Senate passes short-term spending bill
March 17th, 2011
03:22 PM ET
12 years ago

Senate passes short-term spending bill

Washington (CNN) - The Senate easily passed a spending bill Thursday to keep the government funded for three more weeks as lawmakers and the White House work to bridge their deep divide on a larger spending package that will run through September 30, the end of the fiscal year.

The vote was 87 to 13. Four Democrats and nine Republicans voted against it.

The House already passed the stopgap bill, which - at the insistence of Republicans - cuts $6 billion from current funding levels. Now it will go to President Barack Obama to be signed into law.

With support waning for additional short-term spending bills, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle vowed to make this the last temporary measure before striking agreement on a longer-term bill.

For several weeks - and as recently as Wednesday - top aides to the president and congressional leaders have met quietly behind the scenes to resolve their differences over that longer-term bill. Vice President Joe Biden, who was in the Capitol Thursday for a St. Patrick’s Day lunch, stayed on the Hill afterwards to discuss the budget with lawmakers, his spokeswoman told CNN. However, a deal appears unlikely until closer to April 8, when this three-week spending measure expires, according to officials on both sides of the aisle.

Republicans are pushing for about $61 billion in cuts overall while Democrats say they will only accept a fraction of that. Complicating the disagreement over spending levels is the insistence by conservative Republicans that a host of controversial policy changes be included in a long-term bill. The changes would block funding for Planned Parenthood, prevent the implementation of the new health care law, and impose other restrictions opposed by most Democrats.

Despite the stark policy disagreements, Senate Democratic leaders went out of their way to praise House Speaker John Boehner for passing the three-week bill despite a backlash from many conservatives.

“I have to hand a bouquet to Speaker Boehner. He realized he didn’t have enough votes to pass it with Republicans. Rather than pull the bill he went to Democrats and said I need votes and got 85 of them,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said. “That’s the attitude we need to keep moving forward.”

The Democrats who voted against the bill are liberals concerned the cuts are too deep.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, voted for the bill. He complained, however, that Republicans are demanding “unconscionable” cuts from programs for vulnerable Americans including homeless veterans, poor children and pregnant women, while allowing millionaires to enjoy low tax rates.

The nine Republicans who voted no are conservatives who wanted deeper cuts.

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama is the conservative ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee. He voted for bill, calling the $2 billion per week reduction in the short-term spending bill “significant.” However, he said people in Washington remain “in denial about the reality of the crisis we face” in terms of debt.

Filed under: Congress • Senate
soundoff (9 Responses)
  1. Peter

    I'm so glad the government decided to keep working. Now if they could only come up with a real solution to this budget mess, they might be able to get some real work done.
    Both parties are guilty here, and both of them need to be replaced by groups who are actually interested in, you know, governing.

    March 17, 2011 03:31 pm at 3:31 pm |
  2. ConservaFascists/F.U.B.A.R.

    I want to see how Weeper of the House Bonehead is going to negotiate with his Teatard caucus. They won't compromise ant their propsals are to radical to even try and negotiate with deomcrats. Now is the time for ALL democrats to become the Party of NO. It works both ways.

    March 17, 2011 03:36 pm at 3:36 pm |
  3. jerry

    gosh, what a off on a vacation. They know were stupid, after all we voted for them..heck Reid is back in...nothing more to say there.

    March 17, 2011 03:37 pm at 3:37 pm |
  4. peace

    boner the t/p will not like your this seem like you gop has dug your own grave. bring on the shovel.

    March 17, 2011 03:41 pm at 3:41 pm |
  5. Wire Palladin, S. F.

    There has to be a lot of upset older tea baggers who, as a result of the extension, will now get their social security on time. That has to make them mad as hell.

    March 17, 2011 03:45 pm at 3:45 pm |
  6. Lynda/Minnesota

    Republicans have been salivating for years in hopes of getting their hands on Social Security. Thank God Bush wasn't able to advance his wish to privatize it BEFORE the stock market crash in 2007, else our seniors would be in a much worse situation than they are already in. I am forever grateful to Democrats for NOT allowing Bush and others to take MY social security and give it to Wall Street to speculate on. You'd think these greedy SOBs would be satisfied with the billions they have now, but apparently they want it ALL - no matter who suffers the consequences.

    March 17, 2011 03:50 pm at 3:50 pm |
  7. John

    Almost six full months since the start of the Federal fiscal year and STILL no permanent budget? Every single one of those Congresspeople and the President should be fired. Ridiculous that we are still operating on a CR.

    March 17, 2011 03:50 pm at 3:50 pm |
  8. Really?

    How many more times are they going to do this?

    March 17, 2011 04:07 pm at 4:07 pm |
  9. MAC

    The Congress and the President need to "MAN UP" and balance the budget by cutting and if they need the taxes to pay off the debt do so by raising taxes on everyone, including those who do not pay income taxes. They helped make the debt.

    March 17, 2011 04:42 pm at 4:42 pm |