Washington (CNN) - As the Ukrainian military readied for a possible widespread Russian incursion into its Crimea region, Republican lawmakers urged President Barack Obama to take action to prevent the situation from descending into chaos.
In a statement released Saturday, Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, said he is "deeply concerned" Russia's presence in Ukraine could expand if the President does not outline consequences for President Vladimir Putin's regime.
Follow @politicaltickerFollow @jhseher
"President Obama said that Russia would face 'costs' if it intervened militarily in Ukraine," McCain said. "It is now essential for the President to articulate exactly what those costs will be and to take steps urgently to impose them."
On Saturday, Obama spoke by phone with Putin for 90 minutes, and expressed "his deep concern over Russia's clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity," according to a statement released by the White House.
Putin requested and received unanimous approval from Russia's upper house of Parliament to send Russian military forces into Crimea to secure the lives of Russian citizens and military personnel he says have been threatened.
Despite a flurry of activity Saturday in Washington, including a confab of the President's national security team, the White House remained mum on how the United States intended to respond to the situation.
A member of the Senate Armed Services and Senate Foreign Relations Committee, McCain called Russia's actions an "ongoing military intervention" that would only worsen in severity so long as the President and the international community sit on the sidelines.
"Every moment the United States and our allies fail to respond sends the signal to President Putin that he can be even more ambitious and aggressive in his military intervention in Ukraine," McCain said.
McCain, the President's former Republican rival in the 2008 presidential election, has routinely criticized the Obama administration's foreign policy, painting the White House as rudderless in their dealings with other nations.
In a February interview with a Phoenix radio station, the Arizona senator branded Obama as "the most naive president in history," sentiments he echoed Saturday.
"None of us should be under any illusion about what President Putin is capable of doing in Ukraine," McCain said.
President's foreign policy a favorite GOP target
McCain's pronouncement was one of a growing number of GOP statements demanding the White House act on Ukraine, but only the latest in a long line of Republicans taking aim at the president's foreign policy.
Now in his sixth year as commander in chief, the President has tried, mostly to no avail, to quiet a constant din of skeptics questioning his overseas priorities. His moves to end the war in Iraq and draw down the U.S. presence in Afghanistan reflect the Obama administration's evolving policy goals.
But the White House's handling last year of Syria's spiraling civil war renewed questions over whether Washington had abdicated its leadership role in world affairs and Obama was content to "lead from behind."
At January's World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Secretary of State John Kerry protested that reports of America's demise as a foreign policy power were greatly exaggerated.
"I am perplexed by claims that I occasionally hear that somehow America is disengaging from the world - this myth that we are pulling back or giving up or standing down," Kerry said. "I want to make it clear today that nothing could be further from the truth."
But a September CNN/ORC reflects a disconnect between the administration's words and the public's perceptions; only four in 10 Americans approved of the President's handling of foreign policy, the lowest level ever recorded on that issue in CNN polling.
According to a CBS News/New York Times poll released Wednesday, Obama's ratings on foreign affairs have yet to recover in the face of a new crisis. The survey found 39% of Americans currently approve of his approach to foreign policy.
Rubio: Time to punish Russia
The President's vulnerability on the issue has sparked a flurry of criticism, including from a potential Republican 2016 presidential contender. In an op-ed published Saturday morning in Politico, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, enumerated eight steps he believes Obama "must take to punish Russia" for encroaching on Ukraine's sovereign territory. Rubio framed the ongoing crisis as "a critical moment in world history."
"The credibility of the alliances and security assurances that have preserved the international order is at stake," Rubio said in the piece. "If Putin's illegal actions are allowed to stand unpunished, it will usher in a dark and dangerous era in world affairs."
"The President must now accept that the only way to deal with tyrants like Vladimir Putin is with a clear understanding that they can't be trusted and that only decisive action will deter their provocative moves," Rubio wrote.
