July 8th, 2009
02:05 PM ET
13 years ago

Emanuel faces liberal pressure over 'trigger' comments

[cnn-photo-caption image= http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/01/20/art.rahm0120.gi.jpg caption="White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel came under fire from MoveOn Tuesday."]WASHINGTON (CNN) - The president's health care reform package - which has faced resistance from conservatives who oppose a public insurance option - came under attack from liberals yesterday, with most of the fire focused on White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

Emanuel's apparent suggestion in a Wall Street Journal article published Tuesday that the White House would be willing to consider a "trigger" clause on a public option - to delay full implementation of the plan if insurance companies met certain conditions on coverage and cost - drew outrage from liberal members of Congress and MoveOn.org, which has poured millions of dollars into a campaign supporting the president's health care proposal.

Progressive Caucus co-chair Rep. Raúl Grijalva of Arizona immediately sent a letter to President Obama denouncing the idea. And MoveOn - which has launched ad campaigns in recent weeks pressuring equivocal senators to support the president's plan, and a public option - quickly turned its criticism on the White House.

"Can you call the White House switchboard and tell them you're disappointed in Chief of Staff Emanuel's comments supporting the 'trigger'?" MoveOn asked in a message sent to supporters Tuesday. The e-mail included the number for the White House switchboard. "Tell them voters want a strong public health insurance option-not half-measures like the 'trigger.'"

Within hours, the president issued a statement from Moscow that did not mention the controversy, but stressed his support for a public option. The statement did not specifically mention - or rule out - the use of a "trigger."

"I am pleased by the progress we're making on health care reform and still believe, as I've said before, that one of the best ways to bring down costs, provide more choices, and assure quality is a public option that will force the insurance companies to compete and keep them honest," he said. "I look forward to a final product that achieves these very important goals."

Yesterday afternoon, Emanuel himself headed to Capitol Hill, where he heard complaints from liberal lawmakers. The idea of a trigger option is popular with conservative Democrats - but according to Roll Call, legislators the chief of staff met with yesterday told him its inclusion in a final health care package would cost the proposal their support, sinking the measure.

House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman said Emanuel had said what members were hoping to hear. "He doesn't stand by the trigger," Waxman told Roll Call. "He said the president and his administration and he are for a public plan as one of the options."

Filed under: Health care • President Obama • Rahm Emanuel
soundoff (280 Responses)
  1. honestly

    As well he should be.
    Obama is out of the country, so Rahm steps in – don't know WHAT he actually steps in, but I can guess.

    Let me be blunt. Never cared for Obama's pick for Chief of Staff, especially after I saw him thumbing his nose at someone during the Inauguration. Many of us were hoping for more of a class act in the White House.

    July 8, 2009 12:21 pm at 12:21 pm |
  2. Jhak Schiddt

    The real answer is to de-regulate health care, encourage a larger number of providers to enter the market place, and draw the benefits of a TRUE free market.

    July 8, 2009 12:23 pm at 12:23 pm |
  3. aaron

    Chicago gangsters acting like Chicago gangsters. Where's the surprise?
    Corporate Prostitutes selling this country down river to the Global shareholders .
    Mussolini himself didn't like the term Fascinista, he preferred Corporate Socialism. Regardless of which way it goes, know they'll be lining their pockets at the top. Poverty pimp should go join the Likud Party, they already have a full blown Police State, Corporate Dictatorship. Go ruin somebody else's country. Don't confuse "Change" with " Choice".

    July 8, 2009 12:23 pm at 12:23 pm |
  4. Tom from Roch., NY

    How about discussing the merits of all options, instead of outright dismissing any option. Then you can make an informed decision that MOST people can live with. Because, let's face it, this bill will not please everyone no matter what. The main thing is to make significant progress in any way shape or form possible.

    July 8, 2009 12:24 pm at 12:24 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12