Sanford impeachment panel to examine new ethics charges
(CNN) - A panel of South Carolina lawmakers who gathered Tuesday to formally consider impeaching Gov. Mark Sanford voted to broaden the scope of their inquiry to include 37 new ethics charges against the Republican.
Those civil charges were revealed Monday by the South Carolina Ethics Commission, which had conducted a three-month investigation into Sanford's use of state finances. The governor and his legal team now face a hearing before the Ethics Commission to determine if Sanford broke any state laws by charging the state for first- and business-class flights, using state-owned aircraft for political travel and tapping into campaign funds for personal use.
The lawmakers, members of a special subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee that met for the first time Tuesday, decided to include the ethics charges in their review and scheduled four more meetings of the subcommittee for December.
The group will review the Ethics Commission report over Thanksgiving and decide if the charges should be included in the impeachment resolution, which accuses Sanford of "serious misconduct" for leaving the state in June to visit his Argentine mistress without leaving in place a chain of command.
The seven lawmakers - four Republicans and three Democrats - listened to sworn affadavits from key players in the scandal and entered into the record news reports from June highlighting Sanford's absence from the state.
Rep. Greg Delleney, one of the Republicans who drafted the impeachment measure, appeared to warn Sanford against fighting an impeachment effort, should the subcommittee decide to move forward.
"Impeachment is a political process, it's not a legal process," Delleney said at the meeting, which was attended by Sanford's attorneys. "There is no appeal from an impeachment process. Impeachment is final. Impeachment is solely the constitutional power, duty and responsibility of the South Carolina House of Representatives."
Delleney said governors can be impeached regardless of whether a crime was committed.
Ross Garber, one of Sanford's attorneys, called the impeachment hearing "an extraordinary and extremely rare process. In a statement released after the meeting, Garber said that the governor's "temporary absence from the state in June" does not merit his removal from office.
"As was pointed out in the hearing this afternoon, the state Constitution ensures that the chain of command in state government is not threatened because the Lt. Governor is automatically transferred command in the event of an emergency during the governor's temporary absence," Garber said.
From CNN Politics
- Impeachment managers dissect abuse of power charge in making case against Trump January 24, 2020 04:13 am
- Senate GOP uses Trump's executive privilege threat as rallying cry against subpoenas January 24, 2020 02:31 am
- Takeaways from Day 3 of Trump's impeachment trial January 24, 2020 05:00 am
- Analysis: Adam Schiff piles pressure on Republicans under fire January 24, 2020 05:32 am
- Letter shows White House wouldn't provide documents to agency investigating Ukraine aid January 24, 2020 05:38 am
- Trump now says he's open to entitlement cuts, including Medicare January 23, 2020 10:34 pm
Please ignore the fact that this guy had a sole mate in Argentina that his matrimonial problems! however! if he has abused his office go for him! if not leave the guy alone
Other republican governors quit willy nilly, and this dude won't quit even when it's obvious that no one wants him there. He's willing to drag his state and his family through all the ugly details because he is too selfish.
Let him stay and run for President in 2012 with Sarah Palin. Sanford was after all one of the Republican's top contenders to run for President.
Hey dummy, you are supposed to be religious. You should know what happened to the Pharaoh when he became hard-head and tried desperately to keep his grip on power. The Pharaoh eventually lost it all because he wouldn't let it go.
LEAVE SANFORD WHILE YOU STILL GOT SOMETHING TO HOLD!
Dude, he's so out of luck!!!!!!!!!!!!
do you know the meaning of ethics?? what ethics? He took people's money, and flew to south America, to see his girl while his wife is still alive. Is this ethics, is this morality, are these values????just impeach this idiot....catch also other idiots like this idiot....ok...no more questions...if you have any kind of ethics, just impeach this idiot....let go...this idiot..ok
Get him out anyway you can....he's a complete moron.
There are many good reasons to impeach Mark Sanford and there are no reasons not to do so. The good reasons are as follows:
* Sanford was derilect in his duties as governor for three or four days.
* Sanford misused state property and tax payer funds to perpetrate an illicit affair with a woman who is not his wife. The man is married.
* Sanford abused his position and the public trust for personal gain.
* Sanford initially lied to the public about his wherabouts at a press conference.
These are some of the good reasons for his impeachment. There are many others too numerous to enumerate. This man is a disgrace and an embarrasment and must go.
is he still around.nothing worthwile to report cnn.
Amazing that this IDIOT is still in the news.........
Only in america would a politician be prosecuted/persecuted for having an affair....puritanical, idealistic, sad society...
signed, an American abroad
Finally, a Republican who can pass the purity test. Go idiots!
too bad you can't be impeached for HYPOCRISY!
Per the jury of CNN bloggers, Governor Sanford is guilty-of being a Republican. The sentence: DEATH!
Governor Sanford should do the "right thing" and resign.
It would save the state a lot of money, that we don't have!!!!!
Delleney doesn't fool anyone, particularly me. He and those other republipigs are just trying to save their own political asses, which I don't think it's gonna work.
They would've be doing all of this if Sanford had kept quiet about what he did!
Ross Garber, one of Sanford's attorneys, called the impeachment hearing "an extraordinary and extremely rare process. In a statement released after the meeting, Garber said that the governor's "temporary absence from the state in June" does not merit his removal from office
I Disagree, He was AWOL.
"As was pointed out in the hearing this afternoon, the state Constitution ensures that the chain of command in state government is not threatened because the Lt. Governor is automatically transferred command in the event of an emergency during the governor's temporary absence," Garber said.
He was not absent (sick, personal problem, etc. ...He was Absent without Leave. Why change the subject.
Governor Sanford was not available for comment as he was believed to be "scaling the North face of Everest"
South Carolina has an ETHICS SUBCOMMITTEE?
Where has it been hiding?
When did this happen?