Sunday Chatter: GOP hold up ‘Obama-is-weak’ card; GOP angling
March 9th, 2014
04:10 PM ET
8 years ago

Sunday Chatter: GOP hold up ‘Obama-is-weak’ card; GOP angling

The Sunday political talk shows were stacked with Republicans, and most of them said President Barack Obama has repeatedly showed weakness in his foreign policy, bolstering Russian President Vladimir Putin’s resolve and agenda in Ukraine.

If you missed any of the Sunday political chatter, we've got you covered:

Obama is not weak: Tony Blinken, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, defended the President and his response to Putin’s advancement in the Crimean peninsula in Ukraine.

[twitter-follow screen_name='politicalticker'] [twitter-follow screen_name='LACaldwellDC']

“With regard to Russia, in coordination with our allies, we've imposed significant sanctions on Russia, and that's already exerting a cost. We've seen Russian markets go down substantially, the ruble go down and investors sitting on the fence,” Blinken said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “Russia is paying a price for this.”

But Obama really is weak: But Republican adversaries aren’t buying it.

“The administration thought if we just act nice, everyone will act nice with us. That's not way that Putin and the Russian Federation sees the rest of the world,” Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said on ABC’s “This Week.”

On CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Rep. Paul Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin and potential 2016 presidential candidate, criticized the United States’ “reset” policy with Russia as “wishful, naïve thinking” – a targeted jab at fellow potential presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who led that policy as secretary of state.

And former Vice President Dick Cheney, a foreign policy hawk, was the most pointed: “We have created an image around the world - not just for the Russians - of weakness, of indecisiveness,” he told CBS News’ “Face the Nation” guest host Charlie Rose.

Cheney said the world is “a safer, more stable place when the United States leads, when we have significant military capability, and when people know we will use it if necessary.”

“They no longer fear us,” he added.

“The Syrian situation is a classic - we got all ready to do something, but … at the last minute, Obama backed off.”

Syria is not Ukraine: When CNN’s Candy Crowley asked Blinken whether Putin sensed weakness after watching the United States deal with Syria, Blinken said the civil war in Syria and the United States’ policy there had no bearing on Ukraine.

“The notion that this is somehow a result of Syria makes very little sense to me. This is about Ukraine,” he said, adding that Obama and the United States are “doing the leading” against Putin.

Bob Gates, former defense secretary for both Obama’s and President George W. Bush’s administrations, defended the President on “Fox News Sunday.”

He said criticism of the President “ought to be toned down while he’s trying to handle the crisis,” Gates said.

Remember Georgia? Rogers, of Michigan, said Russia’s actions in Crimea are similar to what Russia did in Georgia in 2008.

“We’ve seen this story before, and when we didn’t react … we ended up buying into bigger trouble later, and I think that’s what you’re seeing happening,” he said.

Gates said President Bush didn’t receive the same criticism then as Obama is receiving now.

“My own view is, after all, Putin invaded Georgia when George W. Bush was President. Nobody ever accused George W. Bush of being weak or unwilling to use military force.”

Cheney addressed that, saying the Bush administration did respond to Russia’s invasion of Georgia.

“We did take some steps in terms of providing assistance to Georgia. We had ships in the region and so forth,” Cheney told Rose.

Two paths – for Russia and for the United States: Blinken laid out the Obama administration’s plan:

“What Putin is seeing is the President mobilizing the international community, both in support of Ukraine and isolate Russia for its actions in Ukraine,” Blinken said. He added that Russia has a choice to make: continue to push forward in Ukraine and face economic repercussions, or retreat.

“The President made it very clear in announcing our sanctions, as did the Europeans the other day, that this was a first step,” Blinken said.

But some Republicans outline a different path for Obama to take.

Cheney said the ballistic missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland should be put back on the table. He also said the United States should conduct joint military training exercises in Poland and provide equipment and training to the Ukrainian military.

Oil and natural gas: Republicans, who have been pushing the Obama administration to expand domestic oil and natural gas production, read from similar scripts Sunday, saying American energy production is critical to minimizing Putin’s international influence.

Ryan: “We're a nation with vast energy reserve and potential but with a government that's seen as hostile toward developing those energy reserves. If our government changed its tune on that, if we told Europe we are going to green light the languishing permit applications for exporting natural gas to Europe, that could do a lot to send signals that we're intent on loosening Russia's grip on its energy to Europe.”