Though Rubio and other 2016 hopefuls might use Ukraine's plight to bolster their foreign policy bona fides, their calls for decisive action have limited real world recourse.
As the rhetoric on both sides of the aisle escalates, the United States and its European allies have limited options - short of engaging the military - for impacting the situation on the ground in Ukraine.
The lack of avenues available to the administration did not silence the GOP's rancor.
Ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tennessee, said Obama must "lead a meaningful, unified response" to the crisis, something he has thus far failed to do.
"The Russian government has felt free to intervene militarily in Ukraine because the United States," Corker said in a statement, "along with Europe, has failed to make clear there would be serious, potentially irreparable consequences to such action."
Corker said Congress would consider targeted sanctions against Russia but pressed again for immediate action from the White House.
"The United States and our European allies should immediately bring to bear all elements of our collective economic strength to stop Russian advances in Ukraine," he said.
Warning about standing on the sideline
The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Buck McKeon, R-California, painted the administration's hesitance to intervene in even starker terms.
"History judges perpetrators of these actions poorly, as it does those who stand idly by," McKeon said in a statement. "Our response should demonstrate the U.S. stands by its friends against bullies."
Calling Putin a would-be empire builder whose actions are a "throwback" to the Cold War, McKeon continued, saying Russia's military maneuvering has "violated the freedom of all Ukrainians."
Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, gave perhaps the most cutting critique of the Obama administration's response.
"Emboldened by President Obama's trembling inaction, Vladimir Putin has invaded the Crimea region of Ukraine," Cotton, who sits on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, said in a statement.
Cotton, the GOP challenger for incumbent Democrat Mark Pryor's senate seat, sketched out a series of potential actions President Obama could take against Russia should they not withdraw from the Crimea: revoking travel visas, freezing assets of senior Russian officials, rescheduling the G-8 summit in Sochi, suspending Russia from the forum of governments, and recalling the U.S. ambassador to Russia.
"Putin must be punished for his outlaw actions and the Russian people and elites must recognize they will pay a price for them," Cotton said.
Still, the Arkansas lawmaker believes the fate of Ukraine hangs in the balance.
"The hours ahead will decide whether this invasion of Crimea is repelled or expanded to the whole of Ukraine, and whether the West finally confronts Putin or again blinks in disgrace," he said.
First I think this thing is a mess. Second the President was elected in an open and fair election in the Ukraine. The rebels or protestors in essence staged a coup. Did Obama protest? No because the protesters were pro-West;i.e. EU.
Third Obama actually threatens Russia with " COSTS ". What are these " COSTS "? Obama is the biggest bully on the block in talk only. Egypt, Syria and Iran just a few examples. What a mess with have there. Fourth I think this issue can be worked out into a vote by area on unity to the Ukraine or Russia.
Once again Obama has botched this up. He and Hillary Clinton have led THE WORST foreign policy ever!!!
what about our trips to the ISS?
Republicans just want Obama to state a policy so they can begin to undermine it right away.
The government was shut down by not changing certain parts of the ACA, which changes the Democratic President made any way after the shut down. Tell it like is really is!!! The shut down never would have happened.
Ted Cruz and 80 republicans in congress demanded that ACA would be completely repealed or they would shut down government. You don't remember the GOBaggers cheering when they shut it down? Of course you do.
It would be very, very bad for Republicans to politicize this situation. This is a time to work to help the President solve problems – rather than obstruct all progress and make up ridiculous conspiracies. It's a good time to behave like a patriotic American once again.
Obama doesn't have the spine to act. He is the weakest president in history, even weaker than Carter. Assad in Syria simply ignored the 'red line' knowing Obama would do nothing. Putin can call any Obama bluff at his whim.
The ONLY (weak) card the US has is to with hold wheat.
