White House: No concessions to hostage takers
Edgartown, Massachusetts (CNN) – National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden tells CNN that U.S. policy on ransom for hostage takers is clear. She said Thursday that it "does not grant concessions to hostage takers.”
“Doing so would only put more Americans at risk of being taken captive," she said.
[twitter-follow screen_name='politicalticker'][twitter-follow screen_name='mattyhoyeCNN']
Hayden made the comments following the beheading of American journalist James Foley, and after questions were raised about a possible ransom demand from the Islamic militant group that held him.
Hayden says last year the Obama administration, in conjunction with Britain, built a consensus for a strong policy statement from a Group of Eight summit against paying ransom.
The statement said: “We unequivocally reject the payment of ransom to terrorists.”
The G8 statement, Hayden noted, also endorsed the Global Counterterrorism Forum’s “Algiers Memorandum on Good Practices on Preventing and Denying the Benefits of Kidnapping for Ransom by Terrorists.”
Hayden pointed out that the U.S. government offers assistance to states seeking alternatives to paying ransom.
The American assistance includes training for police forces on how to respond to terrorist kidnappings.
From CNN Politics
- Senior Senate Republicans voice new optimism that a power-sharing deal could be within reach January 26, 2021 01:34 am
- Trump begins speaking with impeachment lawyer, even as he scrambles to build defense team January 26, 2021 01:34 am
- Why the Supreme Court didn't want to hear the Trump emoluments cases and what it means going forward January 26, 2021 01:24 am
- House delivers impeachment article to Senate, triggering only 4th impeachment trial of a president in US history January 26, 2021 01:24 am
- John Roberts ducks the spotlight by skipping the second Trump impeachment trial January 26, 2021 01:22 am
- 'Carrying Tommy in my heart': Amid personal tragedy, Raskin leads House's impeachment case January 26, 2021 01:20 am
Yes, no ransom. Just tell them how many terrorists you want released from Gitmo! No valid offers refused.
Mr President keep bombing do not let up if there is colaterals oh! well your nick name now is Obomba keep bombing Mr President
Just nuke the entire region and be done with it.
Imbs, another insightful, intelligent contribution, thanks so much.
Hysterical to hear all the rwnj critic Obama's foreign policy decisions, like they are privy to all the info he gets, from intelligence agencies, foreign policy advisors: but, much like everything else, they've got it all figured out, too funny!
Hayden pointed out that the U.S. government offers assistance to states seeking alternatives to paying ransom.
---
Yes, it's called a meeting with Allah compliments of a SEAL team. 77 virgins not included.
Dutch/Bad Newz, VA – Take Back the House
Just nuke the entire region and be done with it.
----------
Maybe we should send the orchestra to play music... wasn't that your answer to North Korea when GWB was president?
salty dog
Imbs, another insightful, intelligent contribution, thanks so much.
---
looks like the truth stings a little huh? obama has negotiated with terrorists and the currency was five terrorist leaders for a suspected deserter/traitor. some negotiator that obama! leave no deserter-traitor behind.
Five terrorists is not ransom?
Hey, conservatives. Remember this?
"If you're not with us [the White House], then you're with the terrorists." George W. Bush.
@it must be said
There is a huge difference between prisoners of war and hostages. Trading prisoners to bring a soldier home is not a concession. It is a prisoner exchange. GWB released 500 Gitmo prisoners, many of whom were active militants and expected to return to the battlefield. At least we got one of our soldiers in return with the recent exchange.
What a load of bull. He lies yet again to American's faces as usual. He just released a bunch of Al-Qaeda terrorist leaders in exchange for a awol soldier so this is more propaganda as usual.
Looks like some of our mentally challenged friends on the right are still confusing POW exchanges with terrorist negotiations.... I guess they also have forgotten they are supposed to be the party who supports the troops while we are the troop haters...
It gets so confusing for them due to their utter lack of any real principles.
Pssstttt... when you have principles and beliefs righties, you don't have to have a foreign owned propaganda network tell you how to think or what to say or what you 'believe in' (today).
@Rudy NYC
Hey, conservatives. Remember this?
"If you're not with us [the White House], then you're with the terrorists." George W. Bush.
-----------
With all the talk of "2nd amendment solutions" and violent take over of the government, and domestic terror, I cannot help but think many in the Tea Party are cheering for the terrorists abroad.
it must be said
I know, why don't you grab your pop gun head right over there, and take care of this issue. When you leave it will raise the IQ of both countries.