Updated 9:29 p.m. ET 4/24/2014
(CNN) - What started out as a standoff over land rights may be turning into a controversy over race.
Racist comments from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy - who earlier this month appeared to win a highly publicized standoff against federal authorities over his two-decade long illegal grazing of cattle on public land - are giving Democrats a new weapon to attack some top Republicans who earlier came to Bundy's defense.
Follow @LACaldwellDC Follow @KilloughCNN Follow @psteinhausercnnFollow @politicalticker
And the controversial comments also call into question moves by Fox News and some other conservative media that highlighted the story and painted Bundy as a hero in his battle against federal authorities.
Bundy, 67, won his standoff against federal rangers after armed militiamen came to his side. Even with the incident over, Bundy continued to talk to a dwindling crowd of media from his ranch, about 100 miles northeast of Las Vegas.
The comments that sparked the latest controversy came this weekend when Bundy recalled to supporters about a time he drove by a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, according to a report from The New York Times.
"I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro," Bundy said, "and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids - and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch - they didn't have nothing to do. They didn't have nothing for their kids to do. They didn't have nothing for their young girls to do.
"And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?" Bundy continued. "They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I've often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn't get no more freedom. They got less freedom."
What Cliven Bundy's comments on race reveal
In a press conference Thursday, Bundy defended and repeated his comments but emphasized he was merely "wondering" whether African-Americans were better off as slaves.
"And that's a question I put before the world: Are they better, or were they better then? I'm not saying I thought they should be slaves, or I wasn't even saying they was (sic) better off; I'm wondering if they're better off," he said.
Bundy said he questions whether those living under government subsidies are living as slaves to the state, but denied he held racist views.
"I might not have a very big word base or vocabulary, I guess, but let me tell you something: When I say slavery, I mean slavery...Slavery is about when you take away choices from people, and where you have forced labor," he said. "You think that's what I'm about, America? If it is, you're sure wrong, because I don't believe in any type of that stuff."
And Bundy didn't back down in an interview Thursday night with CNN's Bill Weir. He questioned whether blacks are better off now when "they don't have nothing to do with their children, their family unit is ruined (and) I don't think they have the life that they should have."
"I don't think I'm wrong," he told CNN, insisting that he'd spoken "from my heart." "I think I'm right."
Asked whether he was any more or less a "welfare queen" as those who get entitlement checks - since his cattle have been feeding off the government, literally, by eating grass on public land - Bundy said, "I might be a welfare queen, but I'll tell you I'm producing something for America and using a resource that nobody else would use or could use."
He said, "I'm putting red meat on your table. Maybe I'm not doing enough, but I'm trying."
'Comments are completely beyond the pale'
Thursday morning, hours after The New York Times story went viral, the Nevada Democratic Party put out a statement saying "These comments are reprehensible, and every Republican politician in the state of Nevada who tried to latch on to Cliven Bundy's newfound celebrity with TEA Partiers and the militia movement should be ashamed of their actions."
"Every Republican elected official who risked inciting violence to gain political capital out of Cliven Bundy now owes the people of Nevada an apology for their irresponsible behavior of putting their own political future ahead of the safety of Nevadans," added the Nevada Democrats.
Some top national Republicans quickly condemned the remarks.
Sen. Rand Paul, who originally supported Bundy's case, issued a statement Thursday morning decrying Bundy's racial comments.
"His remarks on race are offensive and I wholeheartedly disagree with him," said the Kentucky Republican, who's seriously considering a 2016 presidential run.
GOP Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada, who earlier called his supporters "patriots", also "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy's appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way," according to his spokesperson, Chandler Smith.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who had not previously weighed in on the land dispute, said in a statement that "Bundy's comments are completely beyond the pale. Both highly offensive and 100% wrong on race."
Democrats had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – Nevada's senior senator - last week blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
One man, former Arizona sheriff Richard Mack told a reporter the militia were considering putting "all the women" on the front lines.
"If they're going to start shooting, it's going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers," he said.
Questions about media coverage
Some conservative-leaning pundits painted Bundy as an anti-goverment hero. Fox News' Sean Hannity was criticized by liberal media outlets for frequently hosting Bundy on his television program and appearing to defend the rancher.
