Updated 9:29 p.m. ET 4/24/2014
(CNN) - What started out as a standoff over land rights may be turning into a controversy over race.
Racist comments from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy - who earlier this month appeared to win a highly publicized standoff against federal authorities over his two-decade long illegal grazing of cattle on public land - are giving Democrats a new weapon to attack some top Republicans who earlier came to Bundy's defense.
Follow @LACaldwellDC Follow @KilloughCNN Follow @psteinhausercnnFollow @politicalticker
And the controversial comments also call into question moves by Fox News and some other conservative media that highlighted the story and painted Bundy as a hero in his battle against federal authorities.
Bundy, 67, won his standoff against federal rangers after armed militiamen came to his side. Even with the incident over, Bundy continued to talk to a dwindling crowd of media from his ranch, about 100 miles northeast of Las Vegas.
The comments that sparked the latest controversy came this weekend when Bundy recalled to supporters about a time he drove by a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, according to a report from The New York Times.
"I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro," Bundy said, "and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids - and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch - they didn't have nothing to do. They didn't have nothing for their kids to do. They didn't have nothing for their young girls to do.
"And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?" Bundy continued. "They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I've often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn't get no more freedom. They got less freedom."
What Cliven Bundy's comments on race reveal
In a press conference Thursday, Bundy defended and repeated his comments but emphasized he was merely "wondering" whether African-Americans were better off as slaves.
"And that's a question I put before the world: Are they better, or were they better then? I'm not saying I thought they should be slaves, or I wasn't even saying they was (sic) better off; I'm wondering if they're better off," he said.
Bundy said he questions whether those living under government subsidies are living as slaves to the state, but denied he held racist views.
"I might not have a very big word base or vocabulary, I guess, but let me tell you something: When I say slavery, I mean slavery...Slavery is about when you take away choices from people, and where you have forced labor," he said. "You think that's what I'm about, America? If it is, you're sure wrong, because I don't believe in any type of that stuff."
And Bundy didn't back down in an interview Thursday night with CNN's Bill Weir. He questioned whether blacks are better off now when "they don't have nothing to do with their children, their family unit is ruined (and) I don't think they have the life that they should have."
"I don't think I'm wrong," he told CNN, insisting that he'd spoken "from my heart." "I think I'm right."
Asked whether he was any more or less a "welfare queen" as those who get entitlement checks - since his cattle have been feeding off the government, literally, by eating grass on public land - Bundy said, "I might be a welfare queen, but I'll tell you I'm producing something for America and using a resource that nobody else would use or could use."
He said, "I'm putting red meat on your table. Maybe I'm not doing enough, but I'm trying."
'Comments are completely beyond the pale'
Thursday morning, hours after The New York Times story went viral, the Nevada Democratic Party put out a statement saying "These comments are reprehensible, and every Republican politician in the state of Nevada who tried to latch on to Cliven Bundy's newfound celebrity with TEA Partiers and the militia movement should be ashamed of their actions."
"Every Republican elected official who risked inciting violence to gain political capital out of Cliven Bundy now owes the people of Nevada an apology for their irresponsible behavior of putting their own political future ahead of the safety of Nevadans," added the Nevada Democrats.
Some top national Republicans quickly condemned the remarks.
Sen. Rand Paul, who originally supported Bundy's case, issued a statement Thursday morning decrying Bundy's racial comments.
"His remarks on race are offensive and I wholeheartedly disagree with him," said the Kentucky Republican, who's seriously considering a 2016 presidential run.
GOP Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada, who earlier called his supporters "patriots", also "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy's appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way," according to his spokesperson, Chandler Smith.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who had not previously weighed in on the land dispute, said in a statement that "Bundy's comments are completely beyond the pale. Both highly offensive and 100% wrong on race."
Democrats had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – Nevada's senior senator - last week blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
One man, former Arizona sheriff Richard Mack told a reporter the militia were considering putting "all the women" on the front lines.
"If they're going to start shooting, it's going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers," he said.
Questions about media coverage
Some conservative-leaning pundits painted Bundy as an anti-goverment hero. Fox News' Sean Hannity was criticized by liberal media outlets for frequently hosting Bundy on his television program and appearing to defend the rancher.
