Updated 9:29 p.m. ET 4/24/2014
(CNN) - What started out as a standoff over land rights may be turning into a controversy over race.
Racist comments from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy - who earlier this month appeared to win a highly publicized standoff against federal authorities over his two-decade long illegal grazing of cattle on public land - are giving Democrats a new weapon to attack some top Republicans who earlier came to Bundy's defense.
Follow @LACaldwellDC Follow @KilloughCNN Follow @psteinhausercnnFollow @politicalticker
And the controversial comments also call into question moves by Fox News and some other conservative media that highlighted the story and painted Bundy as a hero in his battle against federal authorities.
Bundy, 67, won his standoff against federal rangers after armed militiamen came to his side. Even with the incident over, Bundy continued to talk to a dwindling crowd of media from his ranch, about 100 miles northeast of Las Vegas.
The comments that sparked the latest controversy came this weekend when Bundy recalled to supporters about a time he drove by a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, according to a report from The New York Times.
"I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro," Bundy said, "and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids - and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch - they didn't have nothing to do. They didn't have nothing for their kids to do. They didn't have nothing for their young girls to do.
"And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?" Bundy continued. "They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I've often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn't get no more freedom. They got less freedom."
What Cliven Bundy's comments on race reveal
In a press conference Thursday, Bundy defended and repeated his comments but emphasized he was merely "wondering" whether African-Americans were better off as slaves.
"And that's a question I put before the world: Are they better, or were they better then? I'm not saying I thought they should be slaves, or I wasn't even saying they was (sic) better off; I'm wondering if they're better off," he said.
Bundy said he questions whether those living under government subsidies are living as slaves to the state, but denied he held racist views.
"I might not have a very big word base or vocabulary, I guess, but let me tell you something: When I say slavery, I mean slavery...Slavery is about when you take away choices from people, and where you have forced labor," he said. "You think that's what I'm about, America? If it is, you're sure wrong, because I don't believe in any type of that stuff."
And Bundy didn't back down in an interview Thursday night with CNN's Bill Weir. He questioned whether blacks are better off now when "they don't have nothing to do with their children, their family unit is ruined (and) I don't think they have the life that they should have."
"I don't think I'm wrong," he told CNN, insisting that he'd spoken "from my heart." "I think I'm right."
Asked whether he was any more or less a "welfare queen" as those who get entitlement checks - since his cattle have been feeding off the government, literally, by eating grass on public land - Bundy said, "I might be a welfare queen, but I'll tell you I'm producing something for America and using a resource that nobody else would use or could use."
He said, "I'm putting red meat on your table. Maybe I'm not doing enough, but I'm trying."
'Comments are completely beyond the pale'
Thursday morning, hours after The New York Times story went viral, the Nevada Democratic Party put out a statement saying "These comments are reprehensible, and every Republican politician in the state of Nevada who tried to latch on to Cliven Bundy's newfound celebrity with TEA Partiers and the militia movement should be ashamed of their actions."
"Every Republican elected official who risked inciting violence to gain political capital out of Cliven Bundy now owes the people of Nevada an apology for their irresponsible behavior of putting their own political future ahead of the safety of Nevadans," added the Nevada Democrats.
Some top national Republicans quickly condemned the remarks.
Sen. Rand Paul, who originally supported Bundy's case, issued a statement Thursday morning decrying Bundy's racial comments.
"His remarks on race are offensive and I wholeheartedly disagree with him," said the Kentucky Republican, who's seriously considering a 2016 presidential run.
GOP Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada, who earlier called his supporters "patriots", also "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy's appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way," according to his spokesperson, Chandler Smith.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who had not previously weighed in on the land dispute, said in a statement that "Bundy's comments are completely beyond the pale. Both highly offensive and 100% wrong on race."
Democrats had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – Nevada's senior senator - last week blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
One man, former Arizona sheriff Richard Mack told a reporter the militia were considering putting "all the women" on the front lines.
"If they're going to start shooting, it's going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers," he said.
Questions about media coverage
Some conservative-leaning pundits painted Bundy as an anti-goverment hero. Fox News' Sean Hannity was criticized by liberal media outlets for frequently hosting Bundy on his television program and appearing to defend the rancher.
Hannity said Thursday on his radio show that Bundy's "comments are beyond repugnant to me."
"They are beyond despicable to me. They are beyond ignorant to me," he said, adding that his interest in Bundy's case was entirely about government overreach.
