June 2nd, 2009
12:12 PM ET
12 years ago

Nancy Reagan to appear at WH, lunch with Michelle Obama

[cnn-photo-caption image= http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/06/02/art.nancyac0602.gi.jpg caption="Former first lady Nancy Reagan will be attending an event at the White House on Tuesday afternoon."]
WASHINGTON (CNN) – Former first lady Nancy Reagan will personally attend a White House ceremony Tuesday afternoon when President Obama signs legislation authorizing the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission, CNN has learned.

Mrs. Reagan will also attend the unveiling of a new statute of President Reagan Wednesday morning at 10 a.m. in the Capitol Rotunda. After the unveiling, the former first lady will share a private White House lunch with Michelle Obama.

Filed under: Michelle Obama • Nancy Reagan • President Obama
soundoff (223 Responses)
  1. indiana voter


    You are the worst of human beings. How sad that you wish anyone to die, and to die with a disease. As for your attempt to discredit Reagan, using the New York Times is not a good start as they are one of the biggest liberal political hack rags in the country. So, of course it is going to say something negative about a Republican. You do yourself a disservice by posting on this site and showing your hate and ignorance on these matters. There should be less people in the world like you.

    June 2, 2009 12:46 pm at 12:46 pm |
  2. Brandon V in DFW

    I am a Democrat, I guess you can say a liberal. But I think that Reagan was great. I served in the military and appreciate all he did to grow the military and protect our country.

    I like a lot of people am not a straight party person, and though I may not agree with everything Reagan did or believed he was a very good president.

    And I love Nancy, she is a sweet lady.

    June 2, 2009 12:47 pm at 12:47 pm |
  3. republican scum scum

    the only good republican is one who is 6 feet under the ground, or better yet being cremated so they dont waste precious earth space

    June 2, 2009 12:48 pm at 12:48 pm |
  4. Disbelief

    @ Jimmy the Greek
    Presidential Rankings:
    Ronald Reagan: 10 Bill Clinton: 15
    Barack Hussein Obama: WORST EVER

    eeeeeeehhhhhhhh .... WRONG

    We have saved that honor for the Shrub of Texas "Dubya" also known as George Bush

    June 2, 2009 12:48 pm at 12:48 pm |
  5. Jake

    do you think they will be dining off of the china Nancy purchased for $200,000 while in the White House?

    and the same Republican supporters take issue with a "date night?"


    June 2, 2009 12:51 pm at 12:51 pm |
  6. Michael

    One comment earlier said Mrs. Reagan is having lunch with the ugliest woman ever!, from teleprompter usa. Look here "Teleprompter", degrading Mrs. Obama is not the thing to do. You can talk about her Husband, but her!! NO!. you are probably as ugly as they come "Teleprompter USA" and just jealous of a beautiful, Smart, individual. Shame on you. Mrs. Reagan thank you for the years with President Regan. American President.

    June 2, 2009 12:51 pm at 12:51 pm |
  7. donttreadonme

    The continuous use of the teleprompter during press conferences gives off the impression that Obama cannot think for himself or is too scared of making a mistake. But it is true that he is fed talking points to respond to questions made during his press conferences.
    Not making this up.

    June 2, 2009 12:52 pm at 12:52 pm |
  8. Carlos

    Nancy you just need to give her some oats for lunch and then take that horseface out for a afternoon ride.

    June 2, 2009 12:52 pm at 12:52 pm |
  9. Becky in Indiana

    Wow-lot's of hate here... I think it is wonderful that two first ladies from different parties are adult enough to meet, have lunch, and discuss life in spite of their differences. Let's celebrate diversity.

    June 2, 2009 12:52 pm at 12:52 pm |
  10. southerncousin

    Fox news is reporting about Charlies Rangel's latest stupid remark, CNN is giving the libs something to spew hate against a woman whose husband was president almost 20 years ago. Tell me again libs which new outlet is relavant?

    June 2, 2009 12:53 pm at 12:53 pm |
  11. max

    Reagan gave America back its pride. When he took office our economy was decimated. Military morale was at a low point. Russia was a very real cold-war threat.

    You may not agree with his policies but he made decisions, explained himself to the american people and, overall, the people responded.

    About the silliness with the teleprompter... How does it hurt anything? He delivers the message that his administration put together.

    I dont make the broad assumption that the voting public is composed of fools who are simply "tricked" into believing in a policy based on a flashy presentation and a few sound bites.

    If the use of a teleprompter makes such a tremendous difference in how his policy is perceived then maybe its use should be expanded. Lets give teachers, professors, salespeople, managers and everyone that deals with the public a teleprompter!

    June 2, 2009 12:53 pm at 12:53 pm |
  12. S, Miami, FL

    donttreadonme June 2nd, 2009 12:01 pm ET

    Regan laid the foundation for the booming economies of the 80's and 90's. You libs really need a history lesson.

    Clinton opened up trade with communist China.

