January 16th, 2013
02:09 PM ET
10 years ago

Transcript: Obama announces gun violence agenda

(CNN) - Flanked by children who wrote letters concerned about gun violence and speaking before family members of those who lost loved ones to shootings, President Barack Obama laid out his gun proposals Wednesday before signing 23 executive actions that don't require congressional approval.

Read the transcript after the jump.

Thank you, everybody. Please have a seat. Good afternoon, everybody.

Let me begin by thanking our Vice President, Joe Biden, for your dedication, Joe, to this issue, for bringing so many different voices to the table. Because while reducing gun violence is a complicated challenge, protecting our children from harm shouldn't be a divisive one.

Over the month since the tragedy in Newtown, we've heard from so many, and, obviously, none have affected us more than the families of those gorgeous children and their teachers and guardians who were lost. And so we're grateful to all of you for taking the time to be here, and recognizing that we honor their memories in part by doing everything we can to prevent this from happening again.

But we also heard from some unexpected people. In particular, I started getting a lot of letters from kids. Four of them are here today - Grant Fritz, Julia Stokes, Hinna Zeejah, and Teja Goode. They're pretty representative of some of the messages that I got. These are some pretty smart letters from some pretty smart young people.

Hinna, a third-grader - you can go ahead and wave, Hinna. That's you - (laughter.) Hinna wrote, "I feel terrible for the parents who lost their children…I love my country and [I] want everybody to be happy and safe."

And then, Grant - go ahead and wave, Grant. (Laughter.) Grant said, "I think there should be some changes. We should learn from what happened at Sandy Hook…I feel really bad."

And then, Julia said - Julia, where are you? There you go - "I'm not scared for my safety, I'm scared for others. I have four brothers and sisters and I know I would not be able to bear the thought of losing any of them."

These are our kids. This is what they're thinking about. And so what we should be thinking about is our responsibility to care for them, and shield them from harm, and give them the tools they need to grow up and do everything that they're capable of doing - not just to pursue their own dreams, but to help build this country. This is our first task as a society, keeping our children safe. This is how we will be judged. And their voices should compel us to change.

And that's why, last month, I asked Joe to lead an effort, along with members of my Cabinet, to come up with some concrete steps we can take right now to keep our children safe, to help prevent mass shootings, to reduce the broader epidemic of gun violence in this country.

And we can't put this off any longer. Just last Thursday, as TV networks were covering one of Joe's meetings on this topic, news broke of another school shooting, this one in California. In the month since 20 precious children and six brave adults were violently taken from us at Sandy Hook Elementary, more than 900 of our fellow Americans have reportedly died at the end of a gun - 900 in the past month. And every day we wait, that number will keep growing.

So I'm putting forward a specific set of proposals based on the work of Joe's task force. And in the days ahead, I intend to use whatever weight this office holds to make them a reality. Because while there is no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely, no piece of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil, if there is even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there is even one life that can be saved, then we've got an obligation to try.

And I'm going to do my part. As soon as I'm finished speaking here, I will sit at that desk and I will sign a directive giving law enforcement, schools, mental health professionals and the public health community some of the tools they need to help reduce gun violence.

We will make it easier to keep guns out of the hands of criminals by strengthening the background check system. We will help schools hire more resource officers if they want them and develop emergency preparedness plans. We will make sure mental health professionals know their options for reporting threats of violence - even as we acknowledge that someone with a mental illness is far more likely to be a victim of violent crime than the perpetrator.

And while year after year, those who oppose even modest gun safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control to go ahead and study the best ways to reduce it - and Congress should fund research into the effects that violent video games have on young minds. We don't benefit from ignorance. We don't benefit from not knowing the science of this epidemic of violence.

These are a few of the 23 executive actions that I'm announcing today. But as important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute for action from members of Congress. To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act - and Congress must act soon. And I'm calling on Congress to pass some very specific proposals right away.

