September 3rd, 2013
02:28 PM ET
10 years ago

Happening now: Lawmakers grill Obama officials on Syria

Check back here for the latest updates in our live blog of the Senate hearing

(CNN) - Top Obama administration officials faced tough questions Tuesday as they made their case for a military strike in Syria during their first public congressional hearing on the issue.

Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey sat before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday afternoon.

The specter of the war in Iraq looms over lawmakers as they make their decision to give the president authorization to use force in another war-torn country. Many members are undecided on how they will vote when Congress officially reconvenes from recess next week.

How will they vote? House | Senate

With both Kerry and Hagel being former senators, they know how to navigate a congressional hearing. The officials have already been on the phone with lawmakers in classified briefings and are scheduled to take part in at least one more hearing this week with the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday.

Check back here for the latest updates from the hearing.

6:45 p.m. ET - Sen. John McCain, perhaps the Senate's most outspoken voice in favor of military action in Syria, was caught playing poker Tuesday at the hearing.

He senator later explained his poker habit on CNN's "The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer."

"As much as I like to always listen with rapt attention constantly (to) remarks of my colleagues over a three and a half period, occasionally I get a little bored and so I resorted," he said, chuckling. "But the worst thing about it is I lost thousands of dollars in this game."

He followed up, saying it was only "fake" money.

6:10 p.m ET - The hearing is adjourned, roughly three and a half hours after it started. Members will get a classified briefing on Wednesday.

6:09 p.m. ET - Menendez says they are close to finalizing the resolution for markup on Wednesday.

6:01 p.m. ET - Sen. Ed Markey, who filled Kerry's Senate seat with Kerry left to become secretary of state, is the last senator to question Kerry.

5:50 p.m. ET - Libertarian-leaning Sen. Rand Paul engaged in a somewhat tense back-and-forth with Kerry. The Republican senator from Kentucky argued that the outcomes of a U.S. military strike in Syria are unclear and questioned the officials' certainty that such a strike will hurt Assad and make the region more safe.

"Will the region be more stable or less stable? I think there's a reasonable argument the world may be less stable because of this," Paul argued. He also asked if Israel will be more safe, saying a strike in Syria may spur Hezbollah to attack Israel in retaliation.

Paul said his office gets calls by the thousands and not one person is calling in favor of intervening in Syria.

But Kerry said he knows for sure a strike against Syria would make the world–and the region–more safe.

"I can make it crystal clear to you that Israel will be less safe unless the US takes this action," Kerry said in response. "Iran and Hezbollah are two of the three biggest allies of Assad. Iran and Hezbollah are the two single biggest enemies of Israel. So if Iran and Hezbollah are advantaged by the United States not curbing Assad's use of chemical weapons, there is a much greater likelihood that at some point down the road Hezbollah...will have access to these weapons of mass destruction."

Kerry added that Israel feels quite confident of defending itself if Hezbollah attacks out of retaliation.

"If the United States doesn't do this, senator, is it more or less likely that Assad does it again?" Kerry asked Paul

"I think it's unknown," Paul said.

"Senator, it's not unknown," Kerry interjected. "If the United States of America doesn't hold them accountable on's a guarantee Assad will do this again. I urge you to go the classified briefing and learn that."

Kerry argued that all three of the officials at the meeting understand what it means to go to war. "We don't want to go to war," he said. "The president is asking for the authority to do a limited action that will degrade the capacity of a tyrant who has been using chemical weapons to degrade his own people."

"But by announcing that, you say your goal is not winning," Paul said.

Kerry reiterated the president is not asking to go to war but simply saying we need to take "an action" that will hurt Assad. "I don't consider that going to war in the classic sense of coming to Congress and asking for a declaration of war," he said. "That's not what the president is asking for."

Kerry asked if Dempsey wanted to weigh in.

"No not really, secretary. Thank you for asking," Dempsey said.

5:37 p.m. ET - Kerry says if Congress votes down the president's proposal to take military action in Syria, "it is a guarantee–whether it is with Assad in Syria or nuclear weapons in Iran or nuclear weapons in North Korea–we will have invited a for certain confrontation at some point in time."

