Bill Clinton: ‘I nearly got’ Osama bin Laden
Washington (CNN) – Bill Clinton, just hours before planes crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, reportedly told an audience in Australia that he almost killed Osama bin Laden during his presidency.
Speaking to a group of businessmen in Australia on September 10, 2001, according to audio aired by SkyNews Australia on Wednesday, Clinton said that he "nearly got" the al Qaeda leader but didn't go through with a missile attack because of the collateral damage that would have come from it.
[twitter-follow screen_name='politicalticker'][twitter-follow screen_name='danmericacnn']
"He [Osama bin Laden] is a very smart guy, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about him – and I nearly got him once," Clinton said. "I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I didn’t do it.”
The tape, which was provided to SkyNews by Michael Kroger, a former head of the Liberal Party of Australia, aired on the networks show "Paul Murray Live."
According to Kroger, who appears on the show, the Clinton remarks came from a meeting the former president had with 30 businessmen and women at Crown Casino Complex in Melbourne.
"The event was taped with his knowledge," Kroger says on the show. "The tape has never been played. … Bill Clinton was answering a question from a member of the audience about terrorism, international terrorism and he made some extraordinary remarks which had hitherto remained in my vault."
A number of books and the 9/11 Commission Report have acknowledged that the Clinton administration considered a December 1998 strike on bin Laden but scrapped the plan over possible collateral damage.
Bin Laden would infamously go on to be the mastermind behind the September 11 attacks that killed 2,977 people. After going into hiding for years, bin Laden was killed on May 2, 2011 by U.S. Special Forces during an early morning raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
From CNN Politics
- House Oversight Committee subpoenas Trump's accounting firm Mazars again March 3, 2021 05:07 am
- White House pulls Tanden nomination March 3, 2021 05:05 am
- From confidence to a distraction: Inside Biden's failed push for Neera Tanden March 3, 2021 04:52 am
- Rep. Ronny Jackson made sexual comments, drank alcohol and took Ambien while working as White House physician, Pentagon watchdog finds March 3, 2021 03:00 am
- Biden administration unveils raft of sanctions on Russia over Navalny poisoning and imprisonment March 3, 2021 02:54 am
- Analysis: John Roberts has another chance to diminish the Voting Rights Act March 3, 2021 02:38 am
This is a well known and previously documented fact. Why is it being treated like news now?
Wise desicion mr. clinton. you will be blessed.
"I nearly got him". Well, you didn't, so thanks for nothing. You act like you had his neck in your hands and all you had to do was strangle him single-handedly. It's this ridiculous arrogance that has brought us to where we are now. Evil triumphs when good men stand by and do nothing. Evil also triumphs when other evil men are so self-absorbed that they don't see the danger.
"I nearly got him". Well, you didn't, so thanks for nothing. You act like you had his neck in your hands and all you had to do was strangle him single-handedly. It's this ridiculous arrogance that has brought us to where we are now. Evil triumphs when good men stand by and do nothing. Evil also triumphs when other evil men are so self-absorbed that they don't see the danger. So you traded 300 innocent lives in Kandahar for 3,000 innocent lives in the United States.
While Bin Laden was the "mastermind" behind these attacks, al Qaeda likely would have gone forth with the 9/11 attacks (as I'm sure it was months, if not years, in the making). That being said, still incredibly upsetting to read.
And I invented the internet before Al invented it.
This statement was made the day before the attack? If so, how ironic.
Clinton had the opportunity to kill bin laden another time with a tomahawk strike but it would have also killed 1/2 the kuwaiti royal family too. Bin Laden was well connected among saudi and kuwaiti royalty.
America is a slave to the wealthy, who have ties to middle eastern money and could care less about our security.
I wish today we'd take collateral damage into consideration before drone attacks. When we kill innocent civilians we are destroying our image before the world & making people in that particular country hate us even more.
In this case, Clinton would not have known about the 911 attack plot. People can debate whether he should have attacked anyway but hindsight is always better than foresight.
You coulda, woulda, shoulda! Go away already! LIAR!
"I could have killed Osama, but I was way too busy with a cigar, lying to my wife, hiding my mistress, and tossing bombs on foreign countries to throw the public off my trail."
Oh, really! He killed so many Bosnian woman and children by bombing them from 30,000 feet! Who is he fooling!!!!
Something does not make sense. Clinton's presidency ended on Jan 20,2001. George Bush was president at the time of the attack. Is Clinton embellishing or has he reached senility?
Kandahar is a large city, 1 million people including the surrounding suburbs. Maybe Clinton was "inhaling" again when he said it's a tiny village of 300!
Oh my
someone may be hitting the sauce
Did one of these business men ask Clinton specifically about Bin Ladin? Seems worthy of investigation.
even if a pig has wings it still isn't a bald eagle
Way to go Billary–you could have got him with 300 dead on their side but let him live to murder 3,000 on our side!
U.S. President's powers:
– a blast killing 300 or more
– or doing nothing
?
So is it a good thing to get someone like that and have the collateral damage,.. or expose one to the possibility of a large terrorist attack orchestrated by such person?
History asks this over and over,.. Israelis are currently in midst of an international debate about that very thing,...
U.S. President's powers:
– a bla st killing 300 or more
– or doing nothing
?
I'm happy he didn't.
So he didn't get bin Laden because he was afraid of killing innocent women and children?
I can respect that. He had no idea what horror this terrorist scum would be capable of just hours later, but I can see why he would not have gone after bin Laden. Just a shame about the outcome.
I wish, he would have done it, saving thousands of American lives and the lives of tens of thousands around the world,
But, he was busy with Monica!!
Priorities!!