First: It's time for Congress to require a universal background check for anyone trying to buy a gun. (Applause.) The law already requires licensed gun dealers to run background checks, and over the last 14 years that's kept 1.5 million of the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun. But it's hard to enforce that law when as many as 40 percent of all gun purchases are conducted without a background check. That's not safe. That's not smart. It's not fair to responsible gun buyers or sellers.

If you want to buy a gun - whether it's from a licensed dealer or a private seller - you should at least have to show you are not a felon or somebody legally prohibited from buying one. This is common sense. And an overwhelming majority of Americans agree with us on the need for universal background checks - including more than 70 percent of the National Rifle Association's members, according to one survey. So there's no reason we can't do this.

Second: Congress should restore a ban on military-style assault weapons, and a 10-round limit for magazines. (Applause.) The type of assault rifle used in Aurora, for example, when paired with high-capacity magazines, has one purpose - to pump out as many bullets as possible, as quickly as possible; to do as much damage, using bullets often designed to inflict maximum damage.

And that's what allowed the gunman in Aurora to shoot 70 people - 70 people - killing 12 in a matter of minutes. Weapons designed for the theater of war have no place in a movie theater. A majority of Americans agree with us on this.

And, by the way, so did Ronald Reagan, one of the staunchest defenders of the Second Amendment, who wrote to Congress in 1994, urging them - this is Ronald Reagan speaking - urging them to "listen to the American public and to the law enforcement community and support a ban on the further manufacture of [military-style assault] weapons." (Applause.)

And finally, Congress needs to help, rather than hinder, law enforcement as it does its job. We should get tougher on people who buy guns with the express purpose of turning around and selling them to criminals. And we should severely punish anybody who helps them do this. Since Congress hasn't confirmed a director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in six years, they should confirm Todd Jones, who will be - who has been Acting, and I will be nominating for the post. (Applause.)

And at a time when budget cuts are forcing many communities to reduce their police force, we should put more cops back on the job and back on our streets.

Let me be absolutely clear. Like most Americans, I believe the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. I respect our strong tradition of gun ownership and the rights of hunters and sportsmen. There are millions of responsible, law-abiding gun owners in America who cherish their right to bear arms for hunting, or sport, or protection, or collection.

I also believe most gun owners agree that we can respect the Second Amendment while keeping an irresponsible, law-breaking few from inflicting harm on a massive scale. I believe most of them agree that if America worked harder to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people, there would be fewer atrocities like the one that occurred in Newtown. That's what these reforms are designed to do. They're common-sense measures. They have the support of the majority of the American people.

And yet, that doesn't mean any of this is going to be easy to enact or implement. If it were, we'd already have universal background checks. The ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines never would have been allowed to expire. More of our fellow Americans might still be alive, celebrating birthdays and anniversaries and graduations.

This will be difficult. There will be pundits and politicians and special interest lobbyists publicly warning of a tyrannical, all-out assault on liberty - not because that's true, but because they want to gin up fear or higher ratings or revenue for themselves. And behind the scenes, they'll do everything they can to block any common-sense reform and make sure nothing changes whatsoever.

The only way we will be able to change is if their audience, their constituents, their membership says this time must be different - that this time, we must do something to protect our communities and our kids.

I will put everything I've got into this, and so will Joe. But I tell you, the only way we can change is if the American people demand it. And by the way, that doesn't just mean from certain parts of the country. We're going to need voices in those areas, in those congressional districts, where the tradition of gun ownership is strong to speak up and to say this is important. It can't just be the usual suspects. We have to examine ourselves and our hearts, and ask ourselves what is important.

This will not happen unless the American people demand it. If parents and teachers, police officers and pastors, if hunters and sportsmen, if responsible gun owners, if Americans of every background stand up and say, enough; we've suffered too much pain and care too much about our children to allow this to continue - then change will come. That's what it's going to take.

In the letter that Julia wrote me, she said, "I know that laws have to be passed by Congress, but I beg you to try very hard." (Laughter.) Julia, I will try very hard. But she's right. The most important changes we can make depend on congressional action. They need to bring these proposals up for a vote, and the American people need to make sure that they do.

