(CNN) - The attorney for embattled former IRS official Lois Lerner said Sunday that Republicans are denigrating an innocent woman for purely political purposes.
In an exclusive interview with CNN's Candy Crowley, attorney William Taylor said it's "convenient" for the GOP to suggest that Lerner's computer crash, which destroyed documents sought by a House Committee, means something "nefarious" was going on.
Follow @politicaltickerFollow @danadavidsenCNN
"This is election-year politics," Taylor said on "State of the Union" in his first television appearance on the controversy.
"It's convenient to have a demon that they can create and point to."
An investigation that was initially focused on whether the IRS unfairly targeted certain political groups became more convoluted last week when the agency announced the destruction of Lerner's e-mails - lost in an apparent hard drive crash.
Taylor said Lerner walked into her office one day and her computer screen was blue. Her hard drive had crashed.
"The truth is this was one of those things that happened," he said. "At the time she did everything she could to retrieve it. She reported it right away. And that's all there is to it."
Lerner, who ran the division that carried out the IRS targeting, resigned last year after the Treasury Department's inspector general found that employees working under her used "inappropriate" criteria to scrutinize certain groups, particularly those with conservative political names.
Koskinen: IRS troubles 'suspicious,' but no crime uncovered
"People who want to give money to elections and do so in a tax-free way have to submit themselves to the scrutiny of the IRS to be sure they are complying with the rules that limit political activity," Taylor said.
"If the IRS is not looking at political activity in the C4 applications, which is what this is, they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing. So it's like saying ‘They're examining us for political activity’ when that's the exact criteria they're submitting for their applications."
Since her resignation, Lerner has refused to testify at hearings, invoking her constitutional right not to do so – a move that stirred suspicion that she had something to hide.
Koskinen's donations raised questions as House GOP calls for more documents
Taylor said, however, the reason he advised his client to invoke her Fifth Amendment right was because “there was no pretense that this would be a fair process” in the investigation led by House Oversight chairman Republican Rep. Darrell Issa of California.
Issa said Sunday, also in an exclusive interview to CNN, that Taylor "has said things that are not correct, or disingenuous or outright lied a number of times, it's been shown by e-mails."
"(An) attorney trying to get his client off the hook after flubbing and taking the fifth certainly will say and do a lot of things. But they're not held accountable," Issa said on "State of the Union."
Taylor wouldn’t respond specifically to Issa’s claim that he had lied, but again suggested Republicans are using his client has a political tool to gin up conservative enthusiasm ahead of the midterm elections.
Asked by Crowley if Lerner violated federal law requiring the agency to back up its communications, Taylor said his client “did exactly as she was required to do."
Another branch in the investigation, further inflaming Republican sentiment against Lerner, was the disclosure last week by Issa of e-mail exchanges showing that Lerner asked, while still on the job in 2012, whether the tax agency should investigate an issue involving Republican Sen. Charles Grassley.
E-mails: Ex-IRS official Lois Lerner queried Sen. Chuck Grassley invitation
The e-mails centered on an invitation from an unnamed group to Grassley to attend a seminar. What prompted Lerner's interest in December 2012 was whether travel expenses for Grassley's wife were included and whether that would violate income tax rules. However, it was not clear from the e-mails whether Lerner, who reached out to a co-worker, was inquiring about a potential audit of Grassley or whether she thought the IRS should look at the group. Her lawyer said she acted appropriately.
Taylor maintained his client’s innocence on all fronts, insisting that from the beginning “(Republicans’) only purpose to have her there is to vilify her.”
Lerner has received death threats against herself and her family. Taylor said she is not receiving protection.
“She has to go on living her life,” he said. “She's been made to be a villain in a way that's very, very unfair.”
Watch State of the Union with Candy Crowley Sundays at 9am ET. For the latest from State of the Union click here.
If they had sufficient proof to put her on trial, they would have.
Tell me who, wherever in the world likes the IRS or its equivalent.... it is a constant battle between every taxpayer and the IRS one wanting to " legally pay less tax" and the other to catch people who are cheating,
Mr ISSA seems to overlook this reality of life.
The problem here was not "targeting" but a requirement of the tax law that actually reduced the high standards in the law from 100% exclusion of political activity to more than 51 % non political activity, in internal rules guidance.
The problem here is that guidance made it essential to review all 501 (c) 4's to determine if they qualified!! More to the point, The citizens United SCOTUS decision led to a flood of 501 (c) 4 applications as it turned out from mostly, relatively speaking Republican leaning organisations.
The easiest way to stop this farce is to look from Day1 after citizens United to now how many either republican leaning or democrat leaning have been approved, rejected and still pending under investigation. my guess is probably 95% approved. That stops this useless daily stage show farce and circus
We need to find a way to tax Hypocrisy... Liberals and progressives would be broke.