Hannity said Thursday on his radio show that Bundy's "comments are beyond repugnant to me."
"They are beyond despicable to me. They are beyond ignorant to me," he said, adding that his interest in Bundy's case was entirely about government overreach.
He also chided what he called the liberal media, arguing that they ignore racist comments by Democrats and only focus on Republicans.
"Every conservative I know does not support racism, period," he said.
Another Fox News host, Greta Van Susteren, wrote on her blog Thursday morning that she condemns Bundy's comments.
Others had previously warned fellow conservatives not to get too fired up about the Nevada dispute. Conservative host Glenn Beck said on his show that "10 or 15 percent" of the people who were defending Bundy online were saying things "that are truly frightening."
"They don't care what the facts are," he said. "They just want a fight."
Tucker Carlson, founder of the conservative news outlet the Daily Caller, said on Fox that he sympathizes with the Bundys, but "it's important to point out that this land does not belong to them and that's not a minor distinction, it's the essence of private property."
For his part, Sen. Paul had also cautioned both sides, including Reid, to calm their rhetoric.
"Let's try to have a peaceful resolution to this," he said last week on Fox News.
While Republicans are now trying to distance themselves from Bundy, that's not stopping Democrats from going after them for supporting Bundy in the first place. And the Democratic National Committee says the incident is "more evidence of the shallowness of the GOP's outreach efforts."
"Remember Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson? His racist comments last December were in the same vein as Bundy's. Yet GOP leaders from Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Lindsey Graham, and others rushed to defend (Robertson's) comments against a liberal assault. Republicans even invited the Duck Dynasty stars as their guests to the State of the Union!," wrote DNC Communications Director Mo Elleithee.
"And therein lies the GOP's problem. If you ever want to be taken seriously for your outreach efforts, you might want to start by not defending racists," Elleithee added.
Battle over land rights
The Bundy standoff is emblematic of the larger anti-government sentiment around the country that has been amplified with the creation of the tea party movement in 2009. But the latest move in a two-decade-long tug of war between Bundy and the federal government is bringing to light the delicate balance that has lasted between citizens in the West and the federal government over the use of federally owned land for generations.
What made Nevada rancher fight the feds?
One protester from neighboring Utah, Stephen L. Dean, 45, called the Bureau of Land Management's actions "tyranny in government." And a banner at the protest site blared: "Has the West been won? Or has the fight just begun!"
In the western states, public lands are a big deal. Almost everyone uses them or depends on them. They are key to people's recreational hiking, fishing, hunting and skiing. And they are critical to people's livelihood, as they are used to cut timber, drill oil, mine coal and ranch cattle.
Vast swaths of the land in the West are predominately public. In Nevada, for example, 87% of the state is owned by the federal government, and the Bureau of Land Management oversees 245 million acres of public lands mostly west of the Mississippi River, not including the lands overseen by the National Forest Service and half a dozen other federal agencies.
In Nevada, ranchers depend on the federal lands for their livelihood. The government began allowing the use of the land in 1877 to promote the economic development of dry, difficult-to-cultivate desert areas. So it offered land for dirt cheap. Bundy says his family has owned the ranch since about the time the Desert Land Act passed.
A version of the law still exists today, allowing ranchers to graze their cattle on public lands for a nominal rate. The fee is cheaper than what the rancher would pay the state or a private land owner, but the tradeoff is that the rancher has to share the land with the public.
After the desert tortoise became a protected species in 1993, the Bureau of Land Management rebuked or phased out the permits of ranchers in the designated area in southern Nevada.
Bundy is the last remaining rancher, refusing to leave and refusing to pay more than $1 million worth of fines. Bundy lost all efforts at appeal and litigation. In an effort to enforce the law, the BLM attempted to round up Bundy's cattle and was met with a clan of armed defenders, leading to the current stalemate between the government and Bundy.
The Nevada Democrat had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Last week the state's senior senator blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
Oh jee, how is that racist? Ive wondered myself if blacks would have had a higher standard of living today had they still been slaves.Slaves are property and you take care of property.Wage labor you rent someone then throw them away when you are done.It is a question of economics and capitalism and living standards.Blacks have very poor living standards compared to white Americans and the gap is growing not getting smaller.