Speaking to the parallels with Iraq, the secretary of state said there is a distinction. He said intelligence reports at the time indicated weapons of mass destruction simply existed and "we had a mass invasion" to find those weapons. In Syria, however, not only does the U.S. know that chemical weapons exist, but they have been used multiple times, he said.

5:33 p.m. ET -

5:31 p.m. ET - Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, says he hasn't seen this level of public debate since the health care reform debate of 2009-2010. Murphy served in the House before being elected to the Senate in 2012.

5:25 p.m. ET - Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyoming, asks what the president will do if Congress votes down the resolution. Kerry says they're not even contemplating that scenario right now.

5:23 p.m. ET - Menendez says they're looking forward to the "possibility" of a markup tomorrow of the president's resolution.

5:02 p.m. ET - McCain: "When you tell the enemy you're going to attack them, I'm not to take any time on this, you're going to attack them, they're obviously going to disperse and try to make it harder. I'm looking right here at a AP story report Syria said to be hiding weapons and moving troops. There's even open source reporting that they may be moving some of their assets into the Russian naval base. It's ridiculous to think that it's not wise from a pure military standpoint not to warn the enemy that you're going to attack."

5:02 p.m. ET - Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, begins his questioning. McCain has been one of the most vocal senators in favor of taking military action in Syria. He jokes to Kerry's wife, Teresa, saying "I apologize for what I'm about to do to John."

5:01 p.m. ET - Hagel is sporting a noticeable bruise on his chin. CNN Pentagon Correspondent Barbara Starr reports the SecDef’s injury was a result of exercising his green thumb.

According to an aide, “Secretary Hagel slightly bruised his chin while doing a little yard work at home over the weekend.”

5 p.m. ET - Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, asks what's been the response of the Muslim-Arab world to the potential of U.S. military action in Syria. "If this danger to the region is so profound, it seems we should have greater support," he said.

Hagel says he would prefer to discuss that in a classified setting.

Durbin asks about collateral damage. Dempsey says the collateral damage estimate is low, but added that figure doesn't include what damage could be done to regime personnel.

4:55 p.m. ET -

4:52 p.m. ET - Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona, asks if there is evidence that the Assad regime is moving some of its targets as the U.S. waits to take military action.

Dempsey responds, saying "there is evidence, of course, that the regime is acting not only to the delay, but also they were reacting to the very unfortunate leak of military planning."

4:29 p.m. ET - Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, asks if Hezbollah has access to chemical weapons, since it has been cooperating with Assad's regime. Kerry says they need to talk about that in a classified setting.

4:13 p.m. ET - Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, raises the question again of what will happen if Assad weathers the attack and feels emboldened after facing down the most powerful nation in the world.

Kerry said that because the president is only asking for "limited authority" to degrade Assad's current ability to use chemical weapons and not asking for permission to destroy "the entire regime," then Assad "will weather" the attack.

"He will be able to stand up and no doubt he'll try to claim that somehow this is something positive for him," Kerry said. "We believe deeply...that there is no way it will in fact be beneficial for him. That will not translate on the ground."

The secretary of state also tried to clarify again that the president is not proposing–or leaving the door open–to putting troops on the ground.

"I want to emphasize something...This authorization does not contemplate and should not have any allowance for any troop on the ground. What I was doing what hypothesizing on the potential of what might happen at some point in time," Kerry said, referring to a point earlier in the hearing when he said putting troops on the ground would not be taken off the table.

4:09 p.m. ET – A protestor interrupts the hearing, yelling "This nation used white phosphorous in Iraq" as he's escorted out.

4:07 p.m. ET - Sen. Cardin asks why there aren't more countries that are actively joining the U.S. in the potential military operation, in addition to offering verbal support.

Kerry said there is "no definitive list" of countries at this point because the president hasn't decided what action will be carried out. But the bottom line, he adds, is that "we're talking about very specific kinds of capacities that in some cases only the United States of America possesses."

Cardin says that he supports the mission.

4:01 p.m. ET - Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Maryland, says it's "clear that we have to respond" to Syria's use of chemical weapons. However, he thinks the draft resolution from the White House on the proposed mission is too broad and does not explicitly prohibit America troops on the ground. He urged the administration to write a resolution with more narrow language that focuses on the limited strike but doesn't leave "open the door for the introduction of troops."