He also chided what he called the liberal media, arguing that they ignore racist comments by Democrats and only focus on Republicans.
"Every conservative I know does not support racism, period," he said.
Another Fox News host, Greta Van Susteren, wrote on her blog Thursday morning that she condemns Bundy's comments.
Others had previously warned fellow conservatives not to get too fired up about the Nevada dispute. Conservative host Glenn Beck said on his show that "10 or 15 percent" of the people who were defending Bundy online were saying things "that are truly frightening."
"They don't care what the facts are," he said. "They just want a fight."
Tucker Carlson, founder of the conservative news outlet the Daily Caller, said on Fox that he sympathizes with the Bundys, but "it's important to point out that this land does not belong to them and that's not a minor distinction, it's the essence of private property."
For his part, Sen. Paul had also cautioned both sides, including Reid, to calm their rhetoric.
"Let's try to have a peaceful resolution to this," he said last week on Fox News.
While Republicans are now trying to distance themselves from Bundy, that's not stopping Democrats from going after them for supporting Bundy in the first place. And the Democratic National Committee says the incident is "more evidence of the shallowness of the GOP's outreach efforts."
"Remember Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson? His racist comments last December were in the same vein as Bundy's. Yet GOP leaders from Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Lindsey Graham, and others rushed to defend (Robertson's) comments against a liberal assault. Republicans even invited the Duck Dynasty stars as their guests to the State of the Union!," wrote DNC Communications Director Mo Elleithee.
"And therein lies the GOP's problem. If you ever want to be taken seriously for your outreach efforts, you might want to start by not defending racists," Elleithee added.
Battle over land rights
The Bundy standoff is emblematic of the larger anti-government sentiment around the country that has been amplified with the creation of the tea party movement in 2009. But the latest move in a two-decade-long tug of war between Bundy and the federal government is bringing to light the delicate balance that has lasted between citizens in the West and the federal government over the use of federally owned land for generations.
What made Nevada rancher fight the feds?
One protester from neighboring Utah, Stephen L. Dean, 45, called the Bureau of Land Management's actions "tyranny in government." And a banner at the protest site blared: "Has the West been won? Or has the fight just begun!"
In the western states, public lands are a big deal. Almost everyone uses them or depends on them. They are key to people's recreational hiking, fishing, hunting and skiing. And they are critical to people's livelihood, as they are used to cut timber, drill oil, mine coal and ranch cattle.
Vast swaths of the land in the West are predominately public. In Nevada, for example, 87% of the state is owned by the federal government, and the Bureau of Land Management oversees 245 million acres of public lands mostly west of the Mississippi River, not including the lands overseen by the National Forest Service and half a dozen other federal agencies.
In Nevada, ranchers depend on the federal lands for their livelihood. The government began allowing the use of the land in 1877 to promote the economic development of dry, difficult-to-cultivate desert areas. So it offered land for dirt cheap. Bundy says his family has owned the ranch since about the time the Desert Land Act passed.
A version of the law still exists today, allowing ranchers to graze their cattle on public lands for a nominal rate. The fee is cheaper than what the rancher would pay the state or a private land owner, but the tradeoff is that the rancher has to share the land with the public.
After the desert tortoise became a protected species in 1993, the Bureau of Land Management rebuked or phased out the permits of ranchers in the designated area in southern Nevada.
Bundy is the last remaining rancher, refusing to leave and refusing to pay more than $1 million worth of fines. Bundy lost all efforts at appeal and litigation. In an effort to enforce the law, the BLM attempted to round up Bundy's cattle and was met with a clan of armed defenders, leading to the current stalemate between the government and Bundy.
The Nevada Democrat had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Last week the state's senior senator blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
Someone made a great comparison....this is very similar to the Whiskey Rebellion. These so called patriots are nothing but hypocrites.
This article does not say anything about Mr Bundy's right to his free speech at all. This article points out how time after time when the conservative Tea Baggers get behind one of these yokels with a gun they ultimately show that the party's base is full of gun toting racists at its core. The article also points out how this Clive Bundy guy feels entitled to the land OWNED and SHARED by the people of AMERICA for free. While mocking "entitled" negro's living off the government teat, somehow when he does it ( to the tune of over 1 million dollars that Nevada could use to improve water systems and irrigation) it is alright? This guy and his armed mob should be disarmed and jailed or shot on site by the government end of story. We are a nation of laws, idiots who steal from the rest of us, do not deserve a microphone if they cannot see their own hypocrisy when degrading other groups of Americans.
