April 28th, 2014
05:43 PM ET
7 months ago

Kerry under fire for reported ‘apartheid’ remarks about Israel

Updated 9:00am ET 4/29/2014

(CNN) – Secretary of State John Kerry drew strong rebukes for reportedly saying that Israel risks becoming "an apartheid state" if a Mideast peace deal isn’t reached soon.

The alleged comments were reported on Sunday by the Daily Beast, which said it obtained a recording of Kerry speaking to global leaders at a closed-door meeting where the stalled peace process was discussed.

Kerry issued a statement after the uproar underscoring his long-held support for Israel and commitment to finding a two-state solution in the conflict.

“… I have been around long enough to also know the power of words to create a misimpression, even when unintentional, and if I could rewind the tape, I would have chosen a different word to describe my firm belief that the only way in the long term to have a Jewish state and two nations and two peoples living side by side in peace and security is through a two state solution,” he said.

Earlier Monday, the State Department would not confirm or deny Kerry’s comments.

In his statement, Kerry notes that Israeli leaders in the past have used the term “apartheid” in talking about the dangers of a unity state between the Israelis and Palestinians. He adds, however, “it is a word best left out of the debate here at home.”

The story took another turn when the organizers of the event where Kerry spoke wrote a letter to Kerry apologizing for the apparent breach of protocol by Josh Rogin, a reporter with the Daily Beast.

“He was not invited,” wrote Joseph Nye, Chairman of the Trilateral Commission. “Although how Mr. Rogin slipped past both Commission staff and Diplomatic Security is unclear to me, we have confirmed that he indeed was present and apparently recorded the session.”

Nevertheless, the report angered American-Jewish officials and some in Congress.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee called it "deeply troubling."

"Any suggestion that Israel is, or is at risk of becoming, an apartheid state is offensive and inappropriate," the group said in a statement. "The Jewish state is a shining light for freedom and opportunity in a region plagued by terror, hate and oppression."

The group underscored that it agreed with President Barack Obama, who said in 2008 the use of the term "apartheid" to describe the ongoing conflict between the Israeli and the Palestinian governments is "emotionally loaded” and “historically inaccurate."

Apartheid was the reviled system of racial segregation practiced by the white-minority government in South Africa for decades before the country transitioned to a multi-party democracy that was first led by Nelson Mandela.

Kerry’s reported reference to “an apartheid state” however, isn’t the first time a top official used the term when referring to the Israeli-Palestinian situation.

"As long as in this territory, west of the Jordan River, there is only one political entity called Israel. It is going to be either non-Jewish or non-Democratic. If this block of millions of Palestinians cannot vote that will be an apartheid state,” former Prime Minister Ehud Barak said in 2010 when he was defense minister.

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, issued a statement calling reports that Kerry used such language "startling and deeply disappointing."

"We appreciate Mr. Kerry's deep concern for Israel and his desires to ensure that it have a future of peace and security. Even if he used the repugnant language of Israel's adversaries and accusers to express concern for Israel's future, it was undiplomatic, unwise and unfair,” Foxman said. “Such references are not seen as expressions of friendship and support.”

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Republican from Virginia and Congress’ highest-ranking Jewish member, said Obama should call on Kerry to apologize to Israel.

"Reports that Secretary Kerry has suggested Israel is becoming an apartheid state are extremely disappointing. The use of the word apartheid has routinely been dismissed as both offensive and inaccurate, and Secretary Kerry’s use of it makes peace even harder to achieve," he said in a statement.

Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican and potential presidential candidate, took things a step further by calling on Kerry to resign.

“There is no place for this word in the context of the state of Israel,” he said.

Israeli PM Netanyahu: No peace talks if Abbas is backed by Hamas

The U.S.-sponsored negotiations hit a road block last week after the Palestinians announced they would combine rival movements Fatah and Hamas to form a unity government.

Related: Russia, Syria, Middle East: Is the U.S. losing its ability to sway allies?

Israel's Security Cabinet subsequently announced the country won't hold talks with a Palestinian government backed by the militant Hamas movement.

CNN's Laura Koran contributed to this report.


Filed under: AIPAC • Eric Cantor • Israel • John Kerry • Palestine • Ted Cruz
soundoff (259 Responses)
  1. JKHouston

    Tour through Israel. It won't take more than an hour to realize what Kerry is saying. Reading President Carter's book "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid" may confirm what Kerry is saying.

    April 29, 2014 10:54 am at 10:54 am |
  2. Fair is Fair

    Hardly a diplomatic statement from America's top diplomat.

    April 29, 2014 11:14 am at 11:14 am |
  3. HJA

    I have been saying that for years. Israel is not interested in peace. If they wanted peace they know they would have to give back the land they seized during the war.

    April 29, 2014 11:20 am at 11:20 am |
  4. loyalright

    The Hatred from the Obama Administration is incredible. When will it stop? Israel wants to live in peace. What part of that does Obama and Kerry not understand? Kerry should resign in disgrace. He has accomplished nothing just like his predecessor.

    April 29, 2014 11:21 am at 11:21 am |
  5. DRJJJ

    Fatah and Hamas as a unity government-there's a crowd we can all trust to do the right thing huh?

    April 29, 2014 11:27 am at 11:27 am |
  6. John

    It's still an emotionally loaded and historically inaccurate term. Israel and Apartheid South Africa are different in SO MANY ways. Just the fact that there are Israeli Arabs and Arab MKs in Israel alone makes it NOT Apartheid.

    April 29, 2014 11:29 am at 11:29 am |
  7. neastsider

    Israel becoming an apartheid state, It's been like that for years. Hagee the Israeli buttkisser must have his tighty whities in a big bunch and Cruz must be in a real tizzy now calling for Kerry to resign for saying what is fact. Israel is and always will be an arpatheid state as long as it's allowed to exist

    April 29, 2014 11:30 am at 11:30 am |
  8. Joe M.

    I think Kerry poisoned his own well. Israelis had a little respect for Kerry before he made this remark, now they have virtually none, I'm sure.

    April 29, 2014 11:32 am at 11:32 am |
  9. Al-NY,NY

    Joe M.

    I think Kerry poisoned his own well. Israelis had a little respect for Kerry before he made this remark, now they have virtually none, I'm sure.
    ---–

    yeah...even if they did respect him, they do whatever they want with no regard for it's consequences because they have the american political system by the you know what

    April 29, 2014 11:38 am at 11:38 am |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11