Bill Clinton: ‘I nearly got’ Osama bin Laden
Washington (CNN) – Bill Clinton, just hours before planes crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, reportedly told an audience in Australia that he almost killed Osama bin Laden during his presidency.
Speaking to a group of businessmen in Australia on September 10, 2001, according to audio aired by SkyNews Australia on Wednesday, Clinton said that he "nearly got" the al Qaeda leader but didn't go through with a missile attack because of the collateral damage that would have come from it.
[twitter-follow screen_name='politicalticker'][twitter-follow screen_name='danmericacnn']
"He [Osama bin Laden] is a very smart guy, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about him – and I nearly got him once," Clinton said. "I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I didn’t do it.”
The tape, which was provided to SkyNews by Michael Kroger, a former head of the Liberal Party of Australia, aired on the networks show "Paul Murray Live."
According to Kroger, who appears on the show, the Clinton remarks came from a meeting the former president had with 30 businessmen and women at Crown Casino Complex in Melbourne.
"The event was taped with his knowledge," Kroger says on the show. "The tape has never been played. … Bill Clinton was answering a question from a member of the audience about terrorism, international terrorism and he made some extraordinary remarks which had hitherto remained in my vault."
A number of books and the 9/11 Commission Report have acknowledged that the Clinton administration considered a December 1998 strike on bin Laden but scrapped the plan over possible collateral damage.
Bin Laden would infamously go on to be the mastermind behind the September 11 attacks that killed 2,977 people. After going into hiding for years, bin Laden was killed on May 2, 2011 by U.S. Special Forces during an early morning raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
From CNN Politics
- Multiple crises at home and abroad provide a reality check for Biden's White House May 15, 2021 11:19 pm
- Analysis: Why GOP leaders are playing it smart when it comes to Trump May 15, 2021 08:47 pm
- Analysis: Here's what happens when political parties implode May 15, 2021 08:42 pm
- FBI and DHS report finds deaths at hands of racially motivated violent extremists on the rise in US May 15, 2021 07:38 pm
- Fact check: A week of brazen Republican dishonesty May 15, 2021 06:40 pm
- Senior Trump Air Force official suggested dramatically slashing F-35 jet numbers May 15, 2021 06:04 pm
Fair is Fair
Rudy NYC
Some of you folks can blame Clinton for 9/11. Nothing changes the fact that it occurred on George W. Bush's watch, despite all of the daily intelligence briefings, which were seemingly ignored as they plotted an Iraq invasion, that were warning of a domestic terrorist attack involving hijacked airplanes.
--–
Anything else you can share while you were attending the daily intelligence briefings? Oh... you weren't there?
============================================================
I wasn't. No need. I believe that it was the 9/11 Commission that revealed the existence of those briefings to the public.
I can see ever right wing knee jerk ratcheting this up for talking points, but at the time President Clinton made the right decision. The optics of taking out a whole town of 300 prior to 9/11 to kill a man who had that point had not committed a crime would have not been good. It would have been a war crime, on our part. .
This is old news. Everyone already knew about the Saudi Prince that was meeting with bin Laden at the time, and that was the reason why Clinton couldn't not fire the cruise missile. I am not saying it was right or wrong, because no one could have known what was going to happen 3 years later. I am only curious as to why is this a story now? It was a story right after the missed opportunity in 1998, and again right after Sept. 11th, 2001. Again, old news.
Clinton owns the first world trade center attack.
Wouldn't have mattered. The plan was in place.
@Rudy-So all the terrorist attacks on Clinton`s watch are his fault? What did you want GWB to do, declare marshall law and shutdown the airline industry worldwide? Gimmie a break. How about blaming the terrorist who actually did the attack.
Clinton was too busy playing with his miniature testicles to focus on destroying the most dangerous man on the planet at that time.
Mr. President, you also were on board a United Airlines jet later that day and then suddenly deplaned. Why?
Justin
Rudy NYC
So was the OKC bombing Clintons fault? Was the bombing of the USS Cole Clintons fault? Was the attack on the WTC in 1993? Was the WACO tragedy Clintons fault?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
According to the reds, yes Clinton WAS responsible for all of the above.