Republicans you were warned not to jump on the Bundy band wagon and now you will pay the price for supporting a law breaker
If the govt tried to take something from a black guy and several hundred other black people with guns rallied around him, the incident would be viewed very differently.
So the GOP cheerleaders are back-stepping. Bundy's comment are a surprise? Not at all.
This 'anti-government' hypocrite then has the nerve to parade around with the American flag. Much like the GOP hides their rhetoric behind a flag and Christianity. Just 'tools' to push their agenda.
Yes Mr. Bundy we know what you really stand for, however, there are more white people on welfare than black. It's more like 65% white 25% black and other at 10%.
Wow first the Republicans jumped on the tea party train, only to find that it had no brakes and driven by a bunch of nuts, now they are on the back of C. Bundy's horse and these are the people who want to be leaders.
The most ironic part of this is that HE is on a government subsidy - he got free grazing rights for his cattle, grazing that is valued at over a MILLION DOLLARS.
I am sure he doesn't see it that way, of course, because in his mind he isn't one of the 'takers'. In reality, he takes far more than most people, black or white (or any other color).
Sean Hannity quotes from article:
If a tribe of Indians tried to stop an oil pipeline from being built on their property, the Republicans would be the first to remove them by force
Slave to the rancher, or Slave to the government. I'll pick the rancher.
Vee @ 5:49pm Liberal??? Not one thing that you wrote could even be close to how a centrist would feel, never mind any liberal I've ever met.
@KyleName: CNN did post this story before, sorry you missed it. But CNN *is* typically more interested in stories about politics than stories about cattle ranchers. Until now there was little political mileage on the story.
((Jeremy)) gets the only star on this board.
Talk about the tail wagging the dog. This offensive and unfortunate comment will generate enough feigned outrage and minimize the real issue the BLM v Cattle Rancher has raised. The sheep will fall in line - the real patriots will not be distracted.
Sorry, righties. You guys owned this guy two weeks ago. You still own him today. Not going to be very easy putting the light of day between this guy's remarks and the philosophy of the GOP.
I guess according to CNN a man's opinion is far more vile and offensive than attacking his family and stealing and killing his cattle.
WACO TEXAS MASSACRE
The Feds are gathering and have brought in hired guns. We are more likely than not headed into a military confrontation – the first since WACO. Keep in mind that Obama’s head of the Justice Department, Eric Holder now Attorney General, called the shots on WACO back then. He got away with it before – why not again? There is a hope that if enough people show up the Feds will stand-down. The likelihood of the Feds ever backing down is highly unlikely, The Federal Government is severely disconnected from the people and views anyone who stands up to them as a criminal and domestic terrorist. This is merely a dress rehearsal for the next 5 years that we face – a rising confrontation between the people and the government.
Good for him for expressing himself, and I am disappointed that politicians' would categorize him like they did.
Bundy is a deadbeat. He is ripping off every man, woman and child in the United States that works hard, pay their fees and not blame their failure as a rancher on the government. The armed thugs that helped him must believe the same double standard as they obviously hold the same values as the deadbeat.
What I find appalling is the fact that just because fox covered it does not implicate them as part of his comments. The channel did not condone nit paying taxes – they were simply saying the govts. reaction was incredibly poor judgement – by bringing militia and snipers for grazing fees.
And even though his remarks are hate filled and stupid he still has the right to say what he believes – even if it's wrong.
Says person who is taking government subsidy by grazing on federal land.
The oops governor should keep his mouth shut. Anyone remember the name of his ranch? Probably hasn't done a thing about it.
"Every conservative I know does not support racism, period," he said.
About a man he frequently has had on his show.
Which must make Cliven a liberal (ouch) who hates the government. For not allowing (subsidizing) him to graze his cattle on government owned land. Maybe he should have learned to pick cotton.
Now that the race card is being pulled, the democrats will win this one right out of the salinksy play book, paint your opponent as racist.
What we are constantly reminded - Tea Partiers are racist-don't-make-me-pay-for-the-roads-I-use-but-please-give-me-every-hand-out-available-IDIOTS, and the Republican party is a joke so desperate to find voters that they willingly latch themselves onto these lunatics to get any votes they can.