Get them on record. Ask your member of Congress if they support universal background checks to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Ask them if they support renewing a ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. And if they say no, ask them why not. Ask them what's more important - doing whatever it takes to get a A grade from the gun lobby that funds their campaigns, or giving parents some peace of mind when they drop their child off for first grade? (Applause.)

This is the land of the free, and it always will be. As Americans, we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights that no man or government can take away from us. But we've also long recognized, as our Founders recognized, that with rights come responsibilities. Along with our freedom to live our lives as we will comes an obligation to allow others to do the same. We don't live in isolation. We live in a society, a government of, and by, and for the people. We are responsible for each other.

The right to worship freely and safely, that right was denied to Sikhs in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. The right to assemble peaceably, that right was denied shoppers in Clackamas, Oregon, and moviegoers in Aurora, Colorado. That most fundamental set of rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness - fundamental rights that were denied to college students at Virginia Tech, and high school students at Columbine, and elementary school students in Newtown, and kids on street corners in Chicago on too frequent a basis to tolerate, and all the families who've never imagined that they'd lose a loved one to a bullet - those rights are at stake. We're responsible.

When I visited Newtown last month, I spent some private time with many of the families who lost their children that day. And one was the family of Grace McDonald. Grace's parents are here. Grace was seven years old when she was struck down - just a gorgeous, caring, joyful little girl. I'm told she loved pink. She loved the beach. She dreamed of becoming a painter.

And so just before I left, Chris, her father, gave me one of her paintings, and I hung it in my private study just off the Oval Office. And every time I look at that painting, I think about Grace. And I think about the life that she lived and the life that lay ahead of her, and most of all, I think about how, when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now - for Grace. For the 25 other innocent children and devoted educators who had so much left to give. For the men and women in big cities and small towns who fall victim to senseless violence each and every day. For all the Americans who are counting on us to keep them safe from harm. Let's do the right thing. Let's do the right thing for them, and for this country that we love so much. (Applause.)

Thank you. Let's sign these orders. (Applause.)

Filed under: Congress • Gun rights • Joe Biden • NRA • President Obama
soundoff (24 Responses)
  1. Gurgyl

    This president has guts. He has all my love and respect. We are now traveling in a right direction than ever before. God bless. Congress needs to pass gun control to get respect.

    January 16, 2013 02:11 pm at 2:11 pm |
  2. critical thinking

    If you take our deficit spending under Obama and divide it evenly among the roughly 300 million American citizens, that works out to just over $17,000 per person, so after you sign this bill to help protect those children that are flanking you Mr. President, you might want to ask them for their $17,000 while you have them there. These deficits will most likely harm our children more than any bullets.

    January 16, 2013 02:21 pm at 2:21 pm |
  3. GuestAgain

    I agree with the "agenda" part...

    January 16, 2013 02:27 pm at 2:27 pm |
  4. Rudy NYC

    For those of you who are woefully misinformed,

    Executive Orders are directives issued by the POTUS to specify how *existing* laws are to be carried out and enforced. The POTUS is the only citizen or law enforement official who has the authority to issue executive orders regarding how laws are to be implemented. Furthermore, executive orders remain in effect until the end of the presidents term, or unless specifically superseded by a later executive order.

    January 16, 2013 02:40 pm at 2:40 pm |
  5. Larry L

    The argument for military-style weapons always comes back to a ridiculous belief that the 2nd Amendment serves as some sort of validation for extremists to arm themselves for the overthrow of the federal government – a sort of "traitor's law". If so Tim McVeigh would be authorized to attack the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. He simply followed his 2nd Amendment "right" to decide when our government was oppressive. Nonsense! The 2nd was intended to help a poor nation have a military reserve able to quash mob rule, discourage slave revolt, prevent competing states from expanding their territories, and to discourage foreign nations from attacking. It also does not describe the "arms" allowed as part of our right to bear "arms" – the military assumption is ultra-right-wing fabrications. Now is the time for common sense – not N.R.A. sound-bites about the President's children

    January 16, 2013 02:49 pm at 2:49 pm |
  6. cgs

    The kids are phony. They don't write letters about this stuff unless an adult prompts them. Solve the problems through congress, BO, and don't be phony about it.