Hannity said Thursday on his radio show that Bundy's "comments are beyond repugnant to me."
"They are beyond despicable to me. They are beyond ignorant to me," he said, adding that his interest in Bundy's case was entirely about government overreach.
He also chided what he called the liberal media, arguing that they ignore racist comments by Democrats and only focus on Republicans.
"Every conservative I know does not support racism, period," he said.
Another Fox News host, Greta Van Susteren, wrote on her blog Thursday morning that she condemns Bundy's comments.
Others had previously warned fellow conservatives not to get too fired up about the Nevada dispute. Conservative host Glenn Beck said on his show that "10 or 15 percent" of the people who were defending Bundy online were saying things "that are truly frightening."
"They don't care what the facts are," he said. "They just want a fight."
Tucker Carlson, founder of the conservative news outlet the Daily Caller, said on Fox that he sympathizes with the Bundys, but "it's important to point out that this land does not belong to them and that's not a minor distinction, it's the essence of private property."
For his part, Sen. Paul had also cautioned both sides, including Reid, to calm their rhetoric.
"Let's try to have a peaceful resolution to this," he said last week on Fox News.
While Republicans are now trying to distance themselves from Bundy, that's not stopping Democrats from going after them for supporting Bundy in the first place. And the Democratic National Committee says the incident is "more evidence of the shallowness of the GOP's outreach efforts."
"Remember Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson? His racist comments last December were in the same vein as Bundy's. Yet GOP leaders from Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Lindsey Graham, and others rushed to defend (Robertson's) comments against a liberal assault. Republicans even invited the Duck Dynasty stars as their guests to the State of the Union!," wrote DNC Communications Director Mo Elleithee.
"And therein lies the GOP's problem. If you ever want to be taken seriously for your outreach efforts, you might want to start by not defending racists," Elleithee added.
Battle over land rights
The Bundy standoff is emblematic of the larger anti-government sentiment around the country that has been amplified with the creation of the tea party movement in 2009. But the latest move in a two-decade-long tug of war between Bundy and the federal government is bringing to light the delicate balance that has lasted between citizens in the West and the federal government over the use of federally owned land for generations.
What made Nevada rancher fight the feds?
One protester from neighboring Utah, Stephen L. Dean, 45, called the Bureau of Land Management's actions "tyranny in government." And a banner at the protest site blared: "Has the West been won? Or has the fight just begun!"
In the western states, public lands are a big deal. Almost everyone uses them or depends on them. They are key to people's recreational hiking, fishing, hunting and skiing. And they are critical to people's livelihood, as they are used to cut timber, drill oil, mine coal and ranch cattle.
Vast swaths of the land in the West are predominately public. In Nevada, for example, 87% of the state is owned by the federal government, and the Bureau of Land Management oversees 245 million acres of public lands mostly west of the Mississippi River, not including the lands overseen by the National Forest Service and half a dozen other federal agencies.
In Nevada, ranchers depend on the federal lands for their livelihood. The government began allowing the use of the land in 1877 to promote the economic development of dry, difficult-to-cultivate desert areas. So it offered land for dirt cheap. Bundy says his family has owned the ranch since about the time the Desert Land Act passed.
A version of the law still exists today, allowing ranchers to graze their cattle on public lands for a nominal rate. The fee is cheaper than what the rancher would pay the state or a private land owner, but the tradeoff is that the rancher has to share the land with the public.
After the desert tortoise became a protected species in 1993, the Bureau of Land Management rebuked or phased out the permits of ranchers in the designated area in southern Nevada.
Bundy is the last remaining rancher, refusing to leave and refusing to pay more than $1 million worth of fines. Bundy lost all efforts at appeal and litigation. In an effort to enforce the law, the BLM attempted to round up Bundy's cattle and was met with a clan of armed defenders, leading to the current stalemate between the government and Bundy.
The Nevada Democrat had already been on the attack against Bundy before his racial comments. Last week the state's senior senator blasted Bundy's supporters as "domestic terrorists," saying they were arming themselves with automatic weapons and positioning "snipers in strategic locations."
[Hannity] also chided what he called the liberal media, arguing that they ignore racist comments by Democrats and only focus on Republicans.
"Every conservative I know does not support racism, period," he said.