3:59 p.m. ET - Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, argued the U.S. could be giving credibility to the Assad regime if U.S. does a limited strike, and then Assad still wins the civil war. Kerry responded saying there's no way Assad will be "better off" following U.S. military action.

"If (Assad) responds, he will invite something far worse...but that doesn't mean the United States is going to war," Kerry said.

3:56 p.m. ET -

3:48 p.m. ET - Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-California, says she'll support a strike but not a blank check. She asks if all the different intelligence agencies came to the same conclusion on chemical weapons being used in Syria.

Kerry says he doesn't know of any "agency that was a dissenter or anybody who had, you know, an alternative theory."

3:43 p.m. ET - Following up on his earlier comments about boots on the ground, Kerry says he doesn't want to give the impression that such a scenario is an option. "Let's shut that door as tightly as we can," he said, adding that he was only thinking of a "hypothetical" situation in which the use of chemical weapons spread.

"There will not be American boots on the ground with respect to the civil war," he said forcefully.

3:31 p.m. ET - Menendez asks whether American boots would be on the ground in Syria. Kerry says he can't take it off the table in case Syria "imploded" or chemical weapons landed in the hands of terrorists.

"I don't want to take off the table an option that might or might not be available to the president of the United States to secure our country," he said.

3:26 p.m. ET: Menendez asks if military action in Syria will make the U.S. more secure or less secure. Kerry responds that it will make the U.S. "unequivocally" more secure. Kerry also argued that the consequences of inaction are greater than action.

3:24 p.m. ET - Chuck Hagel: "There are always risks in taking action, but there are also risks with inaction. The Assad regime, under increasing pressure by the Syrian opposition, could feel empowered to carry out even more devastating chemical weapons attacks. Chemical weapons make no distinction between combatants and innocent civilians, and inflict the worst kind of indiscriminate suffering, as we have recently seen.

A refusal to act would undermine the credibility of America's other security commitments – including the President's commitment to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The word of the United States must mean something. It is vital currency in foreign relations and international and allied commitments.

Every witness here today – Secretary Kerry, General Dempsey, and myself – has served in uniform, fought in war, and seen its ugly realities up close...We understand that a country faces few decisions as grave as using military force. We are not unaware of the costs and ravages of war. But we also understand that America must protect its people and its national interests. That is our highest responsibility."

McCain, Graham issue tough warnings on Syria dilemma

3:23 p.m. ET -

3:20 p.m. ET - Chuck Hagel: "The Syrian regime's actions risk eroding the nearly century-old international norm against the use of chemical weapons...a norm that has helped protect the United States homeland and American forces operating across the globe from those terrible weapons.
The United States must demonstrate through our actions that the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable. The President has made clear that our military objectives in Syria would be to hold the Assad regime accountable, degrade its ability to carry out these kinds of attacks, and deter the regime from further use of chemical weapons."

Hagel: 'We're ready to go' if ordered on Syria chemical weapons

3:17 p.m. ET -

3:15 p.m. ET - After Kerry finished his opening statement, a protester started shouting and was removed from the hearing room. "Launching cruise missiles means another war," she yelled.

3:15 p.m. ET - John Kerry: "This is not the time for armchair isolationism. This is not the time to be spectators to a slaughter. Neither our country nor our conscience can afford the cost of silence.

We have spoken up against unspeakable horror many times in the past. Now we must stand up and act. And we must protect our security, protect our values, and lead the world with conviction that is clear about our responsibility."

3:12 p.m. ET -

3:10 p.m. ET -

3:09 p.m. ET - John Kerry: "As confidently as we know what happened in Damascus on August 21, we know that Assad will read our...silence as an invitation that he can use his weapons with impunity.

And in creating impunity, we will be creating opportunity – the opportunity for other dictators and terrorists to pursue their own weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons."

Obama officials try to sway House Democrats on Syria

3:03 p.m. ET -

2:59 p.m. ET - John Kerry: "I remember Iraq. Secretary Hagel remembers Iraq...We were here for that vote. And so we are especially sensitive, Chuck and I, to never again asking any Member of Congress to take a vote on faulty intelligence. That is why our intelligence community has scrubbed and re-scrubbed the evidence. We have declassified unprecedented amounts of information.

