Bill Clinton: ‘I nearly got’ Osama bin Laden
Washington (CNN) – Bill Clinton, just hours before planes crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, reportedly told an audience in Australia that he almost killed Osama bin Laden during his presidency.
Speaking to a group of businessmen in Australia on September 10, 2001, according to audio aired by SkyNews Australia on Wednesday, Clinton said that he "nearly got" the al Qaeda leader but didn't go through with a missile attack because of the collateral damage that would have come from it.
[twitter-follow screen_name='politicalticker'][twitter-follow screen_name='danmericacnn']
"He [Osama bin Laden] is a very smart guy, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about him – and I nearly got him once," Clinton said. "I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I didn’t do it.”
The tape, which was provided to SkyNews by Michael Kroger, a former head of the Liberal Party of Australia, aired on the networks show "Paul Murray Live."
According to Kroger, who appears on the show, the Clinton remarks came from a meeting the former president had with 30 businessmen and women at Crown Casino Complex in Melbourne.
"The event was taped with his knowledge," Kroger says on the show. "The tape has never been played. … Bill Clinton was answering a question from a member of the audience about terrorism, international terrorism and he made some extraordinary remarks which had hitherto remained in my vault."
A number of books and the 9/11 Commission Report have acknowledged that the Clinton administration considered a December 1998 strike on bin Laden but scrapped the plan over possible collateral damage.
Bin Laden would infamously go on to be the mastermind behind the September 11 attacks that killed 2,977 people. After going into hiding for years, bin Laden was killed on May 2, 2011 by U.S. Special Forces during an early morning raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
From CNN Politics
- House Oversight Committee subpoenas Trump's accounting firm Mazars again March 3, 2021 05:07 am
- White House pulls Tanden nomination March 3, 2021 05:05 am
- From confidence to a distraction: Inside Biden's failed push for Neera Tanden March 3, 2021 04:52 am
- Rep. Ronny Jackson made sexual comments, drank alcohol and took Ambien while working as White House physician, Pentagon watchdog finds March 3, 2021 03:00 am
- Biden administration unveils raft of sanctions on Russia over Navalny poisoning and imprisonment March 3, 2021 02:54 am
- Analysis: John Roberts has another chance to diminish the Voting Rights Act March 3, 2021 02:38 am
Isn't it ironic that those who rail against President Obama's use of drones to take out terrorists because of civilian casualties are the SAME individuals who are now wailing about President Clinton's decision to NOT wipe out an entire village and its inhabitants? Oh wait... that's not ironic – it's hypocritical as hell.
Does anyone else find it troubling that he brought this up the day before 9/11? It makes you wonder if he knew something devastating would happen the next day.
Well said President Clinton. You and President Obama "git ur dun."
Fair is Fair
"Clinton said that he "nearly got" the al Qaeda leader but didn't go through with a missile attack because of the collateral damage that would have come from it."
---–
Thanks, Bubba. Thanks heaps.
=============================================================
I am thankful for his decision, too. The optics on it would have looked really bad. United States launches sneak attack into sovereign nation that kills dozens of civilians would have played in one of two disastrous ways. An air strike would have probably meant that there would be no means to verify the objective. A ground assault has its' own set of logistical problems, the least of which is the operation being called an invasion.
Besides, he did a lot better than George W. Bush. "Heh, heh. I don't know where he is. Heh, heh." And then he proceeded to invade a sovereign nation that nothing to do with either 9/11, Bin Laden, or WMDs.
Hey, @Joey, yeah I guess he was just a figurehead, huh? Then why did Obama kill the old guy (10 years later) if he wasn't important...you can't have it both ways.
And Gore created the internet...What a crock.
Was too busy with Monica
Bill Clinton said, " Hey diddle-diddle, the cat and the fiddle, "I" could have jumped over the moon: Bill "First Person" Clinton: "I could have done; I could have done; I could have done"; but instead: " I stayed behind for BJ."
Bush was handed all the intel he needed to thwart 9/11 and sat on his hands. Then sank the country economically, with his unilateral decision to invade/attack a country with no provocation, thus killing far too many military people. Who benefited? Haliburton and Chaney's cronies, reaping oil profits.
Ive have told you leftist rebels 1000times B.C lead from behind behind ? hmmm
That makes it official
Clinton is mostly to blame for 9/11.
So it's ok to keep blaming Bill, but not Bush? Ok silly hypocrites, I got you! Heck lets just blame Reagan, the 1st Bush, and the CIA for turning Bin Laden into the monster that he was.
Could'a, would'a, should'a, can't wait for Hillary to be president, to here her excuses for failure.
Clinton said he could have, Bush had tried for most of his presidency with a war, then Obama got it done! So who does the credit go to?
This story is so old, it should be called "olds" not news. It came out in 2002.
"‘I could have killed’ Osama bin Laden"
Such a superhero. By the way, how's Energizer doing?
Everyone is reacting in hindsight. No one knew that 9/11 was going to happen or that it was even in the planning stages. From what I have read, Bin Laden was not the designer of the attack, he just approved the plan. So, you far right political goons have no qualms about killing 300 or more innocents to get to the man you are after. Nice, real nice, thank you for confirming my decision to turn left in my life.
Its hard to believe that with the technology available at that time that they could't find a way to smoke bin laden while minimizing collateral damage. Indecision from another Commander In Chief, this is becoming a familiar thing. Anyway instead of 300 of them it was thousands of us but that must be OK because we are a generous nation and would gladly save others at the expense of our own.
and the Monday morning quarterbacks are in mid-season form already...
We know this already! However, the socialist left kept saying this wasn't true....now we have the admission directly from the horses ass so to speak.
It's really evident from many of the posts here that people can't distinguish the difference between hindsight and wisdom. But, in the end, they are always right
Except he was too busy chasing interns around the White House.
And your wife could have saved the Americans in Benghazi.
All you Bush-bashing lemmings wanting to blame 9-11 on GWB: There you have it. Clinton knew Bin Laden wanted to harm the US, and he traded 3,000 American lives for 300 in Kandahar.
And because you did not kill him Bill, the plans for 9/11 came to fruition