Rep. Peter King of New York on NBC’s “Meet the Press”: “We have to increase exports of liquefied natural gas. These countries like England and others and Germany cannot be forced to rely on Russia. … The natural gas - we have enough to supply so many countries in the world. And we should right now start lifting restrictions. We should begin exporting as quickly as we can.”

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on “Fox News Sunday”: I “would immediately get every obstacle out of the way for our export of oil and gas, and I would begin drilling in every possible conceivable place within our territories in order to have production that we could supply Europe with if it's interrupted from Ukraine.”

Cheney: “Energy is also a weakness for Russia. They depend on Petroleum for 50% of their GDP. Price of oil drops a few dollars, they go into recession.”

Rand Paul is not weak, either: Paul pushed back on criticism from fellow Republicans that he is an isolationist, saying those who criticize him do so for “their own person political gain.”

<> on March 7, 2014 in National Harbor, Maryland.

Paul recently said the United States needs to have a “respectful - sometimes adversarial but a respectful – relationship.”

“In fact, what Ronald Reagan said in about one sentence sums up a lot of what I believe. He said to our potential adversary, ‘Don't mistake our reluctance for war for a lack of resolve,’” Paul said.

Now for some politics: The annual Conservative Political Action Conference wrapped up Sunday with Sarah Palin reading a parody of Dr. Seuss’ children’s book “Green Eggs and Ham.”

But the real headline- grabbers from the conference were the nearly dozen possible 2016 presidential contenders who addressed the activist crowd and the fact that Paul was the overwhelming winner of the straw poll.

As Paul put it, CPAC is a friendly crowd because it is “chock full of young people” who share his concern over privacy rights even though he is also reaching out to Attorney General Eric Holder to repeal felon voting bans.

“I don't mind saying that I agree with the President or Eric Holder on this because I think the people who know me know that I will stand up to the President when he's wrong, which I think is quite a bit of the time,” he said.

Paul joked that at a friendly lunch to talk about felon voting, Paul said to Holder, "I'll see you in court," referring to his suit against he Obama administration's surveillance program.

His statements are a contrast to those of fellow Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, who has been a major pain to many of his colleagues because he doesn’t play by the rules and holds little regard for taking one for the team.

Cruz told the CPAC crowd that Republicans who “don't stand and draw a clear distinction” or don’t stand for principle don’t win.

Ryan said Republican Party disagreements aren’t a civil war but rather show that the party has a “big tent.”

“I think we're a party with a vibrant debate adding ideas, solving problems. We're going to be OK,” he said.

The new Democrat has some words for the old Democrats: Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who is running to win his job back - this time as a Democrat - had loads of praise for Obama.

He said Obama has “a compassionate heart,” is “leading well” and that Democrats need to “support him.”

“God bless him,” Crist said about Obama twice during the interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

As for the endangered Democrats up for re-election who are running from the Affordable Care Act, Crist said they need to “strengthen up.”

The kicker: Ryan and Paul both enlightened us one more time about their plans for a 2016 presidential run. They both are considering.

Ryan also said House Speaker John Boehner is “controversial but doing a very good job.” But Ryan has no interest in taking on one of the most difficult jobs in Washington.

Filed under: Dick Cheney • Obama administration • Paul Ryan • Rand Paul • Russia • Ted Cruz • Ukraine • Uncategorized • Vladimir Putin
soundoff (510 Responses)
  1. John

    All this talk about rhetoric from Repubs? Nothing compares to;
    You can keep your doctor.
    You can keep your health plan.
    Obamacare will save money.
    You lib dems talk all you want. America has seen through your garbage.
    You libs claim Repubs aren't backing Obama – here is a simple question for you – what is Obamas plan re-Putin? Go play more golf? That is what you are saying we should support? How about vacations? I hear we have several more planned for the family. The one to China for the Obamas shouldn't cost us much.
    A repeat of 2010 is coming, but don't worry libs. Given the blind followers you are you won't even notice.

    March 10, 2014 12:13 pm at 12:13 pm |
  2. Thaddius

    Why didn't Bush stop Russia from invading Georgia?

    March 10, 2014 12:14 pm at 12:14 pm |
  3. Edward Clark

    He is better than a president that would be called "tough" who would take this country to another war because of greed & profit making. America is not ready for any war again .How much money have we spent in Afghanistan & Iraq & how much profit did the war mongers make for themselves-a lot in billions at the expense of Americans. While the country has lost a lit financially, individuals made huge profits. Obama is wiser not to take America into any senseless war. Is this what some greedy Americans don't want?.