So what's the big deal? The guys a freeloader who should be in jail and now the racist party of Bonehead and Cruz and Palin are trying to backtrack. The racist party is only out for one thing and its the 1%. What we really need to do is hold the greedy boys accountable for the stealing from workers.
not knowing that you are a racist, and not being a racist...are not the same thing.
"I guess Bundy has never in his life seen white people sitting around doing nothing. There are millions of them"
Yes, but you see, as far as the typical GOPer/Teatroll is concerned, when white people do it, they're victims of the gov't and blah blah blah...but when the "others" do it, they're lazy, feckless mooches who simply "refuse to get a job."
Hows that foot taste republicans? This is just a typical Tea Party member, they are filled with ignorance, hate, and hypocrisy.
hahaha It's not denying the legitimacy of the federal govt. It's not the fact he hasn't paid what he owes like the rest of us. It's not the fact that he and his family and friends threatened to meet the BLM with violence. The disingenuous republican party, the party self-voted as the most capable of discerning patriotism, draws the line at a hillbilly in a cowboy hat making racist remarks. Because they rebranded and everything. Gotta keep up that outreach!
Another racist k00k and he's been associated with the GOP??!! No really??!! I'm shocked! ( rolls eyes )
What's the point, GOP? Your voters think the same way. Those who vote against you know this.
Ghandi was a racist and with far worse views of black people, yet that doesn't negate all the good Ghandi did. Obama was against gay marriage till it became politically expedient for him to change his views, yet the left didn't decide that all his views are evil because of it.
Bundy certainly seems to be racist, that doesn't mean he's wrong about his dispute with the government.
Not all Republicans are racists, but all racists are Republicans!
America is in peril, not from liberals but from the right wing. If there were another economic depression, it would be possible that the far right takes over as in 30s Germany.
Hilarious how many nutters just latched onto Bundy, a man who openly has stated he does not recognize the US government. How patriotic of them.
Way to go GOP! Now your latest poster boy shows himself to be a cheatin, no-good, yellow-bellly racist. Salute your hero Hannity! Shine his shoes O'Reilly!
Government infringes on mans constitutional rights. Man makes distastful comment. Now the story is about the comment, not about constitutional rights. No wonder the press pushed the PC issue, it helps them take the people's eyes off the laws and illegal government.
Does not surprise me one bit what he said. Just like some of these racist comments do not surprise me. I think some white Americans are afraid because they will cease to be the majority in our country. Racism is wrong and sinful no matter what color or ethic group one belongs to. We are all human beings, no one is better than any other human being. Remember there is only one Heaven and one hell, decide which one you want to go to.
@Uhmerica – You are also free to worship this racist as a hero if you like.
Well, we all knew the race card would be pulled out eventually.
Why not focus back to why the Federal Government goes after a citizen with all the weapons they did for supposed back taxes on some made up fee even though the family has lived there since 1875 Yet if he was some millionaire that owed back taxes it would not be handled the same way.
Anyone who drives through the black part of town knows there is much truth in what he said.
"And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do"
Isn't grazing his cattle for free on publicly owned land also getting a government subsidy? I guess it's OK when he gets a subsidy and other freebies but not when others get one.
"Wasn't using the word in a bad way." Hmm are you people delusional? Words are words and he is a racist plain and simple. Amazing some of you support this stuff. Came a long way and no we didn't we are still stuck in the racist past,.
So I don't get it....let the guy graze his cattle there, IF he pays the fees/fines...BUT since he refuses to, the government has to seize his cattle, same as if I don't pay taxes the IRS seizes my wages. I'm not sure on what premise anyone is defending this guy, he broke the law, and has never paid the fees. I can understand letting him continue to use the land, BUT if he's not gonna pay for it - which is what the law originally and always stated BEFORE they repealed it, then he sacrifices that right to use of the land regardless of anything else. I mean seriously if I owed the gov't $1 million bucks for unpaid fees/fines I'd be in jail. Why does he get to get away with it?
Typical Right Wing Hero, racist, hypocritical and armed. Guess all those people on government assistance should get a gun, go build homes on federal land and enslave white people.
George, I should be telling that to all the conservatives who say "race card" whenever someone speaks and it is not exactly what they want to hear. Conservatives, you don't like it when people say the words "racism" or "racist." Do you know about the Golden Rule? Will you stop saying things about other people that they don't like?
Any this man is not in jail because?