All I can say to that rather awkwardly phrased proclamation is, "Then, Mr. Hannity, you clearly don't know very many conservatives."
Not a peep from Fox since this news broke.
CNN says that Bundy and the armed militia "won the standoff". I guess CNN doesn't realize that Bundy's cattle have his brand and when he takes his cattle to market to sell, there will be a brand inspector. And when the cattle is identified as Bundy's, any money paid for the cattle will go to the Federal Government who has a lean on this cattle. So that cattle is Bundy's until it is time sell them.
Typical shoddy reporting by CNN who figures that its readers/viewers are too stupid to notice. Or, perhaps, their reporters are too stupid to follow a story to its natural conclusion.
Much of what he said is true!
This is worth repeating. "Rick perry denounced it but wasnt he the one who had a racist sign by his hunting camp"?
I wonder. Is it possible that FOX network has been infiltrated by leftists who are attempting to make FOX look stupid for backing such idiots?
No. The left isn't that bright. It's just that FOX isn't either.
The guy breaks the law, treats public land as his own, raises a militia to threaten government workers, and many GOPers cheer him as a hero. The GOP has become not just an extreme party but a frightening one.
Go figure this has been ongoing for the longest time. The mainstream media finally reports on it once the issue of race occurs. How sad.
Oh yeah they're better off. I see many of them working and driving very nice cars. I think this guy needs to go the "big city" and leave Walton's Mountain once in a while.
If what he said was such a crime, why doesn't someone call the cops on him?
Why is everyone treating him like a criminal if it was not a crime for him to say what he said?
Why do we claim to have free speech in this country when it's apparent we do not?
Who is living off the public teat? Clive is. Hell he should graze his cattle wherever he wants and not have to pay for it. Koch brothers front lawns, Hannity's cabbage patch, Arlington National Cemetery. And to keep things neat ,have those enslaved non slaves clean up after the cows.
Things are very very weird down there folks.
Barack Obama was made to apologize to the Guatemalans that were tested on with STDS in 1946....these devils probly offered them a better mud hut in exchange for an incurable disese but lied about it so they would accept. People are stupid and washington only grows worse by the day.
Is this really worthy of news. We know folks "right of the aisle" harbor these beliefs.
The guy obviously has a screw loose. He makes money grazing cattle on our public lands, stirs up a bunch of pretend patriots and for his final act, shoots himself in the foot with weird slavery comments. Time for Mr Bundy to retire before he suffers from another self inflicted wound.
I'm a conservative republican, and I think Cliven Bundy has revealed himself to be an ignorant & insensitive racist. Government overreach in maintaining a grasp on vast tracts of land in Western states is a legitimate issue, but Bundy's racist remarks have the same effect as a screaming, irrational person that crashes a civilized debate: his irrationality diverts all attention, and shuts down any legitimate discussion. The entire country should condemn Bundy's views on race, and refuse to speak with him from now on, as he has disqualified himself from being a spokesman for any movement.
I think this Bundy guy is a dead beat and needs to pay his bills. Talk about a guy who wants to freeload off the government, we'll that would be Bundy.
GOP...you bought this creep and you own him. Tough.
Why can't people in America just be free to express themselves without everyone making a big deal out of it?
This conservative thought Bundy was a crazy coot before the racist comments.
A man speaks truth and called a racist, since when is wanting other races to be successful racist?
Considering 97% of blacks are not on welfare, why don't you ask them if they are better off. How about the 1% of whites on welfare should they be enslaved too?
Repub politicians are like, "You fool, you're only supposed to THINK those things!"
What kills me is that NO ONE from any political party or view will take a stance that there ARE people out there that MILK THE SYSTEM for all they can and will never work. And these people are of ALL races and walks of life.
This guy was a hero to the Tea party
until they found out he was actually
I have NEVER seen so many GOP members
back peddling their bycycles , this fast.
This one is going to hurt.....LOL !!!!
At last, some Americans have found a use for all their firearms – playing soldier to "protect" some range land. Good! A little later, I expect to see others using their guns to get water in the South West. Now that this has started, the possibilities are almost endless. But don't worry if you too need a bunch of guns to get what you can't otherwise have, there are LOTS of guns to go around. Hell, I expect there are enough to have a very inclusive civil war where you can all shoot each other.