We can tell you beyond any reasonable doubt that our evidence proves the Assad regime prepared this attack...warned its forces to use gas masks. We have physical evidence of where the rockets came from and when. Not one rocket landed in regime-controlled territory. All of them landed in opposition-controlled or contested territory. We have a map, physical evidence, showing every geographical point of impact – and that is concrete."

2:55 p.m. ET - John Kerry: "As we convene for this debate, the world is watching not just to see what we decide. It is watching to see how we make this decision – whether in this dangerous world we can still make our government speak with one voice. They want to know if America will rise to this moment and make a difference."

Kerry: 'Signatures of sarin' found in Syria

2:53 p.m. ET - Ranking member Sen. Bob Corker said he hopes the officials will explain why Syria is important to U.S. national interests and why it matters to the Middle East. He also wants to see the U.S. "continue to carry out the strategy that has been stated, and that is building the capacity of the vetted opposition."

2:49 p.m. ET - Sen. Bob Menendez welcomes Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of John Kerry, who appeared at the hearing after spending three weeks in a rehabilitation hospital following a seizure in July.

2:48 p.m. ET - Members of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations:


Robert Menendez (Chairman)
Barbara Boxer
Benjamin L. Cardin
Jeanne Shaheen
Christopher Coons
Richard J. Durbin
Tom Udall
Chris Murphy
Tim Kaine
Edward J. Markey


Bob Corker (Ranking Member)
James E. Risch
Marco Rubio
Ron Johnson
Jeff Flake
John McCain
John Barrasso
Rand Paul

2:46 p.m. ET - Sen. Bob Menendez: "We are at a crossroads-moment. A precedent will be set either for the unfettered and unpunished use of chemical weapons... or a precedent will be set for the deterrence of the use of such weapons through the limited use of military force that sends a message that the world will not stand down."

2:45 p.m. ET - Sen. Bob Menendez: "We know that chemical weapons personnel from the Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Center – subordinate to the regime’s Ministry of Defense – were operating in the Damascus suburb of ‘Adra from Sunday, August 18th until early in the morning on Wednesday August 21st near an area the regime uses to mix chemical weapons including sarin and human intelligence as well as signal and geospatial intelligence have shown regime activity in the preparation of chemicals prior to the attack, including the distribution and use of gas masks.

We have multiple streams of intelligence that show the regime launched a rocket attack against the Damascus suburbs in the early hours of August 21st and satellite corroboration that the attacks were launched from a regime-controlled area and struck neighborhoods where the chemical attacks reportedly occurred clearly tying the pieces together. That is what we know in terms of who may have deployed these weapons.

READ MORE: What is sarin?

2:43 p.m. ET - Sen. Bob Menendez: "Are we willing to watch a slaughter just because the patrons of that slaughter are willing to use their veto at the UN to allow it to happen so their beneficiary can stay in power?

Are we so tired of war that we are willing to silence our conscience and accept the consequences that will inevitably flow from that silence to our national interests?

We will hear the arguments and the options presented to us today and we will look at the facts as we know them according to the declassified assessment released last Friday that Secretary Kerry so passionately presented to the nation."

2:42 p.m. ET - Sen. Bob Menendez: "This decision will be one of the most difficult any of us will be asked to make. But it is our role as representatives of the American people to make it, to put aside political differences and personal ideologies, forget partisanship and preconceptions, forget the polls, politics, and personal consequences. It is a moment for a profile in courage and to do what one knows is right.

It is our responsibility to evaluate the facts, assess the intelligence we have and then debate the wisdom and scope of a military response fully and publicly, understanding its geopolitical ramifications, and fully aware of the consequences.

At the end of the day, each of us will decide whether to vote for or against a resolution for military action based on our assessment of the facts and our conscience."

2:39 p.m. ET - Chairman Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, opens up the hearing.

“Let me welcome Secretary Kerry, Secretary Hagel, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dempsey, to the Committee.

We convene this hearing, as we have convened many before, to make one of the most difficult decisions we are tasked to make: the authorization of the use of American military power – this time in Syria – to respond to the horrific chemical attack of August 21st that took the lives of 1,429 Syrians including at least 426 children.

