Texas, international election monitors face off
October 25th, 2012
06:24 PM ET
9 years ago

Texas, international election monitors face off

Washington (CNN) – The presence of international monitors observing next week's presidential and Congressional election has caused a firestorm among voter ID law supporters and, particularly, the Texas attorney general.

The reservations came after the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) announced it is sending dozens of monitors from around the world to monitor the upcoming presidential and Congressional elections.

- Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker

- Check out the CNN Electoral Map and Calculator and game out your own strategy for November.

The OSCE, which sends monitoring teams to elections around the world, has been observing U.S. elections since 2002, when the Bush administration invited them after the hotly contested 2000 presidential election. They are expected to observe in 15 states on November 6th.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott Thursday wrote a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expressing his displeasure with the OSCE's approach, stating that "an unnecessary political agenda may have infected OSCE's election monitoring." Texas law, he notes, does not allow "unauthorized individuals" within 100 feet of polling places. He asked Clinton to work with the OSCE to ensure the group abides by the state law or they will risk "legal consequences."

OSCE's team for the U.S. elections has 13 international experts based in Washington D.C. and 44 long-term observers to be deployed throughout the country. The OSCE called it "the largest Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe parliamentary delegation to ever observe a North American election."

"We are not coming to judge a result but to report about the process," said Joao Soares, a Portuguese member of parliament who is helping coordinate monitoring effort, in a statement on the group's website. "In a country so well-known for its diverse citizenry, we will observe how inclusive the election process is in line with the country's own laws and international election commitments."

The monitoring team issued an interim report last week warning "recent state-level legislative initiatives to limit early voting and introduce stricter voter identification have become highly polarized. Democrats are concerned that these would disenfranchise eligible voters, while Republicans believe they are necessary to protect the integrity of the vote."

This week a group of civil rights groups, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the League of Women Voters, sent a letter to Daan Evarts, head of the OSCE mission, urging him to send monitors to states where voter ID laws and early voting restrictions "voting have been most extensive-Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Texas and Wisconsin."

The letter also urged Everts to send monitors to Colorado, North Carolina and Virginia. Most of these are considered battleground states in the presidential election.

In a letter to Everts, Texas Attorney General Abbott noted the OSCE identified voter ID laws as a barrier to the right to vote and is being urged by voter ID opponents "to monitor states that have taken steps to protect ballot integrity by enacting voter ID laws."

"The OSCE may be entitled to its opinions about voter ID laws, but your opinion is legally irrelevant in the United States, where the Supreme Court has already determined that voter ID laws are constitutional," Abbott wrote. "Groups and individuals from outside the United States are not allowed to influence or interfere with the election process in Texas."

In addition to visiting polling stations on Election Day, the OSCE monitors have already met with federal, state and local officials and candidates since starting their work earlier this month, according to the Vienna-based agency.

But in his letter to Everts, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott warned OSCE representatives are not authorized by Texas law to enter a polling place and then stated they could face criminal prosecution for coming within 100 feet of a polling place.

State Department Spokesperson Victoria Nuland said Texas was the only state to her knowledge that came forward with reservations, but that the OSCE has since sent a letter, both to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to Texas authorities reassuring them that "OSCE observers are committed to following all U.S. laws and regulations as they do in any country where they observe elections."

But Janez Lenarčič, the Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights which oversees election monitoring, also shared his concerns about Abbot's threats in his letter to Clinton.

"The threat of criminal sanctions against OSCE/ODIHR observers is unacceptable," Lenarčič said. "The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections."

He called concerns that election observers would interfere with the election process "groundless" and stressed OSCE observers adhere to all national laws of the countries whose elections they are monitoring.

"Our observers are required to remain strictly impartial and not to intervene in the voting process in any way," Lenarčič said. "They are in the United States to observe these elections, not to interfere in them."

Also on the CNN Political Ticker

- McCain says Mourdock endorsement up in the air

- Obama: The 'other guy' is a 'bulls**ter'

- Romney beats back on 'horses and bayonets'

- Obama's Facebook warning

Filed under: 2012 • Texas
soundoff (346 Responses)
  1. Ben Gay

    Then observe it on TV like i will be doing

    October 25, 2012 06:29 pm at 6:29 pm |
  2. Lisa P

    What does Texas have to hide?

    October 25, 2012 06:31 pm at 6:31 pm |
  3. john oh

    Independents and Obama Skeptics:

    Your lifetime risk to develop invasive cancer as a man: 44%(almost 1 out of 2 odds) Statistics from Cancer org.
    Your lifetime risk to develop invasive cancer as a woman: 38% (over 1 out of 3 odds) Statistics from Cancer org.

    You are going to be glad that Obamacare exists if you fall into this statistical range. Cancer does not care what political affiliation you have. Just think about that for a while, and then think about the fact that Romney wants to remove protections for pre-existing conditions and bring back lifetime caps on insurance benefits...

    Do you really want to have to flip that coin?

    Obama/Biden 2012 – With a healthy, educated, and secure workforce, America will prosper.

    October 25, 2012 06:35 pm at 6:35 pm |
  4. Bren

    This is a US election and they have no right to be here. I am glad I live in texas and they stand up to this kind of phony liberal bias.

