Debate Iran? No, but talks are possible
Washington (CNN) - President Barack Obama has a chance to make good on the campaign pledge he made during the CNN/YouTube debate back in 2008: to sit down with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
This week Ahmadinejad offered to meet "face-to-face" in a debate before the media "to put the world's issues on the table to find out whose solution is better."
The regime in Tehran has repeatedly rebuffed U.S. attempts at engagement, thwarting the international community as it continues to pursue its nuclear program, which it claims is for peaceful purposes. The United States and its allies maintain Iran is seeking to develop a nuclear weapon.
The White House dismissed Ahmadinejad's offer as a theatrics, saying Iran isn't serious about discussing its nuclear ambitions. But senior administration officials say there are serious discussions taking place between the European Union foreign affairs chief, Catherine Ashton, and Iranian nuclear negotiators about resuming talks.
From CNN Politics
- Warnock's seat comes into focus amid battle over voting laws and filibuster rules March 23, 2021 03:06 am
- White House aides prep $3 trillion jobs package for Biden March 23, 2021 02:30 am
- Biden administration continues to deny journalists access to border facilities March 23, 2021 02:28 am
- Arguing against statehood for DC, congressman says it has no car dealerships (it does) March 23, 2021 02:23 am
- Former Capitol riot prosecutor's comments on Trump alarm new no-drama Justice Department March 23, 2021 02:16 am
- Biden administration not confident Johnson & Johnson will meet 20 million goal by end of month March 23, 2021 01:52 am
I would hold talks, but not a public debate on TV as the President of Iran has called for. Our Middle East policy, that was created by bush and continued by Obama, is horrible and only creating more anti-American feelings and more terrorists. We have now spread the bad feelings to Pakistan which is turning against us! At least the people who now view us an enemy by 60%.
When the President was campaigning, I said I thought it was a good idea to sit down with our enemies to see if their can be a deal made. The more I look at the actions of the Iranian government, the more I can care less about them. The people aren't the problem; the government is.
Negotiations are the best possible way. What did we achieve after ten years with Iraq, and Afghanistan? Nothing except looting our treasury. Muslims are religious fanatics. Just tighten Immigration to all Muslim nations, including India. As I told, target employers who hire illegals, and non-citizens....
Talking is far better than war.
The best way to settle this is to have a national poll for or against a debate .
This is something President Obama can do and he will "MOP THE FLOOR" with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – EASILY!!!! – Something President Bush could not do in a thousand years – which is why he didn't!!!!
Bush rather acclaim his SHERIFF status to make others THINK he was "bad to the bones"...NOT!!!
Please take that chance Mr. President!
You will be on your best face to face
at Camp David and at the end visit together Auswich to show him the history of the jews in WW2.
This could be a turning poin and only you can do it!
Ted van Tol
The Netherlands
I think that nukes would work better !
Lets face it,we all know Iran has sealed their fate and know it.Its just a matter of time till they meet their maker.
Talking with a potential adversary is a sign of strength, not weakness.
that is brave of you and maybe crazy brave
to sit down with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is to open up all manner of criticism from the great hole in the world from which all 'no' comes from
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has very little to offer that wouldn't be better served with an entirely new government in place
if that were to happen however what would happen in the vaccum that would ensue: another Iraq? Afganistan? et al.
I just don't see where talking with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gains us anything. Much the same way as I feel about N. Korea. But just as 'W' has better information that the general public (me) have, so do you. I think you are doing a good job (I didn't and don't feel the same way about 'W')