The images of that day were sickening. In my view the world cannot ignore the inhumanity and horror of this act."

2:36 p.m. ET - Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey walked in for the hearing.

2:25 p.m. ET - Two new polls on Tuesday indicate that more people oppose rather than favor U.S. military strikes against Syria.

Both surveys were conducted before and after President Obama's Saturday announcement that he would seek Congressional approval.

According to the survey from ABC News/Washington Post, 36% of Americans support military strikes, while 59% oppose. Support for strikes increases to 46% if other countries, such as Great Britain and France, participated.

Separately, a Pew Research Center poll shows that 29% Americans oppose military action, while 48% are against launching strikes.

Filed under: Syria
soundoff (419 Responses)
  1. Cancerman48

    What a Croc! They say they only want to do strategic strikes to send a message. Uh, ok bright ones, you do this and destabilize the situation to the point of the rebels winning. Then what, oh yeah then we have a issue of who will secure these bloody weapons so the "radical Rebels" i.e. the MB or AQ do not get their hands on said weapons. pray tell how are we to do this? oh yeah I guess that means boots on ground to secure the stupid things and pray tell who will that be? Yep, good ole Uncle Sam, since the Useless Nations will continue to sit around and diddle themselves while the MB or AQ have a yard sale with these items.

    September 3, 2013 05:13 pm at 5:13 pm |
  2. John

    Of course it's no Iraq Secretary Kerry. Syria doesn't have Syria to send it's poison gas to.

    September 3, 2013 05:14 pm at 5:14 pm |
  3. park more

    It's funny, since Saudi gov is pushing Obama to fight in Syria, why they can't do it by them self. Enough dirty money from Saudi

    September 3, 2013 05:15 pm at 5:15 pm |
  4. Dan

    what are those 2 hot girls behind Udall talking about?

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  5. Larry

    Obama should have went at this alone. Hundreds of people are dying because he's waiting on an incompetent Congress with an approval rating in the low teens.

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  6. ffs

    FFS... another war.. after 13 years stretching into 14 years, it's tiring...

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  7. james in greenville nc

    I think because this is a Democrat sponsored war so we are supposed to love it.

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  8. Ben

    ryche, I'm pretty sure the fact that you feel the need to point out that our president is black, and then claim the reason why he has the ability to move on Syria is because he is black, and there for doesn't receive criticism for it, proves that you are racist. Do you believe that "libs" kept there mouth shut during Dessert Storm because Colon Powell is black. I don't think so.

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  9. Yohan Smith

    I am thinking this is a case of the boy who cried wolf one too many times. The US has lost credibility with the rest of the world when it comes to intel and trust.

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  10. mkuske

    If Hillary runs, all the Republicans have to do is point at her abject failure as Secretary of State. A policy in Libya that got us involved in a civil war which saw the nation crumble into lawlessness resulting in Benghazi, which they then immediately politicized by trying to cover it up. The ascent of an Islamic dictator in Egypt. Slow walking Syria to the point where the opposition is now controlled by al Queda. Iran continues their unabated march towards nuclear statehood. And how awesomely effective was that "reset button" with Russia? Just look at the results of her tenure as SOS. It was one big fail...and now she wants to spread her "success" across all policy platforms???

    September 3, 2013 05:16 pm at 5:16 pm |
  11. carlin123

    Kerry: This isn't like Iraq.....yet.

    September 3, 2013 05:17 pm at 5:17 pm |
  12. Jules

    JoshO – this is the world's fight. A no vote says that it is ok for governments to gas their citizens because there will be no consequences. Also, anyone who believes we have a responsibility to support Israel cannot vote no or they cannot run for reelection as a friend of Israel. Could it be a mess – sure it could be a mess. Being the most powerful country in the world is messy and being able to act against horrid things such as chemical weapons is what makes us the most powerful country in the world. Not standing up against evil will diminish the US power in the world.

    September 3, 2013 05:17 pm at 5:17 pm |
  13. Jaimie

    Obama states this is not Afghanistan. Kerry states this is not Iraq. Got their stories down pretty well. Dont believe them. USA STAY OUT OF SYRIA PERIOD.

