groups with the word "progress" in their name.

    May 11, 2013 10:22 pm at 10:22 pm |
  8. Danram

    The Obama presidency is the most "imperial" presidency since Richard Nixon's. First we find that the current administration maintains an "enemies list" just like the Nixon White House did. And now we find that the IRS is preferentially targeting political opponents of the administration, just like it did under Nixon. Very disturbing. So much for "hope and change." But at least Nixon knew how to get things done.

    May 11, 2013 10:23 pm at 10:23 pm |
  9. Bob

    This is completely unacceptable. The fact that only Republican House members would be incensed about this, and that Democrat reps would not take up this issue is even further evidence of the partisan bickering going on on the Hill. This should incense ANY American patriot, on either side of the isle!

    May 11, 2013 10:28 pm at 10:28 pm |
  10. Dragonfly

    Another example of the Obama Administration using govenmental tools to target those that disagree. There is no excuse for this kind of behavior. It is flagrantly BIg Brother, and proves everything conservatives have said about the entrusiveness and over-reaching going on.

    May 11, 2013 10:29 pm at 10:29 pm |
  11. Greg

    Yawn.... whats new. China, Iran, and Syria do this stuff all the time. And....?

    May 11, 2013 10:31 pm at 10:31 pm |
  12. Scott

    From now on I'm including a reverse audit request with every check I send the IRS. If I don't like their political leanings or distribution of funds they can expect unexplained delays from me.

    May 11, 2013 10:34 pm at 10:34 pm |
  13. skooloose

    When the so called, "Low-level IRS employees" are given their walking papers they will be shouting to the roof tops blaming their superiors which will eventually reach Obama's desk. Just my opinion, but Obama is history. You can thumb your nose at Americans, but eventually they thumb back. The main stream media MUST cover these recent stories because they have painted themselves into a corner with their lack of objectivity covering Obama and now they will either cease to exist as journalist or expose Obama for the person he really is.

    May 11, 2013 10:35 pm at 10:35 pm |
  14. Walter

    Spin away little libbies, spin away. Between this and Benghazi, the libs are in deep doo-doo.

    May 11, 2013 10:39 pm at 10:39 pm |
  15. Tmanzl1

    Of course this is no big deal folks, happens all the time, move along.

    May 11, 2013 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm |
  16. sbuler

    Personally, I could care less. Conservatives have so much money behind them we are hardly a democracy. It is laughable that they are indignant that it is "not fair."

    May 11, 2013 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm |
  17. T. Lee

    SHADES OF J EDGAR !!!!

    This is so NOT o.k.

    May 11, 2013 10:44 pm at 10:44 pm |
  18. rare_earth

    One evil attacking another.

    May 11, 2013 10:45 pm at 10:45 pm |
  19. Jake

    How is anyone surprised that this Administration's IRS is using these kind of tactics. This is just a drop in the bucket. They are also using the Department of Justice, friendly States Attorney General and virtually every other means to attack their opposition. Chicago land politics brought to DC and then franchised.

    May 11, 2013 10:46 pm at 10:46 pm |
  20. tom delparte

    Wow just wow. What's happening to this country? And some how we're supposed to trust big government according to our president

    May 11, 2013 10:46 pm at 10:46 pm |
  21. Vence

    Not just conservative groups by immigrants too!!

    May 11, 2013 10:49 pm at 10:49 pm |
  22. Silence dogood

    Funny how no liberals comment on this article.

    May 11, 2013 10:50 pm at 10:50 pm |
  23. Duane st.pete FL

    Any true American regardless of political leanings should demand our government or any arm or agency of our government never target people or organizations because of political beliefs.....any rational person know they are non violent.

    May 11, 2013 10:51 pm at 10:51 pm |
  24. Bryan

    I'd say the Tea Baggers are nothing more than terrorists, but I really don't think they are smart enough to be terrorists.

    May 11, 2013 10:51 pm at 10:51 pm |
  25. Namejanek

    Can we say, profiling. The IRS commissioner should be fired and some agents from Cincinnati office should be fired also.

    May 11, 2013 10:54 pm at 10:54 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20