    October 25, 2012 06:38 pm at 6:38 pm |
  5. mike271828

    About time some sunlight was let in on the dirty politics of Texas. Having international inspectors observe elections is a good way to do that. And it just what the US is always (rightly) pushing other countries to accept.

    October 25, 2012 06:42 pm at 6:42 pm |
  6. kemikal

    Yes, Texas; anything to prevent interference in the Good Ole Boy System down there. People of color be prepared for anything!

    October 25, 2012 06:47 pm at 6:47 pm |
  7. Wake up People!

    What's wrong with impartial monitors?? Unless you have something to hide.... They are there to observe. What's wrong with that?? Oh shoot, it will be harder for the rethuglicans to cheat. Silly me for forgetting.

    OBAMA 2012!

    October 25, 2012 06:49 pm at 6:49 pm |
  8. ndnation23

    lmao, so true the vote can go and intimidate and try and invalidate voters, but outside monitors arent allowed? WOW

    October 25, 2012 06:50 pm at 6:50 pm |
  9. Dominican mama 4 Obama

    Why is Texas protesting so much?

    October 25, 2012 06:55 pm at 6:55 pm |
  10. becky

    We should never be afraid to have monitors overseeing our elections. WE are a free and open society and our elections should be a model for other countries. What is Texas afraid of? Will they be trying to stop some people form voting? They certainly have tried to put through some laws that would have made it difficult of some people to vote. Everyone needs to remember that voting is the single greatest privilege we have in this country and no one, no one, has the right to take that away for frivolous reasons.

    October 25, 2012 07:00 pm at 7:00 pm |
  11. BlkPwr817

    We're not going to fall for it. All the voter law have been struck down for a reason...

    Obama 2012!

    October 25, 2012 07:03 pm at 7:03 pm |
  12. edog

    Why is this a problem now, for the AG of Texas? They have been doing this for 12 years now...

    October 25, 2012 07:03 pm at 7:03 pm |
  13. obama is a let down

    so sad...let focus on the us elections not russia china or wherever else

    October 25, 2012 07:06 pm at 7:06 pm |
  14. Anonymous

    The United States is political corrupt and to protect our citizens from this corruption, outside observation is warranted.
    When Texas wants to become its own country, then it can dictate what ever it chooses.

    October 25, 2012 07:06 pm at 7:06 pm |
  15. Vote for Seamus, elect Kolob's next dog catcher

    Texas got something to hide.

    Oops, should not have revealed that.

    October 25, 2012 07:07 pm at 7:07 pm |
  16. GOP = Greed Over People!

    Sounds like President Perry and the United State of Texass has something to hide, otw, why complain about a procedure planted by the shrub?

    (Quiggle). Apologies, I REALLYtried to type it out without laughing!

    October 25, 2012 07:09 pm at 7:09 pm |
  17. Sniffit

    Blatant skew to this article. CNN has entirely skipped the first part: FIRST, Abbot sent a letter to OSCE, beligerently threatening to "prosecute" any of them that attempted to observe polls in TX. This prompted the OSCE to send a letter to Clinton wondering what Abbott was ranting about, so THEN Abbot sent the letter to Clinton. CNN skipped the parts that showed just how unhinged Abbot was behaving.


    October 25, 2012 07:11 pm at 7:11 pm |
  18. badcyclist

    Texas Republicans are more paranoid and more secretive than tinhorn dictators. There might be a reason for that.

    October 25, 2012 07:21 pm at 7:21 pm |
  19. Allen Hussein

    Can we just let Texas secede and be done with it?

    October 25, 2012 07:25 pm at 7:25 pm |
  20. Former Republican, now an Independent

    Thanks to the neo-cons who now control the republican party, U.S. election now have no more credibility than 3rd world countries. The supreme court's ruling to allow secretive donors and unlimited amounts of money to campaigns, along with the actual stealing of the 2000 election has destroyed the confidence the world once had in American elections.

    October 25, 2012 07:26 pm at 7:26 pm |
  21. kayla

    if they had done a good job when bush was running, we would not be in the mess we are in.and bush would not have won since after the cheating.

    October 25, 2012 07:31 pm at 7:31 pm |
  22. scarf

    Sort of makes you wonder what Texas is afraid these observers might see?

    October 25, 2012 08:23 pm at 8:23 pm |
  23. Grahame Rhodes

    Yeh sure they will scream but we all remember how W won the White House CHEATING

    October 25, 2012 08:33 pm at 8:33 pm |
  24. Ken

    Something to hide?

    October 25, 2012 08:41 pm at 8:41 pm |
  25. Liz the First

    This is great news! we need outside observers to keep our elections honest. the rethugs have been doing everything to disenfranchise every possible voter in the name of combatting 'voter fraud,' which, according to another article here, they are perpetrating themselves! repugs don't believe in two-party government, they believe in one-party (theirs) rule! we already saw what they would stoop to in florida in 2000 when bush usurped the presidency with the help of his brother and some goon squads. if people truly love this country, they have to turn their backs on this treasonous bunch.

    October 25, 2012 08:54 pm at 8:54 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14