This statement means that the Bushy's cannot claim Bush was not warned. September 11, 2001 happened on Bush's watch he was warned, he knew the dangers of bin Laden. Anyone keeping abreast of the news during that period knew who was responsible for 9/11. It happened on Bush's watch. His to own.
you probably instigated the alleged murder of Vince Foster. yet you tell us you could have killed Ben Louden, but then again, you didn't. So what's your point?
You didn't nearly get anything. Men and women who served in the military yes, you Bill Clinton, who cowardly avoided military service, No.
Amazing how presidents try and take credit for things that happened while they were in office. Only the good things though, anything bad happens while there in office and they blame the other political party.
Bill could have saved the lifes of many Americans. Slick Willy should be shot!!!!
Hindsight is always 20/20. Bill Clinton made the best decision he could with the information he had at the time.
But he didn't.........#boom
He thought Saddam had WMD's as well. We all suffer from the fog of war. Remember that when you're always looking for someone to blame. Sometimes you just have to blame the bad guys, not ourselves.
Rudy NYC
I am thankful for his decision, too. The optics on it would have looked really bad. United States launches sneak attack into sovereign nation that kills dozens of civilians would have played in one of two disastrous ways. An air strike would have probably meant that there would be no means to verify the objective. A ground assault has its' own set of logistical problems, the least of which is the operation being called an invasion.
--
According to the article, he could have got him in December, 1998. This was AFTER the first WTC bombing. AFTER the USS Cole. AFTER the destruction of the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. AFTER Bin Laden was on the FBI's most wanted list.
You're thankful for his decision?????? Wow. Just wow.
-----------
Wow? The USS Cole was attacked in 2000. Wow? You need to get your facts from better sources. The Kenyan and Nairobi embassies were attacked in August of 1998. Wow, is right. That's at least one strike, maybe three, against you.
In 1998, Clinton was in the midst of being impeached and Republicans kept accusing him of using foreign crises as a distraction from it. Yes, I am thankful that he didn't make the types of mistakes that George W. Bush made.
------–
I stand corrected on the Cole.
December 1998 is definitely AFTER August 1998 so you're out to lunch on that point.
In August, 1998, Clinton decided to launch some cruise missles into Afghanistan and Sudan in retaliation for the bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Civilians were killed in both places. In fact, it's believed that thousands of Sudanese were indirectly killed because of the pharmaceutical company he bombed in Sudan (due to lost production of medicine).
And what difference does it make if he was being impeached? Does that allow a dereliction of duty?
Man, you're a piece of work for defending this.
WE know you COULD have!!!!! Thanks for Nothing!
Our Great Military LeaderS , George W & Cheney, could have GOT Bin Laden @ Tora Bora 2001. Iraq would have still 'happened" because of it's OIL & an attractive locale for a PERMANENT Military Base for their Colonial Empire.
This is not news. Clinton has been saying exactly this for years. Clinton ordered a missile strike against a Bin Laden camp in August of 1998. He left the camp only hours before the missiles hit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_missile_strikes_on_Afghanistan_and_Sudan_(August_1998)
You Clinton lovers need to read "Dereliction of Duty ". The book was written by an Air Force officer that was carrying the launch codes. Clinton had a chance to get Bin Laden long before 9/11, but he was busy playing golf and told the officer to leave him alone. Clinton lies once again to cover his rear end.
Kandahar is not a "little town". It's the second largest city in the country, almost as large as Fresno, CA.
Did anyone pay attention to the fact that this statement was made 13 years ago? Judging by the comments I'm going to guess no.....
Pathetic... dude is scrambling to build a legacy that isn't around Lewinsky, impeachment.
Kandahar a little town? May make for a good story, but factually incorrect.
Would Clinton have acted differently had he known the 9/11 attacks were being planned? Of course they might have happened even with Osama bin Laden dead, We'll never know, but I'd trade those 300 for the nearly 3,000 that died in New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington.