Updated 9:29 p.m. ET 4/24/2014
(CNN) - What started out as a standoff over land rights may be turning into a controversy over race.
Racist comments from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy - who earlier this month appeared to win a highly publicized standoff against federal authorities over his two-decade long illegal grazing of cattle on public land - are giving Democrats a new weapon to attack some top Republicans who earlier came to Bundy's defense.
Follow @LACaldwellDC Follow @KilloughCNN Follow @psteinhausercnnFollow @politicalticker
And the controversial comments also call into question moves by Fox News and some other conservative media that highlighted the story and painted Bundy as a hero in his battle against federal authorities.
Bundy, 67, won his standoff against federal rangers after armed militiamen came to his side. Even with the incident over, Bundy continued to talk to a dwindling crowd of media from his ranch, about 100 miles northeast of Las Vegas.
The comments that sparked the latest controversy came this weekend when Bundy recalled to supporters about a time he drove by a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, according to a report from The New York Times.
"I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro," Bundy said, "and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids - and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch - they didn't have nothing to do. They didn't have nothing for their kids to do. They didn't have nothing for their young girls to do.
"And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?" Bundy continued. "They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I've often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn't get no more freedom. They got less freedom."
What Cliven Bundy's comments on race reveal
In a press conference Thursday, Bundy defended and repeated his comments but emphasized he was merely "wondering" whether African-Americans were better off as slaves.
"And that's a question I put before the world: Are they better, or were they better then? I'm not saying I thought they should be slaves, or I wasn't even saying they was (sic) better off; I'm wondering if they're better off," he said.
Bundy said he questions whether those living under government subsidies are living as slaves to the state, but denied he held racist views.
"I might not have a very big word base or vocabulary, I guess, but let me tell you something: When I say slavery, I mean slavery...Slavery is about when you take away choices from people, and where you have forced labor," he said. "You think that's what I'm about, America? If it is, you're sure wrong, because I don't believe in any type of that stuff."
And Bundy didn't back down in an interview Thursday night with CNN's Bill Weir. He questioned whether blacks are better off now when "they don't have nothing to do with their children, their family unit is ruined (and) I don't think they have the life that they should have."
"I don't think I'm wrong," he told CNN, insisting that he'd spoken "from my heart." "I think I'm right."
Asked whether he was any more or less a "welfare queen" as those who get entitlement checks - since his cattle have been feeding off the government, literally, by eating grass on public land - Bundy said, "I might be a welfare queen, but I'll tell you I'm producing something for America and using a resource that nobody else would use or could use."
He said, "I'm putting red meat on your table. Maybe I'm not doing enough, but I'm trying."
'Comments are completely beyond the pale'
Thursday morning, hours after The New York Times story went viral, the Nevada Democratic Party put out a statement saying "These comments are reprehensible, and every Republican politician in the state of Nevada who tried to latch on to Cliven Bundy's newfound celebrity with TEA Partiers and the militia movement should be ashamed of their actions."
"Every Republican elected official who risked inciting violence to gain political capital out of Cliven Bundy now owes the people of Nevada an apology for their irresponsible behavior of putting their own political future ahead of the safety of Nevadans," added the Nevada Democrats.
Some top national Republicans quickly condemned the remarks.
Sen. Rand Paul, who originally supported Bundy's case, issued a statement Thursday morning decrying Bundy's racial comments.
"His remarks on race are offensive and I wholeheartedly disagree with him," said the Kentucky Republican, who's seriously considering a 2016 presidential run.
GOP Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada, who earlier called his supporters "patriots", also "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy's appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way," according to his spokesperson, Chandler Smith.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who had not previously weighed in on the land dispute, said in a statement that "Bundy's comments are completely beyond the pale. Both highly offensive and 100% wrong on race."
Democrats had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – Nevada's senior senator - last week blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
One man, former Arizona sheriff Richard Mack told a reporter the militia were considering putting "all the women" on the front lines.
"If they're going to start shooting, it's going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers," he said.
Questions about media coverage
Some conservative-leaning pundits painted Bundy as an anti-goverment hero. Fox News' Sean Hannity was criticized by liberal media outlets for frequently hosting Bundy on his television program and appearing to defend the rancher.
Hannity said Thursday on his radio show that Bundy's "comments are beyond repugnant to me."
"They are beyond despicable to me. They are beyond ignorant to me," he said, adding that his interest in Bundy's case was entirely about government overreach.
He also chided what he called the liberal media, arguing that they ignore racist comments by Democrats and only focus on Republicans.
"Every conservative I know does not support racism, period," he said.
Another Fox News host, Greta Van Susteren, wrote on her blog Thursday morning that she condemns Bundy's comments.
Others had previously warned fellow conservatives not to get too fired up about the Nevada dispute. Conservative host Glenn Beck said on his show that "10 or 15 percent" of the people who were defending Bundy online were saying things "that are truly frightening."
"They don't care what the facts are," he said. "They just want a fight."
Tucker Carlson, founder of the conservative news outlet the Daily Caller, said on Fox that he sympathizes with the Bundys, but "it's important to point out that this land does not belong to them and that's not a minor distinction, it's the essence of private property."
For his part, Sen. Paul had also cautioned both sides, including Reid, to calm their rhetoric.
"Let's try to have a peaceful resolution to this," he said last week on Fox News.
While Republicans are now trying to distance themselves from Bundy, that's not stopping Democrats from going after them for supporting Bundy in the first place. And the Democratic National Committee says the incident is "more evidence of the shallowness of the GOP's outreach efforts."
"Remember Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson? His racist comments last December were in the same vein as Bundy's. Yet GOP leaders from Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Lindsey Graham, and others rushed to defend (Robertson's) comments against a liberal assault. Republicans even invited the Duck Dynasty stars as their guests to the State of the Union!," wrote DNC Communications Director Mo Elleithee.
"And therein lies the GOP's problem. If you ever want to be taken seriously for your outreach efforts, you might want to start by not defending racists," Elleithee added.
Battle over land rights
The Bundy standoff is emblematic of the larger anti-government sentiment around the country that has been amplified with the creation of the tea party movement in 2009. But the latest move in a two-decade-long tug of war between Bundy and the federal government is bringing to light the delicate balance that has lasted between citizens in the West and the federal government over the use of federally owned land for generations.
What made Nevada rancher fight the feds?
One protester from neighboring Utah, Stephen L. Dean, 45, called the Bureau of Land Management's actions "tyranny in government." And a banner at the protest site blared: "Has the West been won? Or has the fight just begun!"
In the western states, public lands are a big deal. Almost everyone uses them or depends on them. They are key to people's recreational hiking, fishing, hunting and skiing. And they are critical to people's livelihood, as they are used to cut timber, drill oil, mine coal and ranch cattle.
Vast swaths of the land in the West are predominately public. In Nevada, for example, 87% of the state is owned by the federal government, and the Bureau of Land Management oversees 245 million acres of public lands mostly west of the Mississippi River, not including the lands overseen by the National Forest Service and half a dozen other federal agencies.
In Nevada, ranchers depend on the federal lands for their livelihood. The government began allowing the use of the land in 1877 to promote the economic development of dry, difficult-to-cultivate desert areas. So it offered land for dirt cheap. Bundy says his family has owned the ranch since about the time the Desert Land Act passed.
A version of the law still exists today, allowing ranchers to graze their cattle on public lands for a nominal rate. The fee is cheaper than what the rancher would pay the state or a private land owner, but the tradeoff is that the rancher has to share the land with the public.
After the desert tortoise became a protected species in 1993, the Bureau of Land Management rebuked or phased out the permits of ranchers in the designated area in southern Nevada.
Bundy is the last remaining rancher, refusing to leave and refusing to pay more than $1 million worth of fines. Bundy lost all efforts at appeal and litigation. In an effort to enforce the law, the BLM attempted to round up Bundy's cattle and was met with a clan of armed defenders, leading to the current stalemate between the government and Bundy.
The Nevada Democrat had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Last week the state's senior senator blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
Bundy is a racist and Fox News was willing to support hinm until it became politically inconvenient. How is your day going, Mr hannity?
It is amusing when the Left can find someone that they can vent all of their hostility upon. I don't know who Bundy is, nor do I care. What concerns me is the reaction of the liberals, the same people who tell us that we should be tolerant of other viewpoints, except those they disagree with. The Liberals on this forum want to do the same thing to Bundy that the KKK and segregationists did to African-Americans in the early and mid part of the 20th century.
Now our remember why I bought all of those guns.
why is it racist to suggest that blacks are inherently capable of taking actions to improve themselves but not racist to assume that they're not?
The man is a liar. His family hasn't owned the land since around when the Desert land act was passed in 1877 His parents bought the land in 1948 and They began to run cattle in the 1950s.. And he is a nasty racist.