It's ridiculous for anyone to propose that the US take action on this issue. This is Russia's backyard and over half of the Ukraine is composed of people who speak Russian and consider themselves Russian. It was ridiculous and absurd for the US to secretly intervene and give support to those who overthrew Yanokovitch. It's easy to see what would happen next. Maybe the Republicans will remember what happened when Georgia's President was encouraged to stand up to Russia and how much support George W. Bush gave to him when Russia responded. It's like the Republicans in Congress have amnesia on these issues.
If Russia chooses to operate this way, turn them into the pariah state they deserve to be. Kick Russia out of the G-8. Impose economic sanctions on anyone doing business with Russia/Russian companies. Let them know this is not how the world works in 2014.
Easy for the GOP.....as they don't have a dog in this fight. Putin is just consolidating his power base, which is slowly crumbling under scrutiny from the Ukraine area he has little control over, except the region which houses one of his major military assets, especially the naval ones. What is Obama supposed to do? If this happened in an area of the world where one of our major bases was threatened, especially a naval one I'd think the same thing Putin is doing right now would be what we might consider doing. It's a lose/lose proposition.
what is the UN for....do you want to go to war again....over this
The "lazy, incompetent president" you refer to has gotten all of our troops out of Iraq and almost all of them out of Afghanistan. Meanwhile his predecessor spent well over a trillion dollars doing the opposite and accomplished nothing. If big mouth McCain has won the 2998 election we would have invaded Iran, Libya, and god knows where else and the population would probably be in open revolt. If Stuffitu is so inclined I'm sure the military could arrange to send him into Crimea where he can singlehandedly destroy Putin's army.
The US could finally more on Syria and Iran in response – things Russia wouldn't like much, and/or the new Ukrainian gov't could invite NATO in immediately. Could end up a nuclear crisis – is this battle worth it? Is that what the GOP advocates?
Despite the fact that our planet Is ringed with hair-trigger nuclear weapons, we are ruled by people-Democrat and Republican-whose minds are not fully developed.
Whatever the President does the reaction of the Republicans will be to criticize. This is a non story. CNN, run a story when the Republicans actually support what the President does. Cotton needs to shut his mouth. He knows little of what Obama is thinking. Obama isn't going to shoot first and ask questions later. That is the problem of the Republicans. They are quick reactors to situations and don't know how to think a situation out.
GOP calls for actionl but looks at Cotton's suggestion, cutting off communication. What would the GOP do, go to war? They are so completely partisan that it makes the GOP a liability to America. The GOP back-stabbing is typoical, and it is tearing the country apart. Back-stabbing is what you do when you can't advance on your own merits, so you tear down those around you. GOP – the party of the Rich, the party of Religion, the party of Back-stabbing.
GOP calls on Obama to act. Until he does, then they will say acting was the wrong thing to do. I seem to remember them calling on him to act in Libya. They demanded a no fly zone and called Obama lots of nice things because he wouldn't act. Then the US/Europe/NATO/UN/Arab League all met and came up with a united plan for a no fly zone. The next day Republicans wanted Obama impeached for starting a war without their permission.
After four years it's very clear that it doesn't matter what position Obama takes on any subject, Republicans will always choose the opposite stance even if was their stance the day before.
hello hello hello is the GOP sane any more?
Mr. President: Do something we can complain about.
I hate this discussion board, it denies me participating in public forum. who runs this forum and why is my speech always "moderated"?
The first rule should be sons and daughters of Congress and Senate get to go first.
which democrats demand action? almost all. cnn=fail.
Why is it always a race card?. The president can't do anything without you tea bagger bringing up the race card.
Go home Senator McCain.
Where was the most incompetent laxiest ineffective president? Out of office ad bush stopped being president years ago.
The party of NO wants action NOW. Well, what do they suggest? Probably nothing., but they want action now. McCain and the rest of the stuffed shirts of the GOP probably want war. Thankfully we have a grown up in the WH that will seek other means to de-escalate the situation. It will take Obama working with Cameron, Merkel, and others to get it done. It is a world problem, not a US problem. But the rightwingnuts do not and will not see it that way.