Super PACs prepare for long haul
March 5th, 2012
03:38 PM ET
11 years ago

Super PACs prepare for long haul

Atlanta (CNN) – With the prospects that voting on Tuesday will likely produce a divided outcome, two of the super PACs supporting Republican candidates are already on the air in the states voting next week.

Both Winning Our Future, which is backing Newt Gingrich, and the pro-Mitt Romney Restore Our Future have bought commercial time in Alabama and Mississippi, which vote next Tuesday and which are key Southern contests. Restore Our Future confirmed it has purchased $640,000 of additional air time beginning Wednesday in those two states on top of $715,000 worth of commercials now on the air there.

CNN LIVE:Go to, and CNN Mobile for the CNN Election Roundtable, a live video chat hosted by Wolf Blitzer and the CNN political team, on Tuesday at 12 p.m. ET. Tune in this week for live coverage of the primaries on Super Tuesday on, on the CNN apps and on the CNN mobile web site. Follow CNN Politics on Facebook and on Twitter at #cnnelections.

- Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

In the four states voting this Tuesday where all of the candidates are participating and which have the largest delegates at stake (Georgia, Ohio, Oklahoma and Tennessee) the super PACs supporting Romney, Gingrich and Rick Santorum will have spent more than $8 million for television commercials by the time of the primary. That is much more than the three candidates' campaigns they are supporting. The super PACs are also mounting efforts behind the scenes to spread their messages: making phone calls, sending mailers and some even hiring field staff illustrating how instrumental they have become.

"I think in some cases they are actually bigger than a campaign. I think they are not only a shadow campaign but larger," Curt Anderson, a veteran media consultant who worked for the Rick Perry campaign this year, said.

One voter in Tulsa, Oklahoma received a phone call in three consecutive days last week from Restore Our Future, the super PAC backing Romney.

According to the voter, the narrator of the call said "Rick Santorum has a history," a reference to his votes for congressional earmarks when he was in the Senate. It went on to say liberals are scared because "They know Mitt Romney is the only candidate who can beat Barack Obama in November."

"You know the facts about Rick Santorum's record as a big spending Washington insider," the call continued.

Voters in Tennessee got a mailing from the Red, White and Blue Fund, which is supporting Santorum's bid, touting his conservative backers, including a quote from radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh calling the candidate "the least corrupted, who has the least number of periods of wandering off the reservation."

The pro-Gingrich Winning Our Future previously deployed a small number of field staff to help push Gingrich.

Because these committees can raise unlimited funds and don't have to worry about supporting a presidential campaign apparatus, they have more resources to commit.

"We have an ability to raise more money that a candidate does," said Rick Tyler, an adviser to Winning Our Future.

Tyler said he sees his group's function as "expanding the campaign's capabilities" and to supplement it.

"We will do everything a campaign will do" except move the candidate around, Tyler said. "We think like a campaign."

One complication for these groups: since they can't coordinate activities with candidates they have to make their best judgments about the messages they should be emphasizing. They watch what the candidates say and what the public messages of the campaigns. Also, these organizations often have employees who have previously worked with the candidates so they know them pretty well.

One advantage for the campaigns is that the attack messages put out by these groups don't carry the footprint of the individual candidates, although the PACs have to make sure they don't do anything that would bring negative attention.

When Winning Our Future aired ads criticizing Romney's time as head of Bain Capital, some conservatives criticized the group as attacking capitalism. Tyler said he wanted to make sure those ads didn't do more damage than good.

"I do think we helped Newt in South Carolina," Tyler said.

Anderson previously worked for the Republican National Committee touting candidates separately from the campaigns and said he made sure his efforts would not end up hurting them.

"You really are terrified. Does something blow up? [It's] not going to just hurt myself but hurt the campaign," he said.

- Follow Kevin Bohn on Twitter @KevinBohnCNN.

Filed under: 2012 • Ads • Republicans
soundoff (8 Responses)
  1. Mikey

    Shame on the Supreme Court.

    "We have an ability to raise more money that a candidate does," said Rick Tyler, an adviser to Winning Our Future. Tyler said he sees his group's function as "expanding the campaign's capabilities" and to supplement it. "We will do everything a campaign will do" except move the candidate around, Tyler said. "We think like a campaign."

    I though these groups were supposed to be about issues.

    March 5, 2012 03:45 pm at 3:45 pm |
  2. Rudy NYC

    Whatever happened to Newt Gingrich's $100 million sponsor? Big talk, no money.

    March 5, 2012 03:49 pm at 3:49 pm |
  3. Dave

    It is a fact that tens of millions is coming in from overseas, from mormons & corporations right into Mitts superpacs. NICE GOING SCALIA & CO!!!!!

    March 5, 2012 03:56 pm at 3:56 pm |
  4. Anonymous

    A corrupt SCOTUS decision leads to more corruption. What a surprise.

    March 5, 2012 04:44 pm at 4:44 pm |
  5. Peace

    I ask myself what is the motivation of these Super PACs throwing money as if they are throwing sand in the ocean? I guess Super PACs are more dangerous than Washington insiders.

    March 5, 2012 04:45 pm at 4:45 pm |
  6. kat

    Is our country being bought and paid for by super PACs ?

    March 5, 2012 05:44 pm at 5:44 pm |
  7. clearance

    Most Russians voted for Putin who appears to be the only one in boosting their economy; but we have no Putin, sad... No one can help us, we may have to print more dollar bills, while starting two more wars against our shadow enemies.

    March 5, 2012 06:44 pm at 6:44 pm |
  8. CD

    Gotta agree with some here that SCOTUS really screwed up with their ruling as its unleashed the very thing the law was meant to curtail....that being corporations buying elections and candidates by providing them assistance in their campaigns.
    Bad decision Scotus......very bad.

    March 5, 2012 07:54 pm at 7:54 pm |