McConnell says he 'cannot support' nuclear arms treaty
December 19th, 2010
10:20 AM ET
12 years ago

McConnell says he 'cannot support' nuclear arms treaty

WASHINGTON (CNN) - Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky voiced opposition Sunday to the New START - a nuclear arms treaty with Russia - saying that members of his party need more time to consider the legislation.

"I've decided I cannot support the treaty," McConnell said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” "I think if they'd taken more time with this, rushing it right before Christmas strikes me as trying to jam us."

He said trying to get a vote before Christmas was not the best way to "get support of people like me," and that GOP senators are "uneasy" about the legislation.

Although he said the administration has told him they're committed to missile defense, he's worried about how Russia and European allies of the United States "view missile defense."

Regarding the timeline for a vote in the Senate, the minority leader said he assumes Democrats are looking to vote on the treaty before Christmas, but that it's unclear whether that will happen. Asked if enough Republicans would join with Democrats to ratify the treaty, he said: "We're going to find out here in the next few days."

The treaty, which has been a top priority for President Obama and Senate Democrats, would resume mutual inspections of U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals while limiting both nations to a certain number of warheads and launchers.

McConnell also said the Senate will pass a short-term measure that would fund the government until March. The chamber approved a similar measure Friday - the day the current resolution expired - to keep the government running until Tuesday night.

McConnell's appearance comes shortly after the White House and Congressional Republicans worked together to pass a tax package. The top Senate Republican said he found working with the president "just fine."

"We weren't sent here to do nothing," McConnell told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley. "If the administration believes they need to go in a different direction and it mirrors the things that I and my members believe is good for the country, we're going to do it."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said he’s “deeply disappointed” by McConnell’s decision not to support START.

“We have spent the last four days on the Senate floor debating the treaty,” Reid said in a statement. “I know many senators, including my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, who share my belief that this treaty is too critical to our national security to delay.”

Watch State of the Union with Candy Crowley Sundays at 9am ET. For the latest from State of the Union click here.

soundoff (80 Responses)
  1. Terry from West Texas

    McConnell is simply sticking to the stall, blame, accuse, and delay strategy that has worked so well for Republicans since 2008 because no Democrat has the courage to stand up to them. He will end up voting for Start, as he well knows, after wasting 8 months arguing over whether the treaty includes a provision for Death Panels.

    December 19, 2010 11:57 am at 11:57 am |
  2. TeeParti

    "I'm glad they won't support this bill which will only make us weaker and russia stronger"

    If this treaty is not signed, the Russians have said point blank they will begin re-arming, as the assumption will stand that the USA is doing the same thing.

    The number 1 danger to the USA right now is loose nukes falling into the hands of terrorists. If this treaty is not signed, then the possibility of that becomes all the more real.

    Therefore, if you oppose this treaty, you are quite literally siding with the terrorists. Why do you hate America?

    December 19, 2010 11:59 am at 11:59 am |
  3. Phaedro

    When you give a mediocre judge from Louisville great power, his fat head and big, gigantic ego will always keep him from his responsibility for his country.

    December 19, 2010 12:00 pm at 12:00 pm |
  4. a in austin

    The old man is still standing with party, not with what's best for WE THE PEOPLE. Eight months is plenty of time to read the bill. It was the party of no who wanted to keep kicking the treaty down the road. Wonder which corporation he needs to "favor up" to by delaying a vote?

    December 19, 2010 12:00 pm at 12:00 pm |
  5. conoclast

    'If it's good for the country...' Sure Mitch, we know which "country" you represent! An unratified START treaty would mean another round of ratcheted-up paranoid defense spending, which of course would make McConnell's real employers VERY happy. We're broke and out-of-work; just what's required to make that situation permanent is to encourage another Cold War! We're no better than the North Koreans!!

    December 19, 2010 12:02 pm at 12:02 pm |
1 2 3 4