June 17th, 2012
09:02 AM ET
9 years ago

Immigration change not political, Plouffe asserts

(CNN) – President Barack Obama's senior adviser maintained Sunday the White House's decision to stop deporting some young illegal immigrants was in no way designed to curry favor within the Latino community months ahead of November's general election.

David Plouffe, speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," said the move was one in a series of steps already taken to allow the Department of Homeland Security greater discretion in enforcing America's immigration laws.

- Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

- Check out the CNN Electoral Map and Calculator and game out your own strategy for November.

"This is not a political move," Plouffe told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley. "It builds on steps we've already taken."

Pressed on the timing of the decision – less than five months from a general election in which Latinos could play a deciding role – Plouffe said the politics of the move were not yet clear.

"Who knows how the politics will turn out," Plouffe said. "This decision was the right decision. We'll see. I've ceased making predictions on things because we'll see how they turn out."

Obama won more than two-thirds of Latino voters in 2008, and polls show him leading his Republican opponent Mitt Romney among the demographic in 2012. Latino voters are considered key to winning the 2012 presidential election since they make up a large, growing chunk of the American electorate. They also represent a significant part of the population in several important swing states, including Florida, Nevada and Colorado.

Mobilizing members of the Latino community to vote, however, will remain a challenge for Obama as he enters the heat of the general election campaign. A study from the Pew Hispanic Center from the 2010 midterm elections indicated that while Latinos comprise an increasing chunk of the eligible American electorate, their representation at the polls is lower than their representation in the general population.

Obama's opponents have claimed the timing of Friday's decision revealed carefully calculated politics designed to mobilize his base of Latino supporters. They also say Obama, in bypassing Congress, ignored the Constitutional requirements of lawmaking.

Plouffe said Sunday the new immigration directive was within the power of the White House.

"This is fully within our ability," Plouffe said. "Again, this was an enforcement discretion decision. This is not amnesty. This is not citizenship. This gives these hardworking kids, who are here through no fault of their own, who are staffing our labs, start our businesses, serve in our military, a two-year period to apply for work authorization."

Plouffe criticized Romney for his immigration stance, pointing to the Republican's promise to veto the DREAM Act, a piece of legislation that would offer a path to citizenship for minors in the country illegally, providing they served in the armed forces or attended college. The initiative has not gained enough support to pass Congress despite several attempts.

"We need a permanent fix, we agree," Plouffe said, making clear the new rules announced Friday did not constitute such a fix. "The only way to do that if for Congress to pass the DREAM act. Sadly, Governor Romney has said he would veto the DREAM act."

Filed under: 2012 • David Plouffe • President Obama
soundoff (33 Responses)
  1. wrm

    I can disagree with policy and still respect the decision as being either the privilege of the office and/or a reflection of the will of the people that person represents but I don't like having my intelligence insulted. The idea that this announcement wasn't political is laughable, the announcement that it wasn't, an insult.

    June 17, 2012 03:21 pm at 3:21 pm |
  2. Bill in CA.

    That is the biggest bunch of horse crap to come out of this drones mouth yet...

    June 17, 2012 03:22 pm at 3:22 pm |
  3. JohnReedjr

    You know, fools, the American memory lasts about three weeks. If Obama did this to woo the Latino vote he would have waited until October. Besides he already has 68% of the Hispanic vote. No One will remember this in November.

    June 17, 2012 03:29 pm at 3:29 pm |
  4. Marry

    For some young illegal immigrants it is surely not a „political“ move but one that has real impact on their lives. If the GOP Congress of “NO” would not want to prevent “everything”, a permanent solution surly would have long been found! But, typical GOP does nothing for 99% of the people but blame and complain!

    June 17, 2012 03:48 pm at 3:48 pm |
  5. Josh

    Of course it's political. If it's not why did the "right thing to do" take a backseat until election season was heating up? This is a stunt to play latinos like a fiddle and energize them for the democrats. Also Obama saying he has the power to do this is no reassurance considering that according to Obama he can assassinate Americans, go to war on his own, etc. etc.

    June 17, 2012 03:53 pm at 3:53 pm |
  6. ThinkAgain

    So what if it is political? It's the right thing to do – and the President wouldn't have had to take action if the GOP wasn't blocking EVERYTHING and actually DID something for the benefit of our country!

    June 17, 2012 03:55 pm at 3:55 pm |
  7. flopflipper

    He says its not political, and then he ends with, "The only way to do that if for Congress to pass the DREAM act. Sadly, Governor Romney has said he would veto the DREAM act."

    Not political at all!

    June 17, 2012 04:16 pm at 4:16 pm |
  8. aaron

    Not a Repub fan in the least, but Obama's move was obviously political. He's had 3.5 years to issue executives orders on deporting illegals, but he waits until less than 5 months before the presidential election to do it. What his not too bright advisors didn't take into account is that illegal aliens can't vote for president, and he's risking a backlash from citizens that are sick of the DC crowd not enforcing the immigration laws that they passed.

    June 17, 2012 04:37 pm at 4:37 pm |
1 2