    Alex P Keaton for Prez!
    Actually it was Richard Nixon that opened up trade with communist China. Also, Alex P. Keaton (Michael J. Fox), who currently lives with Parkinson's Disease, supports stem cell research (along with Nancy Reagan) – a cause supported by mostly "libs".

    June 2, 2009 12:55 pm at 12:55 pm |
  13. donttreadonme

    republican scum scum June 2nd, 2009 12:48 pm ET
    the only good republican is one who is 6 feet under the ground, or better yet being cremated so they dont waste precious earth space
    Please put down the internet the grown ups are trying to talk now.

    June 2, 2009 12:55 pm at 12:55 pm |
  14. Robin

    @Jake June 2nd, 2009 12:51 pm ET
    do you think they will be dining off of the china Nancy purchased for $200,000 while in the White House...


    Michelle Obama will get a chance to buy her own china. And rightfully so.

    June 2, 2009 12:55 pm at 12:55 pm |
  15. James

    Enough of these statues. Do some real works, please!

    June 2, 2009 12:57 pm at 12:57 pm |
  16. Angie in Pa

    How petty are some of you Bashing the First Ladies and you CARLOS Are a Disgrace to America!

    June 2, 2009 12:57 pm at 12:57 pm |
  17. A.J.

    Oh, please...

    This is about Nance Reagan simply coming to the White House for a luncheon.

    You would think from the commits that we should call out the troops, lower the flag, and say 3 Hail Marys!!! Give it up...get a life ...and move on.

    I certainly was not a fan, but, enough. Let the two First Ladies have a wonderful lunch together. And, I hope she will enjoy the ceremony at the Capital. I can thank President Reagan for helping to get the "Wall" down, and that's good enough for me to have his statue in the Capital!

    June 2, 2009 12:58 pm at 12:58 pm |
  18. indiana voter

    Reagan won 49 out of 50 states in his re-election as President. I would say that the American people approved of Reagan's policies. The problem now, is you have people on this board who are probably too young to remember Reagan and are reading liberal blogs and textbooks to get their information. The fact remains though, that he was a very popular President with both parties and it just drives liberals crazy. Don't believe me? Read the posts on this site.

    June 2, 2009 12:59 pm at 12:59 pm |
  19. wagon

    Oh the Reagan haters. It's funny to watch you working on your heart attacks while thinking about The Gipper. BTW – Reagan lowered the top marginal tax rates to 28% from 70%. The top rates are 25% higher (35% vs. 28%) than they were under Reagan. The economic record for Reagan is – inflation down, unemployment down, taxes down, GDP up, deficits up. Those are the facts. While the last is disappointing, Reagan's deficits will be nothing compared to Obama's.

    June 2, 2009 01:00 pm at 1:00 pm |
  20. katiec

    What is going on today, CNN?
    You are either allowing no comments or cutting it off after one comment.
    Although think her husband was a horrible president, Nancy
    Reagan deserves respect.

    June 2, 2009 01:02 pm at 1:02 pm |
  21. Dave, the truth teller

    Ha Ha, Libnuts are sooo sunny and sooo predictable. I would leave another Lib-bating remark so I can laugh at the replies, but I actually have a legal, paying, job. Don't forget to cash those welfare checks, Libs.

    June 2, 2009 01:02 pm at 1:02 pm |
  22. Fair is Fair

    All I can say is... WOW.

    If the vile comments from BOTH the left and the right on this topic is any reflection of the American citizenry whatsoever, I really am saddened for my country.

    Party politics, as Thomas Jefferson mentioned, brings out the very worst of humanity.

    June 2, 2009 01:03 pm at 1:03 pm |
  23. Doug, New Jersey

    Its funny how the people who only spend their own money love Reagan, and the ungrateful lib takers who spend the money of the people they hate spew lie ridden hatrid toward the best president of the last 100 years.

    You know, if lib would spend half the energy they do on hating on those who have more wealth than they do or have more morals and values than they do and use that energy on getting skills or working hard, they could become one of the evil self efficiant Americans who pay for the hateful lib to servive and spew their lack of class, integrity, decency, and values on America.

    Lib truly thinks that taking is compassionate, and that hating on everyone is tolerance. Seems charecter truly is the biggest factor in which ideology we support. No wonder so many libs are atheists, would you want to answer before god after living a lib life?

    June 2, 2009 01:04 pm at 1:04 pm |
  24. B Davis

    southercousin: The Nancy Reagan news is more RELEVANT than Rangel's news on Fox.
    Learn how to spell before asking questions.

    June 2, 2009 01:04 pm at 1:04 pm |
  25. donttreadonme

    S, Miami, FL June 2nd, 2009 12:55 pm ET

    Please dont get me started on the 'EMBRYONIC" stem cell debate. The leading reasearchers have stated that EMBRYONIC stem cells are not helpfull in Parkinson's reasearch and the adult stem cells are where the break throughs are taking place.

    The "Embryonic" stem cell debate is all political.

    June 2, 2009 01:05 pm at 1:05 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9