February 27th, 2014
03:09 PM ET
9 years ago

Vets bill fails in Senate, victim of election-year gridlock

Washington (CNN) - A Democratic bill designed to make numerous improvements to services for veterans failed in the Senate Thursday, a victim of the partisan gridlock and election-year acrimony that dominates the chamber.

On a largely party-line vote, 56 to 41, the measure didn’t get the 60 votes it needed to clear a procedural hurdle.

[twitter-follow screen_name='politicalticker']

Republicans cited numerous policy reasons for opposing the bill and were further miffed when Democrats blocked them from offering amendments to try to change it.

“Unfortunately, it’s become standard practice around here for the majority to pursue partisan legislation in a take-it-or-leave-it manner, so it’s unsurprising that nobody other than the Majority Leader and Committee Chairman has been allowed the opportunity to amend this bill,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Democrats accused Republicans of trying to spike the bill by insisting one of their amendments deal with imposing new sanctions on Iran, something the White House has urged lawmakers not to do while sensitive diplomatic talks are underway with Iran over its nuclear program.

“It was disappointing – if not surprising – when Republicans almost immediately injected partisan politics into a debate over a bill that should be bipartisan, insisting on an unrelated amendment on Iran that they knew could derail the veteran’s bill,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Democrats pointed to statements from several major veterans groups and AIPAC, the influential pro-Israel lobbying group, urging Republicans not to push for a vote on Iran on this bill.

The $21 billion bill, which was written primarily by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, who chairs the veterans committee, would improve veterans’ access to health care services, and expand educational and job training programs for vets. It also aims to reduce the giant claims backlog the Department of Veterans Affairs currently faces.

Sanders argued that “we still have a very long way to go” to meet the needs of older veterans as well as the thousands of service members recently returned from Iraq and Afghanistan. “

“Please do not inject extraneous issues in here for totally political reasons. I think that’s unfair to American’s veterans,” Sanders said during a floor speech this week. “Let’s not kill this bill because of the same ol’, same ol’ partisan issues that we face.”

Republicans cited several concerns with the bill, including its funding - money originally intended for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They also complained the bill would open the VA’s health services to any veteran regardless of whether their disability was service related or if they had private insurance to cover it.

“I do have serious, serious concerns about this expansion,” said Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, the top Republican on the veterans committee. “Expanding eligibility could stress an already overburdened system.”

Burr said Republicans have an alternative bill that would address many of the issues in the Democrats’ bill, minus the expansion for non-service related problems. Burr agued it’s fair for his party to push for amendments, including a vote on Iran sanctions because Reid had vowed to hold such a vote months ago.

He said the veterans’ bill was doomed from the start because Democrats tried to pass it without GOP involvement.

“I’ve got to think that Leader Reid saw this as another opportunity to have a political discussion, thinking the veterans population was the right to place to have it,” Burr said.

Republican Sen. John Thune, R-South Dakota, argued Reid was using the bill to attract veterans to vote Democratic this year and purposely loaded it up with items Republicans oppose so they would vote against it.

“The way they’re running the place right now is it has become purely an institution where they put bills on the floor they think basically achieve some political objective and they have no interest in having a candid, honest debate with amendments that might fix a problem so that’s kind of the state of play right now. Hopefully it will change,” he said.

Filed under: Senate • Veterans
soundoff (155 Responses)
  1. edpeters101

    Once again the GOP comes up with an "obstruction"! I do kinda like the idea of possibly morphing the VA in to the Affordable Care Act..

    February 27, 2014 04:44 pm at 4:44 pm |
  2. NewIdeas

    So, Republicans refused to vote for the Dem bill saying that it would shift veterans with all pre-existing conditions to taxpayer funded VA hospitals (instead of Obamacare insurance). And he Repubs tried to add the Iran sanctions vote as good measure to get Dems on board voting against their own bill.

    But, Harry Reid wouldn't allow a separate vote on the Repub bill that excluded the veteran non-service connected treatments from the taxpayer funded VA hospitals.

    Partisan politics by both sides. Reid won't allow a vote on a bill that he knows would pass, and Republicans tried to get some Dems to tunr against their own bill.

    February 27, 2014 04:44 pm at 4:44 pm |
  3. Old West

    This republican party is a disgrace...But some of you will continue to vote republican...Well, I hope you get everything you voted for...morons...

    February 27, 2014 04:44 pm at 4:44 pm |
  4. 2_indy1600

    @just me "their amendment had absolutely nothing to do with this bill."
    You mean expanding the burden on an already over-burdened system? You mean money???????

    February 27, 2014 04:44 pm at 4:44 pm |
  5. smith

    gary – I'm an vietnam era vet that enlisted partly because of the PROMISED free life health care. That promise was broken years ago "

    @Gary-Not sure about your era's contract, might wanna contact a lawyer. As of now it based off your income, when I first got out everything was free. However, once I got a job it was 90/10 with a 25$ copay.

    February 27, 2014 04:44 pm at 4:44 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7