    September 3, 2013 05:18 pm at 5:18 pm |
  14. park more

    How about Sissi who killed 1000 people? Obama are you going for Sissi? Saudi did not decide hat so Obama. Are we following Saudi? Where is our honest and courageous leadership?

    September 3, 2013 05:18 pm at 5:18 pm |
  15. UDidntBuildThat

    Some whoppers already fed to the American sheeple by Obama and his merry men of pinnochios.
    Gitmo will be closed in 1yr
    Stimulus will create thousands of shovel ready jobs
    Stimulus will bring the unemployment down to 5.6%
    Stimulus will reduce the debt
    With Obamacare if u like ur Drs. u get to keep them
    With Obamacare u will see about $4500 reduction in your H/C premiums.
    Obamacare will reduce the debt and deficit
    IRS was the result of a few rogue agent in Cincinnati not linked to anyone in DC.
    Fast and Furious was not authorized by us (Holder in contempt of Congress)
    We are not collecting data on Americans.
    Ok u got me, we are collecting data on Americans but we are not reading them.
    The attack in Benghazi was a sponteneous attack by demonstrators in response to video.

    Now we are suppose to believe they are telling us the truth about Syria? Lets not forget, they are using the same intelligence fr those that gave us intelligence on Iraq.

    September 3, 2013 05:19 pm at 5:19 pm |
  16. omeany

    I disagree this is EXACTLY like Iraq only under a different President.

    September 3, 2013 05:19 pm at 5:19 pm |
  17. Sniffit

    Oh for crying out loud. There's apparently pretty much nothing the RWNJs won't invent in order to try to criticize Obama. Syria's chemical weapons programs and stockpiling date back to the 70's. They've been making sarin and VX and mustard gas FOR AGES. They've even been caught in third-party countries using corporations created in those countries as straw purchasers of the precursor chemicals. It has long been understood that Syria had the technological mastery to MAKE these things themselves; they did not need to obtain them elsewhere. Whoever is trying to sell this load of malarkey about "oh, well, we finally found all of Iraq's WMDs and Dubya was right all along" nonsense is pushing a very deliberate and methodical historical (not to mention hysterical) rewrite.

    September 3, 2013 05:21 pm at 5:21 pm |
  18. Dark tater

    I believe you're dumb enough to believe it Kerry.
    I can't imagine why the Syrian regime would think using biological weapon could benefit them.
    Its pretty much stands to reason someone else wanting to draw in the kind of people who "draw red lines" into this game, that's who is setting off WMD's in Syria ...even a nobody like me can smell a bad plot! Right Mr Putin?!

    September 3, 2013 05:22 pm at 5:22 pm |
  19. Sniffit

    "I disagree this is EXACTLY like Iraq only under a different President."

    Please list the exact matches.

    September 3, 2013 05:22 pm at 5:22 pm |
  20. davecu

    Where oh, where is the 'smoking gun"?
    We've been played before and will no doubt be again. Will this be the next?
    No debate that chemical weapons have been used.
    I believe each faction is capable of employing them to suck us in again.

    Enough! Show us the clear evidence. Barring that, stand down!

    September 3, 2013 05:22 pm at 5:22 pm |
  21. Bob

    Isn't like Iraq?

    Its worse than Iraq!!!

    September 3, 2013 05:23 pm at 5:23 pm |
  22. Ridiculous Gov

    More propaganda from the War Mongers – Khazars!

    September 3, 2013 05:23 pm at 5:23 pm |
  23. mike Lake Orion Michigan

    I do not trust any of these Politicians to tell the truth anymore!

    September 3, 2013 05:23 pm at 5:23 pm |
  24. UDidntBuildThat

    "This is not like Iraq" John Kerry
    "This is not like Afghanistan" Barack Obama
    "I am not a crook" Richard Nixon

    September 3, 2013 05:23 pm at 5:23 pm |
  25. AnnonUSA

    Bob Menedez needs to be quiet and listen to the people that have said NO to this strike.
    How many children will the US kill by mistake or on purpose, and how many of those will be acceptable Bob?
    This is a disgusting display of the Government ignoring the will of the people.
    Election day approaches, time for them to go.
    And John Kerry should be ashamed of himself for being such a War mongering shill.

    September 3, 2013 05:24 pm at 5:24 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17