June 28th, 2013
06:03 PM ET
10 years ago
Analysis: Supreme Court term ends with no easy way to label it
Washington (CNN) - It's a familiar refrain from the media-shy U.S. Supreme Court: Judge us by what we write in our rulings, not in oral arguments, speeches or interviews.
But the court term that ended this week in dramatic fashion reveals how difficult it can be to create a coherent picture of this dynamic bench, one that moves easily, if stealthily, across ideological lines on a range of hot-button cases.
FULL STORY
From CNN Politics
- The names and places that define America's week of 'tragedy upon tragedy'
- 10 Cards Charging 0% Interest Until 2024
- Trump will hit the trail looking to reinvigorate his campaign
- Federal prosecutors discussed charging Trump in Stormy Daniels case when he left office, book says
- Inside Tom Emmer's effort to keep the GOP's razor-thin majority in line
- Untitled
Can't wait until the Gold Dust Twins, Scalia and Thomas finally croak!
We really love John Roberts. God bless him with hundred years of good life!!!
How about (the never ending saga, of people so out of touch that they can not, and will not relate to the people), supreme court follies of 2012-through-2013. They've shown how to sidestep and avoid issues since time eternal.
Just lose Clarence Thomas and it's a new day in America.
Supreme Court term ends with no easy way to label it ?? How about the most sordid judges in the American history. Time is ripe to drive this criminals away.
That because half of them could care less about the laws, they are Their to change any laws the special interest tells them to. voting rights, citizens united, they are plitical activists, not judges, roberts, bought and paid for, scalia too