    March 10, 2014 12:16 pm at 12:16 pm |
  4. hellsyeahs

    "Obama is weak" – Tea Party

    "We want a "strong leader" like Rand Paul" -You know, the dude who wants to pull our military out from every corner in the world. Tea Nuts are a special kind of stupid only a mother could love.

    March 10, 2014 12:25 pm at 12:25 pm |
  5. bobo

    Maybe this is why Dem's are having such a tough time.........

    Sen. Reid (D-NV):“In fact, one of our core principles is that if you like the health care you have, you can keep it.” (Congressional Record, S.8642, 8/3/09)

    Sen. Murry (D-WA): “Again, if you like what you have, you will be able to keep it. Let me say this again: If you like what you have, when our legislation is passed and signed by the President, you will be able to keep it.” (Congressional Record, S.6400, 6/10/09)

    Sen. Landrieu (D-LA): “If you like the insurance that you have, you'll be able to keep it.” (MSNBC’s Hardball, 12/16/09)

    Sen. Hagan (D-NC): “We need to support the private insurance industry so that people who have insurance they're happy with can keep it (National Journal’s Congress Daily, 6/18/09)

    March 10, 2014 12:27 pm at 12:27 pm |
  6. Rudy NYC


    Maybe this is why Dem's are having such a tough time.........

    Sen. Reid (D-NV):“In fact, one of our core principles is that if you like the health care you have, you can keep it.” (Congressional Record, S.8642, 8/3/09)

    Sen. Murry (D-WA): “Again, if you like what you have, you will be able to keep it. Let me say this again: If you like what you have, when our legislation is passed and signed by the President, you will be able to keep it.” (Congressional Record, S.6400, 6/10/09)

    Sen. Landrieu (D-LA): “If you like the insurance that you have, you'll be able to keep it.” (MSNBC’s Hardball, 12/16/09)

    Sen. Hagan (D-NC): “We need to support the private insurance industry so that people who have insurance they're happy with can keep it (National Journal’s Congress Daily, 6/18/09)
    Guess what? That was five years ago, 2009. I have never seen a health insurance plan that ran for five years without any changes being made to it, changes which always benefited the bottom line of the insurer. Have you? Didn't think so. Your insurance plans would have changed with or without the Affordable Care Act. Five years. Give me a break.

    March 10, 2014 12:36 pm at 12:36 pm |
  7. jamesnyc

    Once again the media is giving a voice to the chicken-hawks who have cost us trillions of dollars in unnecessary war. Once again people are bringing up a domestic issues (ACA) when the issue is foreign policy and again they do it without any ideas.

    March 10, 2014 12:37 pm at 12:37 pm |

    Gee...aren't Republicans great patriots for pushing us into ANOTHER costly confrontation...THIS TIME with an "enemy" who can KILL 99% of our 30 seconds?. Isn't there a way we can segregate these patriots, into a small portion of our country...say GUAM, so when the Russians respond, we can read about it in the newspaper?

    March 10, 2014 12:39 pm at 12:39 pm |
  9. John

    A little ironic that the GOP brings up the necessity of energy production....The only 2 years in the last 25 years that we have been a "net energy exporter" were the last 2 years, 2012, & 2013, during the Obama administration, and not even once during either Bush administration were we a net energy exporter........The internet will gradually expose the type of mis-information that the GOP is trying to jam down people's throats.............

    March 10, 2014 12:53 pm at 12:53 pm |
  10. Think_Dynamic

    Using Ukraine as alibi to assail president Obama politically is out of proportion. I am not siding any political party but to my understanding president Obama is almost precise of what he is doing in Ukraine crisis. Should GOP is looking to action similar to what former GOP president has done in Iraq and Afghanistan, US may not be able to survive with another economic onslaught. First, US has no business acting militarily against Russia as it is a definite military confrontation. Second, European allies should initiate punitive action for Ukraine against Russia as part of geo-political sphere. Of course US is involved when any members of NATO is attacked, it means it an attack to all members. Third, not all European allies may take part in military or political and economic sanction against Russia due to dependence on Russian gas supply. Russia's move taking ownership of gas company after gas lines were completed is intentional, putting dagger to European allies; a blackmail. European allies should take legal action against Russian gas company for turning over control to Russian government.

    March 10, 2014 12:54 pm at 12:54 pm |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21