    January 16, 2013 02:50 pm at 2:50 pm |
  7. jpmichigan

    I just wish that the Attorney General would enact the laws already on the books, not just regarding guns, but immigration. The biggest abuser of gun and immigrations laws is our Federal government. We need to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, and yet our own federal government bought them to be given to Mexican cartel. LOL

    January 16, 2013 02:52 pm at 2:52 pm |
  8. Ed1

    Rudy NYC you always ask for proof look it up more children are killed by autos backing over them than mass shooting 50 children a week.

    Need to take all the autos off the road right now that do not have back up cameras.

    Everyone needs to take a chill pill.
    I agree that the mentally ill shouldn't be allowed to buy guns but it's not the guns but the people.
    According to USA Weekend 1-11-1-13-2013 60 children that's right 60 children are killed every week by cars and trucks that back over them. Should we ban all cars and trucks that don't have backup cameras no we should hold people accountable and should be the same case with guns. Why don't we have the same outrage about people backing over children that's easy no press coverage.
    Every time something happens with guns it's front page news and when you look at all the people that buy guns tell me how many of them go out and commit mass murders not that many because they follow the laws that are in place now.
    All I heard was when we are allowed to get a concealed weapons permit murders would go threw the roof guess what they went down.
    Take a breath and let's discuss the terrible murder of 20 children at a school and act like we have some common sense and not some knee jerk reaction.
    A ban on all semi automatic weapons is not only stupid but the people that are pushing this really don't have a clue about guns and how they work.
    I keep hearing that we should ban all assault weapons we don't have any on the market now. An assault weapon is a gun that can fire three rounds with one pull of the trigger, fire one round with one pull of the trigger, and car fire full automatic with just holding the trigger down. It just about the hardest permit to get is for a fully automatic weapon and if you want to put a cost on that why not charge $50,000 a year for each permit.
    Please know what you are talking about before you take the same path as almost every socialist and communist country out there in the world. It wouldn't take long before that could happen with all the BS going on out there right now and that includes Obama and his party.

    January 16, 2013 02:52 pm at 2:52 pm |
  9. Larry L

    @critical thinking
    ===================================================================================================== You folks always forget why the President was forced to resort to deficit spending. Remember Bush? The guy who issued the first bailout package? The guy who ran a cut & spend economy including two unfunded wars? With over 8 million jobs lost before the President took office we were already in a deep, Republican-dug hole. Let's be clear – you guys are always complaining that "liberals" blame Bush. That's because it was his fault! Duh!

    January 16, 2013 02:55 pm at 2:55 pm |
  10. Jules

    Now we shalll see if John Boehner has the guts to let the proposals the president made come to the floor of the House for a vote. Every Congressmen and Senator should have to be on record with where they stand on these issues.

    January 16, 2013 02:56 pm at 2:56 pm |
  11. Jules

    To critical thinking – why don't you try it sometime.

    January 16, 2013 02:57 pm at 2:57 pm |
  12. Rudy NYC

    critical thinking

    If you take our deficit spending under Obama and divide it evenly among the roughly 300 million American citizens, that works out to just over $17,000 per person, so after you sign this bill to help protect those children that are flanking you Mr. President, you might want to ask them for their $17,000 while you have them there. These deficits will most likely harm our children more than any bullets.
    Don't blame Pres. Obama for the economic road that Republicans set us on during their reign of propserity under GWB. Furthermore, as much as the right wing likes to blame "failed Obama policies" there is not one "failed Obama policy" that you can point a finger at. Every time that Pres. Obama has tried to change courses, the right wing has filibustered every bill that has come before the Senate. Obama's "failed economic policies" have been a continuation of the failed policies begun under GWB because the Republicans have held his nose to their grind stone, ensuring that no significant changes were enacted.

    January 16, 2013 03:06 pm at 3:06 pm |
  13. Paul

    How about breaking down the 900 killed since sin entered the world?