Bundy+ right wing welfare king LOL
I get a real kick out of the folks who deny that Bundy said what he said. Or that ex sheriff Mack said what he said about hiding behind women. They are trying to take a page out of the Taliban playbook..
I also get a kick out of those that portray Bundy as a hero. He's a crook. Hypocrite? The whole time he's denying the existence of the federal government, there are American flags flying behind him.
The armed insurrectionist wannabes? They're anarchists spoiling for a fight and their 15 minutes of fame.
This won't end well. And all of it will be over a racist scammer and a bunch of folks who would welcome a bloody nose. They'll get one.
I'm sure Fox misnews will find a way to blame this on Obama
So a guy feeds his cattle for free off the government teat and that is a man's rights. However food stamps for kids and they would be better off as slaves. GOP needs to go. Enough is enough of you old white racist. Don't think they are? Why are all the southern states red?
We criticize a south Korean boat captain for not going down with the ship and making sure women and children get off the boat first. We are disgusted when Al-Qaeda used women as human shields. But, in America, we celebrate this moron as a Tea Party Patriot – pretty disgusting!
This is BS because everybody knows the Republicans are racist and now they are pretending they aren't.. Only the Democrats aren't racist they may not like white folk but that ain't racist.
Funny how Sniffit agrees with Hillary Clinton that the news reporting is all sensationalistic and then gloms on to this story. Now this, THIS is truly newsworthy. I know that they had barely even covered this story on CNN but now that there is a racial overtone (somewhat) it becomes credible and newsworthy for Sniffit to comment 20+ times. But there's no hypocrisy there, Sniffit. None whatsoever.
@ Dominican mama:
"The only use this type of person is to me is for comic relief."
I've been reading through the comments trying to choose the best fit for Clive Bundy. So far "Welfare Rancher" tops the list ... but, boy oh boy ... there are so many nifty comments I find that picking a winner is serious business indeed.
Nbody's accused these teaparty rightwing zealots of being smart. So here's the proof.
He' breaking the law, plain and simple.
He equated 19th century slavery to present day slavery which is what the government has implemented through social programs and bs laws. He's thoughts are not racist. Granted, some of the words he used to convey his thoughts were crude, he makes a valid point, we are slaves to our Government and the African American community more so than the rest of us. The government implemented these policies to keep most of us impoverished and enslaved and the left media calls them champions. God help us all.
Hey, if there is ever a conflict between right and wrong, the left always plays the race card.
So what's the problem. I know the Old Testament owned media constantly portrays the heroic black man from saving the day from the bumbling evil white Idiots to divide whites, but have any of you actually had to live near black people.
I wonder if his comments hit a nerve with the Government. If his comments were made about people in general and not by racial inclusion he would be right? Governments think they do all that they can do but what they do is actually no different than the Kings of old. They dictate, take, lie, cheat and sit on a fence all in the gise of freedom?
"I'm sure Fox misnews will find a way to blame this on Obama"
Just went to the site. "Cliven Bundy under Fire for Racial Comments" is the headline. No mention of Obama. Oh, and for all of the people that have said that the site doesn't allow comments, you all were wrong about that too.
BUNDY is the face of the new racist REPUBLICAN TEA PARTY. now wonder Republican congressmen like Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Dean Heller rallied around him.
So hate meister Sean Hannity gets caught with his hand on the bullwhip. You gotta love this..
So a Republican supports Mr. Bundy for a political view that he has, and then he LATER expresses another opinion that he had yet to express, that Republican must automatically be associated with both views?
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND BARACK OBAMA'S FORMER PASTOR JEREMIAH WRIGHT?? Barack listened to Rev. Wright for years, he came out as a racist and only then did Barack distance himself. The aforementioned Republicans knew only one expressed view of Mr. Bundy and only for a very short time, with no direct contact or interaction with the man. I'd say the relationship of Mr. Obama was much worse.
BUNDY is the face of the new racist Republican Tea Party. No wonder Republican congressmen like Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Dean Heller rallied around him.
Don't forget, democrats... Your furor's former pastor was a racist, too.
Tom in Millstadt
What kind of things were slaves "out doing"as a family? What kind of "family life" did slaves really have? Where did Bundy get his history books?
From Ted Nugent and Sean Hannity
More likely from the works of W. Cleon Skousen- a favorite of John Birchers and the ilk. He promoted the idea that Blacks thrived under slavery and should have remained in servitude.