    What commonality do they share? Geography? Demographics? Maybe start with the worst segment and then work towards the 4% of firearms deaths? Or are those questions you don't want to hear the answers to?

    January 16, 2013 03:11 pm at 3:11 pm |
  14. Larry L

    People need to actually read the Executive Orders before whining. They don't do anything radical. Nothing. The President expects Congress to debate the most controversial issues and take a stand. Read them – then open your pie holes.

    January 16, 2013 03:14 pm at 3:14 pm |
  15. Matvei Leshchyov

    The people in the comments of the main article on CNN need to come here to read this transcript, it might stop a lot of the anger in there about Obama apparently wanting to ban all guns.

    January 16, 2013 03:21 pm at 3:21 pm |
  16. garrick

    some people just hate the President because of the color of his skin,and that's what people need to really just say.Repulican Presidents band guns and you went along with it,everything this man has tried to do white Republicans have said NO. that's why your party will never when back the White house unless you cheat.like you tried to do but people went out to vote.so just Stop being hatful.

    Tampa Fl

    January 16, 2013 03:25 pm at 3:25 pm |
  17. Sniffit

    "Read them – then open your pie holes."

    Robot parrots can't read.

    January 16, 2013 03:37 pm at 3:37 pm |
  18. Mitchell

    The 2nd amendment give everyone the right to own a musket. Do you NRA types really think the found father would approve of todays weapon. I think not. I believe that the intention of the founding fathers was the right to join a STATE GUARD to protect your state.

    Todays NRA is nothing more that the paid lobbists to gun manufactures. Why would anyone need a weapon with a clip of 30-100 rounds? I have hunted for more than 50 years and have never needed more than 3 rounds to harvest an animal.

    Home protection is easly handled by my 12 gauge shotgun.

    January 16, 2013 03:45 pm at 3:45 pm |
  19. GuestAgain

    Critical Thinking – The prez changed his mind on that: no longer is it unpatriotic, irresponsible, etc to pass the debt on to our kids and theirs. It's all good now, he said so.

    On another note, I see when logic runs out the race card comes into play. Good work dems.

    January 16, 2013 03:50 pm at 3:50 pm |
  20. James Bond

    Critical thinking, what a tool, still thinks he can spew republican talking points taht have long since been disproven, take some of the time you waste trying to con people, and do some research, you sound unbelievably racist, small mind

    January 16, 2013 03:51 pm at 3:51 pm |
  21. William

    I don't understand why every time something happens, there has to be new laws put into place to hinder the law abiding citizens. You have 9/11 and all of a sudden the whole country changes, I admit we need some of this for our safety and security, but for every law passed there has to be enforcement. That's the first problem, they're not being enforced. If you want to ask questions about Newtown, Why the hell did the woman have those weapons in the house under the pretense of having a son in question of mental stability. This country was founded on the principle that guns were important, or it wouldn't have been written into the constitution. If I wanted to live in a country without guns, I would go back to the "British homeland" where not even the police carry weapons. Last I checked, this country was founded for the freedoms from the King/Queens rule, now we're heading back to the life of 250 years ago.

    January 16, 2013 03:52 pm at 3:52 pm |
  22. Steve

    Why do you think Wal-Mart is going to hire hundreds of vets? They'll have trained, armed guards at every door.

    January 16, 2013 03:56 pm at 3:56 pm |
  23. Rudy NYC


    Rudy NYC you always ask for proof look it up more children are killed by autos backing over them than mass shooting 50 children a week
    What a foolish analogy. First of all, you display horrific value for the life of a child. Second, your argument totally ignores the fact of how many autos are operated each and every day when compared to how many assault weapons are operated each and every day.

    "Nice try, but we gotcha."

    January 16, 2013 04:00 pm at 4:00 pm |
  24. cnnife

    Critical thinking,

    Your reasoning is absolute nonsense. You said "so after you sign this bill to help protect those children that are flanking you Mr. President, you might want to ask them for their $17,000 while you have them there" Can you please explain what your response has to do with protecting children from gun violence??

    January 16, 2013 04:22 pm at 4:22 pm |